Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Monitoring Report and Complaint/Apparent Violation Form
Extension without change of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
Approved without change
02/07/2024
06/30/2023
table that charts list comparision
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
02/28/2027
36 Months From Approved
02/29/2024
5,666
0
6,572
7,716
0
8,813
0
0
0
This information collection relates to the Wagner-Peyser Act, published January 6, 2020, which gives States increased flexibility in their administration of Employment Service activities funded under the Wagner-Peyser Act. The regulations align with the flexibility allowed under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA).
Pursuant to 20 CFR 653.109, SWAs use ETA Form 5148 to submit quarterly data to ETA on the services they provide to MSFWs. ETA uses that data to monitor and measure the extent and effectiveness of SWA service delivery to MSFWs and overall compliance with 20 CFR 651, 653, and 658. Additionally, 20 CFR 658.602(e) requires the ETA National Office to develop tools and techniques for reviewing and assessing SWA performance and compliance with ES regulations; and 20 CFR 658.602(f)(2) requires the National Monitor Advocate to review the performance of SWAs in providing the full range of employment services to MSFWs. The collection of data through ETA Form 5148 allows ETA to comply with these regulations and monitor SWA performance.
ETA requires that staff must ensure a complainant (or his/her representative) submits a complaint on the Complaint/Apparent Violation Form or another complaint form prescribed or approved by the Department or submits complaint information. The Complaint/Apparent Violation Form must be used for all complaints, including complaints about unlawful discrimination. ETA Form 8429 is helpful because it identifies whether a complainant is a Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker which implicates additional actions that must be taken.
There are no program changes to the forms in this ICR. However, the estimated burden calculations have been adjusted for increased accuracy. Specifically, the burden estimates were updated to account for the number of SWAs that should have SMAs, rather than the number of SWAs that currently have SMAs. The prior burden estimates included only the number of SWAs that have traditionally had SMAs, rather than the number of SWAs required to comply with Monitor Advocate System regulations at 20 CFR 653, including appointment of an SMA. Previously, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands have not had SMAs and were left out of burden estimates. However, Section 2 of the Wagner-Peyser Act defines âstateâ as âany of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. Therefore, there should be 54 SMAs, instead of 51 as used in prior versions of this ICR.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.