Document
National Center on Subsidy Innovation and Accountability Feedback Surveys
ICR 202506-0970-004 · OMB 0970-0401 · Object 158644600.
This document may belong to an older filing. More recent activity for OMB 0970-0401:
Document Viewer [docx]
Document Metadata
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
|---|---|
| File Title | National Center on Subsidy Innovation and Accountability Feedback Surveys |
| Author | Julie Kubelka |
| Last Modified By | Writer |
| File Modified | 2024-12-04 |
| File Created | 2026-11-01 |
| Conversion State | complete |
Extracted Text
National Center on Subsidy Innovation and Accountability Generic Data Collection Bank of Questions Overview: This document, using constructs and format developed by the Office of Head Start and NORC to facilitate data aggregation and analysis across events of the National T/TA Centers and reviewed by the Office of Child Care (OCC), outlines a bank of data collection questions to assess customer feedback to technical assistance. It identifies five constructs and related survey questions to be used by the National Center on Subsidy Innovation and Accountability (NCSIA) to evaluate the delivery of universal, targeted, tailored, and intensive technical assistance (TA). These constructs are Content Quality, Content Fit, Increased Knowledge, Intended Application of Knowledge, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). This bank of questions is for poll, discussion, pre and post surveys and other customer feedback surveys for the NCSIA’s training and TA offerings. Most universal and short-term TA engagements will include a post-survey only. A pre-post survey will likely be used for intensive, targeted, and long-term individualized engagements. NCSIA will select the most appropriate questions from this bank of questions based on the specific technical assistance event. All information collection requests will include the follow statement: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Public Law 104-13) STATEMENT OF PUBLIC BURDEN: The purpose of this information collection is to obtain feedback regarding technical assistance received. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 minutes per respondent, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and reviewing the collection of information. This is a voluntary collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB # is 0970-0401 and the expiration date is 5/31/2027. If you have any comments on this collection of information, please contact … Construct Survey Question Optional or Recommended Responses Example Type of TA for Use of Question Content Quality The content of the session was relevant to my work. Recommended Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The technical assistance provided was useful to my work. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The resources provided during the technical assistance/session/event were useful for my work. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The identified goals and outcomes of the technical assistance/session/event were met. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive Content Fit Please let us know whether you found the content presented in this technical assistance/session/event to be too simple, too advanced, or just about right. Recommended Scaled item Far too advanced (1) A bit too advanced (2) About right (3) A bit too simple (4) Far too simple (5) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What outcome or desired result, if any, was achieved with the support of this technical assistance? Optional Open Response Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The TA increased your agency’s access to examples of best practices and innovations implemented by other CCDF grantees. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Targeted, Intensive Increased Knowledge and Skill How much did the event increase your knowledge of (specific topics) presented? Recommended Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive How much did the event increase your comfort with communicating about (specific topic(s) presented)? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance/event/session increase your skill level in planning and implementing related policies and practices? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance increase your agency’s awareness and use of high-quality training or technical assistance opportunities? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance increase your agency’s access to and use of training or technical assistance resources and tools designed to support (specific topic area) staff orientation and ongoing training? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance increase your agency’s compliance with CCDF rules and policies? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance increase your agency’s use of CQI techniques? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance increase integration of your agency’s functions (e.g., administrative, technological, policy)? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance increase your Tribal agency’s access to TA support in establishing agreements with states? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Targeted, Intensive How much did the technical assistance increase your agency’s ability to establish and leverage partnerships to improve coordination and collaboration with other agencies? Optional Scaled item No Increase (1) Small Increase (2) Moderate Increase (3) Large Increase (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive BEFORE this technical assistance, my knowledge of (specific content/topics addressed) can best be described as … AFTER this technical assistance, my knowledge of (specific content/topics addressed) can best be described as … Optional Scaled item No knowledge (1) Minimal knowledge (2) Moderate knowledge (3) High level of knowledge (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive BEFORE this technical assistance, my comfort with communicating about (specific content/topics addressed) can best be described as … AFTER this technical assistance, my comfort level with communicating about (specific content/topics addressed) can best be described as … Optional Scaled item No comfort (1) Minimal comfort (2) Moderate comfort (3) High level of comfort (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The TA provided increased your agency’s use of audits to identify and address policy and procedural gaps. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The TA increased your agency’s use of process mapping and/or systems analysis to identify and address policy and procedural gaps. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive Intended Application of Knowledge I learned something during this event that I plan to use in my work. Recommended Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive BEFORE this technical assistance, my comfort with implementation efforts related to (specific content/topics addressed) can best be described as … AFTER this technical assistance, my comfort level with implementation efforts related to (specific content/topics addressed) can best be described as … Optional Scaled item No comfort (1) Minimal comfort (2) Moderate comfort (3) High level of comfort (4) Individualized, Targeted, Intensive Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion The information presented was respectful, nonjudgmental, and supportive of diverse populations (i.e., free from stereotypes or bias). Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The content of the presentation was inclusive of diverse cultural experiences and backgrounds. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive How could this technical assistance/session/event be more inclusive of or responsive to diverse audiences? Optional Open response Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive Optional Constructs: The following four constructs and related questions are optional, designed for planning future technical assistance, providing internal feedback to presenters, and improving technical assistance delivery. These constructs are Satisfaction, Presenter Quality, Formative Assessment, and Barriers to Application of Knowledge. Construct Question Type Responses Type of TA for Use of Question Satisfaction I was satisfied with the quality of this technical assistance/session/event. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive I was satisfied with the timeline of this technical assistance/session/event. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Targeted, Intensive I would recommend this technical assistance/session/event to my colleagues Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Targeted, Intensive What is your preferred way of learning virtually? Optional Choices Small Group Discussions Large Group Discussions Presentations Working Session Combination of Above Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What is your preferred technical assistance session length? Optional Choices Less than 60 minutes 60 minutes 90 minutes More than 90 minutes Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What is your preferred meeting schedule for ongoing technical assistance? Optional Choices Every Two Weeks Once per Month Quarterly Other _____ Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive Presenter Quality The presenters were knowledgeable in the content area. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The presenters were effective in engaging participants. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive The presenters were responsive to participants' questions. Optional Scaled item Strongly Disagree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4) Formative Assessment How can we improve this technical assistance/session/event? Optional Open response Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What topics would you like to learn more about in the future? Optional Open response Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What type(s) of follow-up support or resource(s) would be most useful to you on (this specific topic? Optional Open response Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What is the likelihood you or your staff would participate in a peer learning opportunity on this topic? Optional Scaled item Very unlikely (1) Unlikely (2) Likely (3) Very likely (4) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What additional T/TA opportunities would help you further improve your policies or practices? Optional Open response Individualized, Targeted, Intensive Would you be willing to share the work of your Lead Agency related to this technical assistance opportunity? Optional Yes (1) No (2) Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive How did you find out about this event? Optional Open response Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive What are you most interested in learning about (this specific topic)? Optional Open response Universal, Individualized, Targeted, Intensive Barriers to Application of Knowledge What factors, if any, may prevent you from using what you learned? Optional Open response Individualized, Targeted, Intensive