Enterprise Scheduling System
(ESS) and National Appointment and Scheduling Calendar (NASC)
Revision of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
07/22/2025
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
10/31/2025
10,420,161
3,150,000
14,083,467
312,500
0
0
The Enterprise Scheduling System (ESS)
allows for both customer self-scheduling and technician assisted
scheduling through an electronic scheduling tool, while the
National Appointment and Scheduling Calendar (NASC) allows for
technician-assisted scheduling through the ESS platform for initial
claims appointment requests. ESS facilitates both customer
self-scheduling and technician scheduling, along with NASC which
facilitates technician scheduling, allowing SSA to collect
essential information from customers, including their name, Social
Security number, zip code, telephone number, and email address.
Additionally, customers have the option to consent to electronic
messaging or to opt out, as well as specify their preferred method
of communication (email or text), language preference, preferred
service office, and appointment day and time preferences. SSA uses
this information to schedule in-office, phone, or video
appointments for processing enumeration, PE actions, or initial
claim appointments. Customers scheduling their PE or initial claim
appointments through a technician have the option to create a
one-time passcode, enabling them to securely update their
appointment online. The technician documents this one-time passcode
along with the customer's other appointment preferences. Customers
begin the process by accessing SSA.gov and engaging an online
questionnaire to determine the nature of their business. If
applications are available for customers to self-serve, the system
routes them to those applications to complete their business. If
not, customers are given the option to self schedule an appointment
through ESS. If the customer moves forward, the system directs them
to create a credential using Login.gov or ID.me. Once they complete
credentialing, customers access ESS to complete required screens
and fields to select a date and time for an appointment with an SSA
field office (FO) to provide the proofs necessary to obtain a
replacement or original SSN card or complete a PE action. Upon
completing the required screens and fields, the system presents
customers with a screen to review and submit all of the data they
input regarding the requested appointment. If customers encounter
issues with ESS, or they need to request an appointment type which
requires technician assistance (e.g., scheduling, rescheduling, or
cancelling PE or initial claims appointments), they may contact SSA
by phone to have an FO or Telephone Service Center (TSC) technician
schedule their appointment. Technicians follow existing processes
and policies to identify the caller as a legitimate customer, and
converse with the customer to determine the nature of their
business and if they require an appointment. If the technician
determines the customer needs an appointment, the technician
accesses ESS and completes the required screens and fields for the
enumeration or PE appointment, or NASC for an initial claim
appointment. Once the technician completes the ESS or NASC screens,
the technician can review all of the information the customer
provided with the customer. If the customer indicates it is correct
the technician submits and schedules the appointment. We conduct
this information collection each time a customer accesses the
online tool or contacts SSA by phone to schedule an appointment.
The respondents are individuals looking to schedule their SSA
visit, either through self-scheduling or technician assisted
modalities, using ESS and NASC.
When we last obtained OMB
approval for this information collection, the burden was 312,500;
however, we are currently reporting a burden of 1,469,194. This
reflects the additional respondents requesting technician-assisted
appointment scheduling for initial claims (see Addendum). Note: The
total burden reflected in ROCIS is 14,083,467, while the burden
cited in #12 of the Supporting Statement is 1,469,194. This
discrepancy is because the ROCIS burden reflects the following
component: teleservice center waiting time. In contrast, the chart
in #12 of the Supporting Statement reflects actual burden.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.