NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR part 63, subpart KKKK) (Renewal)

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
2079ss03.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2007-05-02	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
24785	NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR part 63, subpart KKKK) (Renewal)		Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2060-0541	ICR Reference No: 200705-2060-005
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200308-2060-016
Agency/Subagency: EPA/OAR	Agency Tracking No: 2079.03
Title: NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR part 63, subpart KKKK) (Renewal)
Type of Information Collection: Extension without change of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 07/30/2007
	Date Received in OIRA: 05/16/2007
Terms of Clearance: The burden and cost assumptions and calculations for the respondents and the agency should be updated in the next renewal.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2010	36 Months From Approved	07/31/2007
Responses	302	0	284
Time Burden (Hours)	27,517	0	7,815
Cost Burden (Dollars)	85,200	0	1,732,000

---

Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged under Section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act to establish standards to limit hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from stationary sources. In the Administrator's judgment, the metal can manufacturing surface coating industry causes or contributes significantly to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Metal can manufacturing surface coating operations are listed as an affected source category in a Federal Register notice dated July 16, 1992 (see 57 FR 31576) under the Surface Coating Processes industry group. The EPA's enforcement personnel will use the emissions data collected by each metal can manufacturing surface coating facility to (1) identify existing and new HAP emissions sources subject to the metal can manufacturing (surface coating) NESHAP, and (2) ensure the proper regulation of HAP emissions. Respondents are owners or operators of facilities that have metal can manufacturing surface coating operations. Metal cans include any single-walled container, usually cylindrical in shape, that is manufactured from metal substrate equal to or thinner than 0.3785 millimeters (0.0149 inch), in which solid or liquid materials may be packaged. Can ends, decorative tins, crowns, and closures are also included in the metal can source category. It is estimated that 142 major source facilities are subject to the provisions of this NESHAP in the United States and must be in compliance with the requirements of the metal can manufacturing (surface coating) NESHAP within three years of the effective date (promulgation date) of the rule. No new growth is expected in the metal can manufacturing surface coating industry.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): None

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	71 FR 58853	10/05/2006
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 27305	05/15/2007
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
NESHAP for Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR part 63, subpart KKKK) (Renewal)

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	302	284	0	0	18	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	27,517	7,815	0	0	19,702	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	85,200	1,732,000	0	0	-1,646,800	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $116,971

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 05/16/2007

---