Waste Management Plans, Refuse Discharge Logs, and Letters of Intruction for Certain Persons-in-Charge (PIC)

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
1625-0072_SS(1).doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2008-03-17	Available
30 Day Federal Register Notice.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2007-08-09	Available
1625-0072_StatA.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2007-08-09	Available
1625-0072 60-dy FRN.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2007-06-12	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
20587	Waste Management Plans		Modified
182747	Letter Of Instruction for PIC		New
182746	Refuse Discharge Logs		New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1625-0072	ICR Reference No: 200706-1625-004
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200407-1625-002
Agency/Subagency: DHS/USCG	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Waste Management Plans, Refuse Discharge Logs, and Letters of Intruction for Certain Persons-in-Charge (PIC)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 03/25/2008
	Date Received in OIRA: 11/19/2007
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	03/31/2011	36 Months From Approved	03/31/2008
Responses	757,725	0	5,508
Time Burden (Hours)	67,030	0	55,484
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: This information is needed to ensure that: (1) certain U.S. oceangoing vessels develop and maintain a waste management plan; (2) certain U.S. oceangoing vessels maintain refuse discharge records; and (3) certain individuals that act as person-in-charge of the transfer of fuel receive a letter of instruction, for prevention of pollution.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 33 USC 151.55 and 151.57 Name of Law: Navigation & Navigable Waters
   US Code: 33 USC 1901-1909 Name of Law: Navigation & Navigable Waters
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 18483	04/12/2007
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 44847	08/09/2007
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 3

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Waste Management Plans
Letter Of Instruction for PIC
Refuse Discharge Logs

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	757,725	5,508	0	0	752,217	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	67,030	55,484	0	0	11,546	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The change (i.e., increase) in hour burden is strictly due to an increase in the vessel population. The Coast Guard now uses a relatively new data base--MISLE--for estimating vessel populations and this allows us to more accurately estimate the vessels impacted by this COI. The methodology for estimating hour burden per respondent per year remains unchanged. The change in the number of responses is due to a change in the methodology used to determine number of Refuse Discharge Log (RDL) responses. Previously, the Coast Guard estimated the number of annual RDL responses as equal to the number of respondents. In this periodic renewal, we have changed the methodology to account for the estimated number of recordkeeping actions taken by each respondent for a year. Thus, instead of 1 response per respondent per year, we are estimating about 417 responses per respondent per year. We believe this more accurately reflects the amount of activity needed to comply with the RDL recordkeeping requirement. As stated above, the methodology for estimating hour burden per respondent per year remains unchanged. We have before, and continue, to estimate RDL hour burden per action (now equal to a response).

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/19/2007

---