The Efficacy of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) and its Associated Training on Differentiated Instruction and Student Achievement

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Fornative Assessment Study	Form and Instruction	New	Available
Formative Assessment Study	Form and Instruction	New	Available
OMB-ED QandA Jan 2008.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2008-01-17	Available
Att_Appendix B- Confidentiality form updated_LPA.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2007-10-19	Available
Att_Supporting_Statement_Part B_MAP.doc	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2008-01-29	Available
Att_Supporting_Statement_Part A_MAP.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2008-01-29	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
182414	Fornative Assessment Study	Form and Instruction	New
182413	Formative Assessment Study	Form and Instruction	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0850	ICR Reference No: 200710-1850-002
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 3419
Title: The Efficacy of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) and its Associated Training on Differentiated Instruction and Student Achievement
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 01/30/2008
	Date Received in OIRA: 10/24/2007
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	01/31/2011	36 Months From Approved
Responses	252	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	8,862	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Department of Education’s Institute for Education Sciences has commissioned this evaluation as a response to the current need for experimental research about the impacts of formative assessment on student achievement and teacher practice. This project will assess the efficacy of the Northwest Evaluation Association’s program entitled “Measuring Academic Progress” or MAP by looking at the impact on teacher practice and student achievement. The MAP intervention combines theory and research in two areas that have gained considerable attention in recent years: (1) formative assessment: (2) and differentiated instruction. MAP tests and training are currently in place in more than 10% of K-12 school districts nationwide (just over 2,000 districts participate among the approximately 17,500 districts). Despite its popularity, the effectiveness of the MAP and its training have not been established to date. Furthermore, the relative ubiquity of its current use, along with a projected growth in the number of schools investing in MAP and its associated training, makes it a prime candidate for this type of study.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 279 174 Name of Law: Education Science Reform Act of 2001
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 151	08/07/2007
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	72 FR 205	10/24/2007
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 2

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Fornative Assessment Study	NA, NA	Study Participation Agreement ,   Formative Assessment Study/Study Participation Agreement
Formative Assessment Study	NA, NA	Study Participation Agreement ,   Teacher Collaboration Survey

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	252	0	0	252	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	8,862	0	0	8,862	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new Collection

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $97,129

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 10/24/2007

---