60-day FR Notice

11552

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices

the staff of the Institute and discussions
concerning Institute programs.
Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Contact Person: Andrew P. Mariani, PhD,
Executive Secretary, National Advisory Eye
Council, Division of Extramural Research,
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451–2020,
[email protected].
Any interested person may file written
comments with the committee by forwarding
the statement to the Contact Person listed on
this notice. The statement should include the
name, address, telephone number and when
applicable, the business or professional
affiliation of the interested person.
Information is also available on the
Institute’s/Center’s home page: http://
www.nei.nih.gov, where an agenda and any
additional information for the meeting will
be posted when available.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research,
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: March 4, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–5175 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute on Drug Abuse;
Notice of Closed Meetings

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The contract proposals and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal in formation concerning
individuals associated with the contract
proposals, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of person al privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel Clinical
Coordinating Support for NIDA Center for
Clinical Trials Network (CCTN) (2221).
Date: April 6, 2010.
Time: 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate contract
proposals.
Place: Courtyard by Marriott Rockville,
2500 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD
20850.
Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review
Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs,
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH,

VerDate Nov<24>2008

16:35 Mar 10, 2010

Jkt 220001

DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892–8401, (301)
435–1439, 1f33c.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel Clinical
Worlds: Enhancing Substance Abuse
Provider Training Through Emerging
Technologies (5544).
Date: April 27, 2010.
Time: 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate contract
proposals.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review
Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs,
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH,
DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892–8401, (301)
435–1439, 1f33c.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel Drug
Scene Investigation Science (1138).
Date: April 28, 2010.
Time: 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate contract
proposals.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review
Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs,
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH,
DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892–8401, (301)
435–1439, 1f33c.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and
Addiction Research Programs, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: March 4, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–5171 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Intent To Request Renewal From OMB
of One Current Public Collection of
Information: Aviation Security
Customer Satisfaction Performance
Measurement Passenger Survey
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 60 day notice.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on one currently approved
Information Collection Request (ICR),
OMB control number 1652–0013,
abstracted below, that we will submit to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for renewal and amendment in
compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The ICR describes the

PO 00000

Frm 00048

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

nature of the information collection and
its expected burden. The collection
involves surveying travelers to measure
customer satisfaction of aviation
security in an effort to more efficiently
manage airport performance.
DATES: Send your comments by May 10,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be emailed
to [email protected] or delivered to the
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–40,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6040.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanna Johnson at the above address, or
by telephone (571) 227–3651.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
OMB Control Number 1652–0013;
Aviation Security Customer Satisfaction
Performance Measurement Passenger
Survey. TSA, with OMB’s approval, has
conducted surveys of passengers and
now seeks approval to continue this
effort. TSA plans to conduct passenger
surveys at airports nationwide. The
surveys will be administered using an
intercept methodology. The intercept
methodology uses TSA personnel who
are not in uniform to hand deliver paper
survey forms to passengers immediately
following the passenger’s experience
with the TSA’s checkpoint security

E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM

11MRN1

11553

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES

functions. Passengers are invited,
though not required, to complete and
return the survey via pre-paid postage,
which is prefixed to the survey, or
passengers may submit their responses
via an online portal. The intercept
methodology randomly selects
passengers to complete the survey in an
effort to gain survey data representative
of all passenger demographics—
including passengers who—
• Travel on weekdays or weekends;
• Those who travel in the morning,
mid-day, or evening;
• Those who pass through each of the
different security screening locations in
the airport;
• Those who are subject to more
intensive screening of their baggage or
person; and
• Those who experience different
volume conditions and wait times as
they proceed through the security
checkpoints.
The survey includes ten to fifteen
questions. Each question promotes a
quality response so that TSA can
identify areas in need of improvement.
All questions concern aspects of the
passenger’s security screening
experience.
TSA intends to collect this
information in order to continue to
assess customer satisfaction in an effort
to more efficiently manage airport
performance. In its future surveys, the
TSA wishes to obtain more detailed,
airport-specific data that the TSA can
use to enhance customer experiences
and airport performances. In order to
gain more detailed information
regarding customer experiences, the
TSA is submitting eighty-one questions
to OMB for approval. Twenty-eight of
the questions have been previously
approved by OMB and fifty-three
questions are being submitted to the
OMB for first-time approval. Each
survey question seeks to gain
information regarding one of the
following categories:
• Confidence in Personnel
• Confidence in Screening Equipment
• Confidence in Security Procedures
• Convenience of Divesting
• Experience at Checkpoint
• Satisfaction with Wait Time
• Separation from Belongings
• Separation from Others in Party
• Stress Level
TSA personnel select passengers
using a random method to voluntarily

participate in the survey until the TSA
obtains the desired sample size. The
samples can be selected with one
randomly selected time and location or
span multiple times and location. Each
airport may choose one or more of the
following sample methods, which
include a business card that directs
customers to an online portal, a
customer satisfaction card with survey
questions on the card, or a customer
satisfaction card with survey questions
on the card and a link to the online
portal. All responses are voluntary and
there is no burden on passengers who
choose not to respond.
TSA at airports have the capability to
conduct this survey. We estimate that
TSA at 25 airports will conduct the
survey each year. Based on prior survey
data and research, the TSA assumes a
maximum volume for the survey would
be 1,000 surveys per airport. We assume
the burden on passengers who choose to
respond to be approximately five
minutes per respondent. Therefore,
1,000 surveys × 25 airports = 25,000
respondents a year, the total burden is
25,000 × 5 = 125,000 minutes, or 2083.3
hours per year.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on March 3,
2010.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2010–5176 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5328–N–03]

Final Fair Market Rents for the Housing
Choice Voucher Program and
Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room
Occupancy Program for Fiscal Year
2010; Revised
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Notice of Final Fair Market
Rents (FMRs) for Fiscal Year 2010,
Update.
AGENCY:
ACTION:

SUMMARY: This notice updates the FMRs
for Reno-Sparks, NV, and Ward County,
ND, based on Random Digit Dialing
(RDD) surveys conducted in October
and November 2009.
DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information on the
methodology used to develop FMRs or
a listing of all FMRs, please call the
HUD USER information line at (800)
245–2691 or access the information on
the HUD Web site, http://
www.huduser.org/datasets/fmr.html.
FMRs are listed at the 40th or 50th
percentile in Schedule B. For
informational purposes, a table of 40th
percentile recent mover rents for those
areas currently at the 50th percentile
FMRs will be provided on the same
website noted above. Any questions
related to use of FMRs or voucher
payment standards should be directed
to the respective local HUD program
staff. Questions on how to conduct FMR
surveys or further methodological
explanations may be addressed to Marie
L. Lihn or Lynn A. Rodgers, Economic
and Market Analysis Division, Office of
Economic Affairs, Office of Policy
Development and Research, telephone
(202) 708–0590. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service
at (800) 877–8339. (Other than the HUD
USER information line and TTY
numbers, telephone numbers are not
toll-free.)

As the
result of comments submitted in
response to HUD’s notice of proposed
Fair Market Rents published on August
4, 2009 (74 FR 38716), HUD conducted
Random Digit Dialing (RDD) surveys for
the following FMR areas: Reno-Sparks,
NV Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA),
and Ward County, ND. These RDD
surveys began in October 2009 and were
completed in November 2009. The RDD
survey for Reno-Sparks, NV, indicated a
significant decline in the FMR, while
there was a significant increase
indicated by the RDD survey for Ward
County, ND. Both areas were having
significant problems administering the
Housing Choice Voucher program at the
then current FY2009 FMRs, and
anticipated continued difficulty under
the proposed FY2010 FMRs. As a result,
HUD is revising these FMRs as
published on September 30, 2009 (74 FR
50552), effective immediately.
The FMRs for the two affected areas
are revised as follows:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FMR by Number of Bedrooms in Unit
2010 Fair Market Rent Area
0 BR
Reno-Sparks, NV MSA ........................................................
Ward County, ND .................................................................

VerDate Nov<24>2008

16:35 Mar 10, 2010

Jkt 220001

PO 00000

Frm 00049

1 BR
$577
$425

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

2 BR
$690
$512

E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM

3 BR
$853
$631

11MRN1

$1,239
$872

4 BR
$1,498
$1,035