ICRA_AdCouncil_2010_final

SUPPORTING STATEMENT JUSTIFICATION FOR

FOOD SAFETY EDUCATION CAMPAIGN INITIAL EXPLORATORY RESEARCH

1. Circumstances Making Collection Of Information Necessary:

This is a request for a new information collection addressing paperwork requirements related to exploratory research for the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS)’s forthcoming public service advertising campaign on food safety.

The FSIS has been delegated the authority to exercise the functions of the Secretary as provided in the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.), and the Egg Products Inspection Act (EPIA) (21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq.). These statutes mandate that FSIS protect the public by verifying that meat and poultry products are safe, wholesome, unadulterated, and properly labeled and packaged.

FSIS, in partnership with the Ad Council, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Center for Disese Control, is developing a new national public service advertising campaign to educate the public about the importance of safe food handling and how to reduce the risks associated with foodborne illness. As part of the ongoing campaign development process, the Ad Council, on behalf of the Agency, proposes conducting information collections to assess the target audience’s perceptions, beliefs, and behaviors relating to food safety prior to the development of a campaign communications strategy to ensure an effective and insightful communications program.

FSIS is requesting approval for collecting information through the use of in-depth interviews with members of the campaign’s target audience. Interviews are an important information gathering technique because they allow for in-depth conversations with the target audience which provide insights that will inform the ultimate advertising strategy. And this initial exploratory collection will help to refine the campaign’s messaging goals.

The campaign will target parents, aged 20 to 40, who are caregivers for children between the ages of 4 and 12. Parents have been identified as the target audience because they are most likely to be preparing food for themselves and others, and they have an incentive to listen to food safety messages and adopt or change their behaviors as a result. The goal of this exploratory research is to learn more about the target’s perceptions, beliefs, and knowledge. All findings will be used by the volunteer advertising agency to develop a campaign strategy, and eventually, advertisements in support of the campaign objective. Once developed, the campaign advertisements will appear across a range of donated media platforms including TV, radio, print, outdoor, and online, with the goal of communicating the message to and inspiring behavior change in the target audience.

2. How, By Whom and Purpose Information Is To Be Used:

The following is a discussion of the required information collection and recordkeeping activities.

As a part of the pilot effort, the Ad Council on behalf of FSIS plans to conduct exploratory research to aid in the development of a campaign strategy and creative concepts. The Ad Council, working with a third-party research vendor and the volunteer ad agency, JWT, will conduct in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 30 screened parents in Houston, Philadelphia, and Chicago. The interviews will last one hour each and seek to assess attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors pertaining to food handling and food safety (i.e., clean, separate, cook, and chill), media habits, and demographic and personal information (annual household income, education level, and ethnic origin). It is expected that there will be about 214 non-respondents to the interviews, i.e., parents who are contacted but chose not to participate.

The data collected in the interviews will allow the Ad Council to probe the knowledge, perceptions, and beliefs that members of the target audience hold about food safety. The information collected will be used to help develop the campaign’s messages, materials, and approaches in order to improve its overall effectiveness. Addressing any issues identified during the exploratory research will help ensure that a planned, nation-wide Food Safety Education Campaign is successful in promoting behavior among the general population.

The methodology for the exploratory research being proposed is qualitative and is meant to help develop a communications strategy based on consumer insights. The results of this study will not be generalizable to the overall population and will not produce statistically significant data. However, conducting in-depth interviews allows the advertising agency to hear participants speak candidly about their views on the subject of food safety, which is invaluable to the creative development process, and will ultimately result in stronger advertising.

There are 65.3 total burden hours for the information collection request relating to the Food Safety Education Campaign exploratory research.

3. Use Of Improved Information Technology:

Respondents will be recruited via telephone and will visit a pre-selected research facility for an in-person interview.

4. Efforts To Identify Duplication:

This information is not available from any other source, either public or private.

5. Methods To Minimize Burden On Small Business Entities:

Only consumers will be surveyed.

6. Consequences If Information Were Collected Less Frequently:

This is a one time study.

7. Circumstances That Would Cause The Information Collection To Be Conducted In A Manner:

• requiring respondents to report informa­tion to the agency more often than quarterly;

• requiring respondents to prepare a writ­ten response to a collection of infor­ma­tion in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

• requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any docu­ment;

• requiring respondents to retain re­cords, other than health, medical, governm­ent contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

• in connection with a statisti­cal sur­vey, that is not de­signed to produce valid and reli­able results that can be general­ized to the uni­verse of study;

• requiring the use of a statis­tical data classi­fication that has not been re­vie­wed and approved by OMB;

• that includes a pledge of confiden­tiali­ty that is not supported by au­thority estab­lished in statute or regu­la­tion, that is not sup­ported by dis­closure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unneces­sarily impedes shar­ing of data with other agencies for com­patible confiden­tial use; or

• requiring respondents to submit propri­etary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demon­strate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permit­ted by law.

All information collection and recordkeeping activities in this submission are consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6.

8. Consultation With Persons Outside The Agency:

FSIS has consulted with the Ad Council and JWT in developing this research.

9. Payment or Gifts to Respondents:

The 30 respondents will receive payment of $75 for their participation in the interviews. This amount is comparable to the incentives that the Ad Council provides during market research across its PSA campaigns. While this incentive is higher than the amount typically provided during government consumer research, factors contributing to the higher cost include: 1) timing constraints that necessitate short turn-around for the research; 2) the narrow target audience – Since the research seeks to speak with a specifically defined target, incentive payments at standard private market research rates are essential. In addition, while the FSIS is the sponsor, the research is being conducted by a third-party research vendor and being identified to respondents as market research rather than a specifically government-sponsored project.

10. Confidentiality Provided To Respondents:

The vendor will include a statement about confidentiality for respondents that specifies that respondent data will not be called out specifically or identified with them personally. All reporting to FSIS will by anonymous and responses and findings will not be identifiable to any one respondent. While interviews will be videotaped, this is only for the purposes of report writing, and no video recordings – nor any personal information - will be retained by the FSIS or the research vendor.

11. Questions Of A Sensitive Nature:

The applicants are not asked to furnish any information of a sensitive nature.

12. Estimate of Burden

The total burden estimate for the reporting requirements associated with this information collection is 65.3 hours.

The Ad Council estimates that in order to recruit 30 respondents for in-depth interviews (IDIs), 214 will choose not to respond, resulting in a total of 244 respondents who will be contacted and screened for research via telephone - each responding once for 5 minutes. The 30 respondents who qualify for participation in IDIs will respond once more, participating in an IDI at the research facility that will take each participant an average of 90 minutes, including travel to and from the facility. The total burden for the exploratory research is 30 interview respondents and a total of 65.3 burden hours.

FOOD SAFETY CAMPAIGN EXPLORATORY RESEARCH

Type of Respon-dent	No. of Respon-dents	No. of Res- ponses per Respondent	Total Annual Responses	Time for Response in Mins.	Total Annual Time in Hours
Screening – respondents and non-respondents	244	1	244	5	20.3
Interviews – Respondents	30	1	30	90	45
Total	244	1	274	95	65.3

There are no costs to the respondents other than their time and modest transportation costs. The Agency estimates that it may cost respondents $12 an hour in loss of potential salary by participating in the survey. Respondents will spend a total of 65.3 hours and $786.6.

13. Capital and Start-up Cost and Subsequent Maintenance

There are no capital and start-up costs and subsequent maintenance burdens.

14. Annual Cost To Federal Government:

The cost to the Federal Government for these information collection requirements is $38,000. The costs arise from recruiting, data collection, analysis, and reporting.

15. Reasons For Changes In Burden:

There is a new information collection resulting in a program change of burden hours.

16. Tabulation, Analyses And Publication Plans:

There are no plans to publish the data for statistical use.

17. OMB Approval Number Display:

FSIS will display the OMB approval number on the interview guide.

18. Exceptions to the Certification:

There are no exceptions to the certification. This information collection accords with the certification in item 19 of the OMB 83-I.

Page 6