Generic Clearance for Geographic Partnership Programs

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Change Request_PUMA project in the generic PRA clearance_2.doc Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change	2011-03-15
1-02-09 Final GPP PRA SS rev 4-13.doc Supporting Statement A	2009-04-15

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
200273	School District Review Program, Verification Phase Other-Guidelines for viewing the updates and verifying those upd	New
199119	Phase 4 of the Redistricting Data Program Other-Phase 4 of the Redistricting Data Program Participant Inst	New
198734	2010 Census Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA) Program Other-PUMA program commencement email	New
198367	2011-2012 School District Boundary Review Program (SDRP) Other-Instructions on how to view current school district bounda	New
196314	Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Program Other-TAZ Participant Guidelines	Unchanged
191821	PSAP Verification Phase; TSAP Verification Phase; SDRP Verification Phase; Redistricting Data Program Verification Phase Other-PSAP-A standard guide for all participants that wish to su	Unchanged
191006	New Construction Program (Phase 2) Other-Enclosure letter	Unchanged
190851	Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) -- Feedback and Appeals Process Other-Liaison Letter Insert Appeals D1757(PR)	Unchanged
190552	2009 - 2010 School District Review Program (Annotation Phase) Other-Inventory of all school district in a state - provided to	Unchanged
189388	New Construction Program Other-Invitation Letter - HEO CC	Unchanged
189166	Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) Appeals Process Other-LUCA Feedback and Appeals Advance Mailing Letter	Unchanged

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0607-0795	ICR Reference No: 201103-0607-007
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200901-0607-001
Agency/Subagency: DOC/CENSUS	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Generic Clearance for Geographic Partnership Programs
Type of Information Collection: No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 03/29/2011
	Date Received in OIRA: 03/25/2011
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	04/30/2012	04/30/2012	04/30/2012
Responses	10,154	0	10,154
Time Burden (Hours)	557,930	0	557,930
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: A variety of geographic partnerships have been developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to include state, local and tribal entities in the update of census geographic information, which includes features, addresses and boundaries. The Census Bureau benefits from state or local knowledge, and the state or local entities benefit from a more accurate census geographic base for the 2010 Decennial Census, the American Community Survey (ACS), and other censuses and surveys.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 13 USC 16, 141, 193 Name of Law: null
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	73 FR 60675	10/14/2008
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 5915	02/03/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 11

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
New Construction Program	D-1746	Registration Form
2009 - 2010 School District Review Program (Annotation Phase)
Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) Appeals Process	D-1669, D-1667	Contact Info Update Form ,   Confidentiality Agreement
PSAP Verification Phase; TSAP Verification Phase; SDRP Verification Phase; Redistricting Data Program Verification Phase
School District Review Program, Verification Phase
2010 Census Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA) Program
Local Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) -- Feedback and Appeals Process
New Construction Program (Phase 2)
2011-2012 School District Boundary Review Program (SDRP)
Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Program
Phase 4 of the Redistricting Data Program

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	10,154	10,154	0	0	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	557,930	557,930	0	0	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The adjustment in burden is due to the fact that new programs will be conducted under the generic clearance. However, the burden of those new programs is less than the burden of those programs that were done under the clearance previously.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $11,600,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 03/25/2011

---