RTT Lead Semiannual Feedback Survey

Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

RTT Lead Semi-annual feedback_final_3 4 13

RTT Lead Semiannual Feedback Survey

OMB: 1880-0542

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

RTT Lead Survey

Audience: RTT Leads (19 states)

Format: Online Survey

Administration: Semi-Annually


Instructions:

The Reform Support Network (RSN) is committed to continuously improving the quality and delivery of technical assistance (TA) provided to Race to the Top (RTT) States. The RSN provides TA to grantees in the form of webinars, working groups, convenings, products, and individualized technical assistance through five communities of practice:

  • Teacher and Leader Effectiveness/Standards and Assessment

  • Instructional Improvement/Data Systems

  • School Turnaround

  • SEA Capacity Building

  • Stakeholder Communications and Engagement.


In order to better understand the perceived impact of RSN support in helping states work towards achievement of their RTT goals, we invite each RTT State Lead to complete a short survey. Please answer the following questions based upon your knowledge of the support provided through the RSN and how it has impacted education reform efforts in your state. You are not expected to have complete knowledge of your State’s participation in all RSN technical assistance. Please answer the questions from your point of view as the RTT State Lead.


1. How would you describe your State’s level of participation in all RSN TA activities and in each Community of Practice (CoP) over the past year?

Low

-

Medium

-

High

Not Aware (NA)

All RSN TA Activities

1

2

3

4

5

NA

CoP: Teacher & Leader Effectiveness / Standards and Assessment

1

2

3

4

5

NA

CoP: Instructional Improvement / Data Systems

1

2

3

4

5

NA

CoP: School Turnaround

1

2

3

4

5

NA

CoP: SEA Capacity Building

1

2

3

4

5

NA

CoP: Stakeholder Communications & Engagement

1

2

3

4

5

NA



2. How satisfied have you been with the support provided to your state in each of these core assurance areas and overall?

Very Dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Neutral

Satisfied

Very Satisfied

Not Aware (NA)

All RSN Support

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Teacher & Leader Effectiveness

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Standards and Assessment






NA

Instructional Improvement and Data Systems

1

2

3

4

5

NA

School Turnaround

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Building SEA Capacity

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Stakeholder Communications & Engagement

1

2

3

4

5

NA



3. Please rate the extent to which RSN support has helped build your State/staff capacity in the following areas?

Low

Impact

Medium-Low

Medium Impact

Medium-High Impact

High Impact

Not Aware (NA)

Overall RSN Support

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Teacher & Leader Effectiveness

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Standards and Assessment






NA

Instructional Improvement and Data Systems

1

2

3

4

5

NA

School Turnaround

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Building SEA Capacity

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Stakeholder Communications & Engagement

1

2

3

4

5

NA



4. Please rate the quality of RSN support provided to your State during RTT implementation:

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Not Aware (NA)

Usefulness/Relevance

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Timeliness/Responsiveness

1

2

3

4

5

NA

High-quality content

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Assistance for dealing with implementation challenges

1

2

3

4

5

NA



5. Please rate the level of impact of RSN technical assistance on strengthening or improving your State’s Race to the Top implementation in each of the below areas:

Low

Impact

Medium-Low

Medium Impact

Medium-High Impact

High Impact

Not Aware (NA)

Overall RSN Support

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Teacher & Leader Effectiveness

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Standards and Assessment






NA

Instructional Improvement and Data Systems

1

2

3

4

5

NA

School Turnaround

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Building SEA Capacity

1

2

3

4

5

NA

Stakeholder Communications & Engagement

1

2

3

4

5

NA



6. As a result of your participation in RSN technical assistance, how has your state changed or improved practice? (Please cite specific examples)




7. How can the supports provided by the RSN be improved to better meet the needs of your state? (Please cite specific examples)






8. Please rate the following areas where the RSN Teacher and Leader Effectiveness & Standards and Assessment CoP may provide support within your state according to their impact on your state reform efforts and also their urgency.

Impact on state reform (Rank top 3 areas with highest impact, 1-highest impact)

Urgency for state reform (Rank top 3 areas of highest urgency, 1-highest urgency)

Strengthening supports of instructional leaders



Continuous Improvement of teacher evaluation



Career Milestones



Ensuring equitable distribution of teachers



Teacher Preparation Pipelines



Effective implementation of college- and career-ready standards



Building effective and sustainable PD systems



Aligning college- and career-ready instructional expectations with educator evaluation initiatives





9. Please rate the following areas where the RSN SEA Capacity Building CoP may provide support within your state according to their impact on your state reform efforts and also their urgency.

Impact on state reform (Rank top 3 areas with highest impact, 1-highest impact)

Urgency for state reform (Rank top 3 areas of highest urgency, 1-highest urgency)

Human capital needs of the SEA



Regional delivery structures



Performance Management systems



External Partnerships





10. Are there other high-priority and urgent areas in which it would be helpful for the RSN to provide support to your state? (Please cite specific examples).


Public Burden Statement



According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average XX minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20202-4536 or email [email protected] and reference the OMB Control Number 1880-0542. Note: Please do not return the completed Customer Feedback Form to this address.





File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorAaron Pinter-Petrillo
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy