CSP Technical Working Group Meeting

Master Class One: Sustainable Support for High Quality Charter Schools

Strategic Review of the CSO Model: sustainability, shared services, and regional/cross state cooperation

February 11, 2014

Name: _________________________

Organization Name: _________________________

Title: _________________________

Section I

How many years of experience do you have working for a charter support organization?

□Less than 1 □1-2 years □3-5 years □More than 5 Years

How many years have you worked for your current charter support organization?

□Less than 1 □1-2 years □3-5 years □More than 5 Years

Section II

Rank the quality of the What’s Changed and What’s Still the Same? session (Quisenberry).

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Rank the quality of the CSO Needs Analysis session (Quisenberry, Broy, Kenen, Sigmund).

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Rank the quality of the What We’ve Learned: An Overview of Other Association Models

session (Diaz, Logan).

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Rank the quality of the CSO Regionalization in Action session (Phillips).

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Rank the quality of the Small Group SWOT Analysis session (Quisenberry, Diaz, Logan).

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Rank the quality of the Large Group SWOT Analysis session (Quisenberry, Diaz, Logan).

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Section III

Rank the overall quality of this Master Class.

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Rank the quality of the facility used at this Master Class session.

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Overall, was this Master Class presented in a format that was easy to understand?

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Overall, did you find the information provided in this Master Class session to be useful?

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

Overall, did this Master Class session improve your ability to conduct the activities described in your state?

□1 (poor) □(fair) □(good) □5 (excellent)

What was most valuable about this master class?

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

What can be improved?

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

What topics would you like to see addressed by future master classes?

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210-4537 or email [email protected] and reference the OMB Control Number 1880-0542 Note: Please do not return the completed Qualitative Feedback Survey to this address.

T hese materials have been developed for the National Charter School Resource Center funded by the U.S. Department of Education. The National Charter School Resource Center is led by Safal Partners under contract number ED-OII-13-R-005.