Download:
pdf |
pdfEarly Career Reviewers Survey
Page 1 of 5
Early Career Reviewers Survey
OMB Control Number: 0925-0474 Expiration Date 10/31/2014
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to
average 10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this
burden, to: NIH, Project Clearance Branch, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7974,
Bethesda, MD 20892-7974, ATTN: PRA (0925-0476). Do not return the
completed form to this address.
Thank you for participating in the Early Career Reviewer Program at the Center
for Scientific Review, NIH. We are in the process of evaluating the
effectiveness of this effort and we request your input. You are under no
obligation to participate in this survey.
1. For the review meeting that you participated in, did you
receive communications and orientation material to prepare
you from the SRO?
Yes
No
Not
sure
2. For the review meeting that you participated in, did you
receive communications and orientation material to prepare
you from the Chair?
Yes
No
Not
sure
3. Did you attend a pre-meeting orientation teleconference?
file://C:\Documents and Settings\dumaisc\My Documents\Early Career Reviewers... 4/19/2012
Early Career Reviewers Survey
Page 2 of 5
Yes
No
Not
sure
4. Considering your responses to questions 1) and 2) and
your own efforts, did you feel well-prepared for the peer
review meeting you attended?
Yes
No
Not
sure
5. If you answered 'not sure', what could have been done
to prepare you better?
6. Prior to the meeting, using Internet Assisted Review,
did you read any critiques or applications other than the
ones assigned to you?
Yes
No
If yes, how many?
7. A standard workload for a study section reviewer is 8
applications or more. ECR's were assigned to 1 or 2
applications. Considering your recent study section
experience and the other demands on your time and
effort, what do you think would be a reasonable workload
for an ECR?
file://C:\Documents and Settings\dumaisc\My Documents\Early Career Reviewers... 4/19/2012
Early Career Reviewers Survey
Page 3 of 5
8. During the meeting did you participate in the discussion
of applications other than those assigned to you?
Yes
No
If yes, how many?
9. On a 9-point scale where 1 means
Extremely Useful and 9 means Not at All
rate, how useful you think your input
was....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to the applications that you were assigned to review
meeting
to the review meeting in general
10. Overall, was the ECR experience useful to you? Please
add any comments.
Yes
No
Not sure
11. After the ECR experience do you believe you are better
positioned to write your own grant application?
Yes
No
Not sure
12. Will you participate in the NIH peer review process
again if invited?
Yes
No
file://C:\Documents and Settings\dumaisc\My Documents\Early Career Reviewers... 4/19/2012
Early Career Reviewers Survey
Page 4 of 5
Not sure
13. Would you recommend the ECR experience in peer
review to a colleague?
Yes
No
Not sure
14. Do you think the ECR program should continue?
Yes
No
Not sure
Thank you for your responses, please click on 'finish' to complete the
survey.
file://C:\Documents and Settings\dumaisc\My Documents\Early Career Reviewers... 4/19/2012
Early Career Reviewers Survey
Finish
Page 5 of 5
Save
file://C:\Documents and Settings\dumaisc\My Documents\Early Career Reviewers... 4/19/2012
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | file://C:\Documents and Settings\dumaisc\My Documents\Early Car |
| Author | dumaisc |
| File Modified | 2012-04-19 |
| File Created | 2012-04-19 |