4000-01-U
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Promoting the Readiness of Minors in Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE)
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
Overview Information:
Promoting the Readiness of Minors in Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE)
Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2013.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number:
84.418P
Dates:
Applications Available: [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
Deadline for Notice of Intent to apply: XXXX, 2013.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar: xxxx, 2013.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: [INSERT DATE 90 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: [INSERT DATE 150 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: Promoting the Readiness of Minors in Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE) is a joint initiative of the U.S. Department of Education (ED), the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to fund model demonstration projects (MDPs) in States to promote positive outcomes for children who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and their families. The purpose of this program is to improve the provision and coordination of services and supports for child SSI recipients and their families in order to achieve improved outcomes, such as completing postsecondary education and job training to obtain competitive employment in an integrated setting that may result in long-term reductions in the child recipient’s reliance on SSI. Furthermore, the goal for America’s educational system is that every child should graduate from high school ready for college and a career, regardless of their income, race, ethnic or language background, or disability status (U.S. Department of Education, 2010).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2013 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Applications submitted under this absolute priority may be a single State or a multi-State consortium1.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Promoting the Readiness of Minors Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE).
Background:
The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program for children provides cash payments to low income families that have a child with a severe disability based on SSA disability eligibility criteria and, in most States, entitles the child to Medicaid health care coverage. This means-tested cash payment is a vital source of income for families of children under the age of 18. To qualify for SSI, children and their families must meet income, asset, and disability eligibility criteria. To meet the SSI disability eligibility criteria, a child must have a medically determinable physical or mental impairment which results in marked and severe functional limitations, and which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted, or can be expected to last, for a continuous period of not less than 12 months (42 U.S.C. 1382(c)). In 2011, SSA paid roughly $9.4 billion to 1.3 million children with an average monthly payment of $592 per child. In 2012, the maximum per month payment for a child eligible for SSI was $698 (GAO 12-497).
As mandated in the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, child SSI recipients must have eligibility for SSI re-determined once they reach age 18 using the more stringent adult eligibility criteria.2 Approximately 60 percent of child SSI recipients receive SSI as an adult (Hemmeter et al., 2009). Of those who leave the program at age 18 either because they did not meet the adult SSI disability criteria or for other reasons, about one-fourth return to the program within 4 years (Hemmeter & Gilby, 2009). The probability of remaining on SSI varies substantially by recipient characteristics, but especially by the type and significance of the impairment experienced by the individual (Hemmeter et al., 2009).
The child SSI recipients who become adult SSI recipients continue to face many challenges. Rangarajan et al. (2009) report the following data (from 2000) for young adults with continuing payments:
Low educational attainment rates: 39 percent did not have a high school diploma and were not currently attending school. By comparison, only 11 percent of all young adults ages 16 to 24 had dropped out of school and had not received a diploma.
Low employment rates: 22 percent were employed in a job, compared with a 69 percent employment rate for all adults ages 20 to 24.
Low postsecondary enrollment rates: 6 percent were enrolled in some form of postsecondary education after graduating from high school, compared with 41 percent of all youth ages 18 to 23.
Low enrollment rates in vocational rehabilitation: Only 13 percent had ever received services from a State vocational rehabilitation agency.
High arrests rates: Approximately one-fifth had been arrested, which is consistent with other reports, (e.g., Quinn, Rutherford, Leone, Osher, & Poirier, 2005) indicating that 30 to 50 percent of incarcerated youth have disabilities that could qualify them for support services, such as special education.
High rates of disconnection overall: 57 percent were not enrolled in education programs, not receiving vocational rehabilitation (VR) services, and not employed.
Parents and other family members of child SSI recipients also face many challenges and are in need of support services. According to Davies, Rupp, and Wittenburg (2009), about one-third of the parents of child SSI recipients have less than a high school education, and almost half of these children live in a household with at least one other person with a disability. There also is clear evidence that child SSI recipients and their families lack information about various work incentives3 available to them to help them pursue activities that would increase self-sufficiency (Fraker & Rangarajan, 2009; Loprest & Wittenburg, 2005).
The structure of services to help children with disabilities who are SSI recipients transition from school to postsecondary education and competitive employment may also be a barrier to achieving self-sufficiency and independence. Not all child SSI recipients will receive transition services as an adult because many services, including vocational rehabilitation (VR) and mental health services, are not entitlements (Hemmeter et al., 2009). In addition, there are concerns related to gaps (e.g., differing eligibility requirements and goals) in the coordination of transition services provided by Federal, State, and local governments, as noted in a series of U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports over the past decade (GAO, 2003, 2008, 2012).
There have been calls to strengthen coordination among agencies to improve postsecondary education and employment outcomes for children with disabilities by (1) developing interagency partnerships that integrate educational and employment services and supports, including blending resources and providing waivers of Federal and State regulations; and (2) providing coordinated individual and family-centered interventions that utilize evidence-based transition services (SSA, 2003). Ideally, and where appropriate, child SSI recipients who are served under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) would receive coordinated transition services such as those available through IDEA, the Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants program, SSA’s Ticket Program and Work Incentives Program, Medicaid’s care coordination services, Job Corps, and other Workforce Investment Act programs.
Unfortunately, there is no strong evidence on the effectiveness of specific services for youth with disabilities who are transitioning from school to post-school activities. More research is needed to identify effective interventions, although there are some suggestive findings.4 In addition, the National Survey of SSI Children and Families (NSCF) found that the probability of remaining on SSI was substantially lower for those who were employed prior to age 18 (Hemmeter et al., 2009). Other correlational studies suggest that better post-school outcomes for children with disabilities may be linked with the following: (1) primary and secondary school activities such as inclusion in general education, exposure to career awareness and community activities, and education on skills such as self-awareness, self-advocacy, and independent living; (2) interagency collaboration; and (3) education and supports for the families, including ways to encourage parental participation in Individualized Education Program (IEP) Team meetings, financial and career planning courses, and transition plans for moving off of SSI (Test et al., 2009).
To address these concerns about barriers, to encourage new ways of providing support, and to build an evidence base on the effectiveness of promising interventions, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (P.L. 112-74) provided funds for activities aimed at improving the outcomes of child SSI recipients and their families. Specifically, the FY 2012 appropriation for Special Education included $2 million to support activities needed to plan and initiate implementation of the PROMISE initiative. In addition, the FY 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act included language that allows the Secretary to use amounts that remain available subsequent to the reallotment of funds to States under the Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants program pursuant to section 110(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, for improving the outcomes of child SSI recipients and their families under the PROMISE initiative. These funds, which remain available for Federal obligation until September 30, 2013, will be used to support PROMISE grant awards and related activities.
Children receiving payments under the SSI program need a continuum of coordinated services and supports to prepare for the transition to postsecondary education and competitive employment and to continue on a path to achieving economic self-sufficiency. Through the PROMISE program, ED intends to implement and evaluate State MDPs that will help to build an evidence base for practices that improve the educational and employment outcomes of child SSI recipients and their families.
Based on our review of the available research, extensive public input, and consultation with experts, ED believes that building effective partnerships will increase the likelihood of success of the PROMISE MDPs by improving the coordination of services and integrating multiple funding sources and other resources at the State and local levels, as well as contributing to their ability to effectively serve these individuals. We also believe that focusing on the needs of families, as well as children, may help further the long-term goal of independence and self-sufficiency for these child SSI recipients. In particular, we are interested in testing whether intervening with the child and family at an earlier age (14 to 16 years of age) will lead to better outcomes.
For this reason, each Promise project must have several core features including: (1) strong and effective partnerships with agencies responsible for programs that play a key role in providing services to child SSI recipients and their families; (2) a plan to provide a set of coordinated services and supports, and implement effective practices targeted to the needs of child SSI recipients and their families; and (3) the capacity to achieve results, including the capacity to implement the required project design and adhere to data collection protocols in order to test and rigorously evaluate the results of the project. The first four months of the project period will be used for planning and finalizing all aspects of the MDP, such as establishing formal partnerships, securing memorandums of understanding (MOUs) with the lead coordinating entity as described in the Eligibility Information section of this notice, and collaborating with the national evaluator to plan for participant outreach and recruitment.
In developing their MDPs, ED expects States to draw on their knowledge and experience in working with children and families with similar characteristics (i.e., those living in poverty and those with family members with disabilities), as well as on the relevant literature to identify innovative methods of providing services and supports that show potential to improve the economic self-sufficiency of these children and their families. However, based on the review of literature, input from non-Federal experts, and expertise of the Federal PROMISE partners, we have identified a small subset of services that each project will be required to provide. In addition, we have identified examples of other services and supports that we ask States to consider as they develop their MDPs (see Services and Supports under the Priority section of this notice).
Projects will be required to collaborate with, and provide data and information to, evaluators who will conduct a rigorous national evaluation of PROMISE under a contract administered by SSA. ED and its Federal PROMISE partners intend to use the findings and results of these projects to inform public policy and to build an evidence base for improving postsecondary education and employment outcomes of child SSI recipients and their families.
References:
Cobb, B., (forthcoming)
Davies, P. S., Rupp, K., & Wittenburg, D. (2009). A life-cycle perspective on the transition to adulthood among children receiving supplemental security income payments. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 30, 133-151.
Fraker, T., & Rangarajan, A. (2009). The social security administration’s youth transition demonstration projects. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 30, 223-240.
Hemmeter, J., & Gilby, E. (2009). The Age-18 Redetermination and Postredetermination Participation in SSI. Social Security Bulletin, 69(4).
Hemmeter, J., Kauff, J., & Wittenburg, D. (2009). Changing circumstances: Experiences of child SSI recipients before and after their age-18 redetermination for adult benefits. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 30, 201–221.
Loprest, P., & Wittenburg, D. (2005). Choices, Challenges, and Options: Child SSI Recipients Preparing for the Transition to Adult Life. Retrieved from The Urban Institute Web site: www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411168.
Quinn, M. M., Rutherford, R. B., Leone, P. E., Osher, D. M., & Poirier, J. M. (2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71, 339–345.
Rangarajan, A., Fraker, T., Honeycutt, T., Mamun, A., Martinez, J., O’Day, B., & Wittenburg, D. (2009). The Social Security Administration’s Youth Transition Demonstration Projects: Evaluation Design Report. Retrieved from www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_576.pdf .
Social Security Administration (SSA). (2003). Youth Demonstration Request for Applications. Program: Cooperative Agreements for Youth Transition Process Demonstrations (YTPD) (Program Announcement No. SSA-OPDR-03-01). Washington, DC: Author.
Test, D. W., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Fowler, C. H., Kortering, L. J., & Kohler, P. H. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160-181.
U.S. Government General Accountability Office. (2003, July). Special Education: Federal actions can assist states in improving postsecondary outcomes for youth (GAO-03-773). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Government General Accountability Office. (2008, May). Federal disability programs: More strategic coordination could help overcome challenges to needed transformation (GAO-08-635). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Government General Accountability Office. (2012, June). Supplemental security income: Better management oversight needed for children’s benefits (GAO-12-497). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Priority:
The purpose of this priority is to fund three to six cooperative agreements for three years with a two-year extension option to support the establishment and operation of State MDPs that are designed to improve the education and employment outcomes of child SSI recipients and their families, and eventually lead to an increased economic self-sufficiency and reduction in their dependence on SSI payments. At a minimum, the MDPs must--
(a) Develop and implement an MDP that includes interventions for child SSI recipients who are between the ages of 14-16 and their families. The MDP interventions should be based on the best available research evidence or data from State experience relating to coordinating, arranging, and providing services and supports for child SSI recipients and their families.
The MDP interventions should be designed to meet PROMISE’s expected goals (for both the children and their families), which include:
Increased educational attainment;
Improved rates of employment, wages/earnings, and job retention;
Increased total household income; and
Long-term reduction in SSI payments.
(b) Establish partnerships and subgrants with State
and local agencies and other entities to improve interagency collaboration in carrying out the MDP interventions and in developing innovative methods of providing services and supports through these partnerships that will lead to better outcomes for child SSI recipients and their families. For example, this could include better use of existing services, identification of gaps in services, and sharing resources, data, or other information so long as such sharing of data or information is permitted under any applicable laws or regulations that protect the confidentiality or privacy of personally identifiable information or records;
(c) Participate, and require any subgrantees or partners to participate, in collaboration with the national evaluator, in ongoing data collection and analysis, in a manner consistent with any applicable Federal and State laws or regulations that protect the confidentiality or privacy of personally identifiable information or records, both to determine the effectiveness of the MDP, including specific interventions, and to allow for mid-course corrections in the project as needed during the demonstration period, including--
(1) cooperate with the national evaluator in the
random assignment of eligible child participants and their families either to a group that receives the MDP interventions (treatment group) or to another group that receives services they would ordinarily receive (control group) and in the collection of data for the evaluation as permitted under applicable Federal and State law; and
(2) for ongoing program improvement purposes, design
and implement a plan for continually assessing the progress of the MDP intervention.
Application Requirements. To be considered for funding under this absolute priority, an applicant must include in its application--
(a) A description of the proposed project, including the applicant’s plan for implementing the project. The description must include--
(1) A cohesive articulated model of partnership and coordination among the agencies and organizations;
(2) A logic model that depicts, at a minimum, the goals, activities, outputs, and outcomes of the proposed project. The logic model must distinguish the contributions of each partner to the activities, outputs, and outcomes of the proposed project. A logic model communicates how a project will achieve its outcomes and provides a framework for the formative evaluation of the project; and
Note: The following Web sites provide more information on logic models: www.researchutilization.org/matrix/logicmodel_resource3c.html and www.tadnet.org/model_and_performance.
(3) Timeline for implementing the model and achieving project milestones and outcomes consistent with the logic model and the requirements of this priority.
(b) A description of the coordinated set of required
and other services and supports that the project proposes to provide to the children and their families participating in the project, in order to meet the project’s objectives. The description must describe how the services and supports will be provided, including whether the project will provide the services directly or will arrange for the services through its partners or other entities (see the Other Project Activities section of this notice related to the development and implementation of project services and interventions).
(c) A detailed description of any evidence that the services and supports proposed by the applicant have been implemented previously with the targeted population(s)of child SSI recipients and their families, or similar population, albeit on a limited scale or in a limited setting, has yielded promising results that suggest that more formal and systematic study is warranted. An applicant must provide a rationale for the coordinated set of services or supports that is based on research findings or reasonable hypotheses, including related research or theories in education and other sectors.
(d) A detailed description of the project’s proposed partners (see the Other Project Activities section of this notice related to establishing a partnership) that will play a key role in coordinating services and implementing the interventions in the proposed model, including a description of--
(1) The proposed partners’ roles and responsibilities under the project;
(2) The proposed partners’ commitment to the project and their responsibilities under the project, including letters of intent from the proposed partners to enter into an MOU with the lead coordinating entity as described in the Eligibility Requirements section of this notice;
(3) The plan to coordinate services among partner agencies and other entities to ensure that project resources are used efficiently; and
(4) The justification to exclude a required State partner, if applicable (described in paragraph (a)(3) of the Project Activities section of this notice).
(e) A description of the proposed outreach and recruitment plan, including--
(1) The methods and criteria for ensuring that the project will enroll at least 2,000 child SSI recipients and their families (described in paragraph (c) of the Eligibility Requirements section of this notice), including an assurance that the applicant will enroll a minimum of 2,000 child SSI recipients and their families in the project within two years of the start of the project.
(2) An assurance that the applicant will secure a signed written consent to participate in the project from the family and child, if applicable, that the consent form will be provided to the child and family in an accessible format, and that, as part of the consent process, participant requirements will be fully explained to the child and family and that participation in the program is voluntary on the part of the family, or child, if applicable. The consent form must also obtain any necessary written consent for the disclosure of personally identifiable information from relevant records, consistent with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA5) and the IDEA, and any other applicable Federal or State laws or regulations that protect the privacy or confidentiality of personally identifiable information or records, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act specifies privacy and security rules protecting health information. In addition, under the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program, the requirements in 34 CFR §361.38 (protection, use, and release of personal information) would apply to any records of participants in that program.
(f) A description of the applicant’s commitment to work with ED and SSA, and with a national evaluator for PROMISE to ensure that random assignment and data collection are completed in a manner that supports ED’s and SSA’s efforts to conduct a rigorous national evaluation of the PROMISE program and the specific interventions and strategies implemented by individual grantees. The application must include an assurance that--
(1) through MOUs with partners and other appropriate entities, project staff will assist with the random assignment of recruited children and their families; that the national evaluator and ED and SSA will be provided access to relevant program and project data sources (e.g., administrative data and program and project indicator data), and that, if requested, ED and SSA will be provided data on a quarterly basis.
(g) An assurance that the applicant will provide or arrange for technical assistance and training to ensure consistency in the implementation and evaluation of the MDP, including the fidelity of implementation of the MDP interventions.
(h) A description of the performance measures (and performance targets), including interim measures, the project will use to assess its performance and progress toward achieving its outcomes and goals, consistent with the logic model and the formative evaluation plan.
(i) A description of the data collection plan that--
(1) outlines how reliable and valid baseline data for program participants will be identified and collected;
(2) outlines the process for assessing, collecting,
and sharing participant data and other information among the collaborating agencies (outlined in paragraph (b) of the Data Collection section of this notice), in a manner consistent with any Federal or State laws or regulations that protect the confidentiality or privacy of personally identifiable information or records, to support the implementation and evaluation of the model; and
(3) identifies the systems or tools that will be used
for storing, managing, analyzing, and reporting data, including a description of the applicant’s capacity to track and manage project information, such as referrals and service participation, and document the services and supports received by the children and their families, and for communicating among the collaborating agencies to implement the model’s services, processes, and data plan.
(j) A description of the applicant’s plan, consistent with the proposed logic model and data collection plan, for conducting a formative evaluation of the proposed project’s activities/model, including--
(1) how formative participant and system data will be periodically collected, as appropriate, including data related to the fidelity of implementation, stakeholder acceptability, and descriptions of the site context;
(2) how these data will be reviewed by the project, when they will be reviewed (consistent with the timeline required in paragraph (a)(3) of the Application Requirements section of this notice), and how they will be used during the course of the project to adjust the model or its implementation to increase the model’s usefulness, generalizability, and potential for sustainability; and
(3) how the formative evaluation will use clear performance objectives to ensure continuous improvement in the operation of the proposed project, including objective measures of progress in implementing the project and ensuring the quality of products and services.
(k) A plan for attendance at the following:
(1) A one and one half-day kick-off meeting to be held in Washington, DC, after receipt of the award and an annual planning meeting held in Washington, DC, with the OSEP Project Officer during each subsequent year of the project period.
Note: Within 30 days of the receipt of the award, a post-award teleconference must be held between the OSEP Project Officer and the grantee’s Project Director or other authorized representative.
(2) A three-day Project Directors’ Conference in Washington, DC, during each year of the project period; and
(3) Three, two-day trips annually to attend Department briefings, Department-sponsored conferences, and other meetings, as requested by OSEP.
(l) A plan for coordination with an identified national evaluator selected and supported by SSA) that will conduct summative evaluations of the project.
Required Activities. To meet the requirements of this priority, each project, at a minimum, must conduct the following activities.
Partnerships
(a) Establish a formal partnership with agencies and organizations in the State that play or have the potential to play a substantial role in the development and implementation of policies and practices affecting child SSI recipients and their families and in the provision of services and supports to those children and their families.
(1) At a minimum, partners must include the State agencies or equivalents responsible for administering programs that provide the following services:
State vocational rehabilitation services under Title I of the Rehabilitation Act;
Special education and related services under Part B of the IDEA;
Workforce Development services under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), including Youth Services described in WIA (Section 129(c)(2));
Medicaid services under Title XIX of the Social Security Act;
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act;
Developmental/intellectual disabilities services; and
Mental health services.
(2) An applicant may propose a partnership that excludes a required State partner described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section if the applicant provides a strong justification for doing so. However, at least three of the required partners, including the lead coordinating entity, must participate in the partnership. A strong justification for excluding a required State partner may be an explanation of how the applicant will provide the required services and supports (described in Services and Supports, paragraph (b)(1)) and other proposed services and supports (described in Services and Supports, paragraph (b)(2)) to the child participants and their families without the participation of the required partner(s).
(3) In order to meet the requirements described in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section, applicants may propose to include an established State-level interagency entity such as a State Transition Coordinating Council.
(4) The applicant may propose other partners that the project believes would facilitate the success of the project such as Employment Networks under the Ticket to Work Program, employers or employer organizations, community colleges, institutions of higher education, independent living centers, and agencies that administer or carry out adult education programs, career and technical education programs, and maternal and child welfare programs.
(5) Establish procedures governing the exchange between the partners of any information protected by any applicable Federal or State laws or regulations that protect the confidentiality or privacy of personally identifiable information or records. This includes establishing procedures to ensure that personally identifiable information from education records is exchanged among the partners in compliance with the requirements of FERPA and the IDEA confidentiality of information provisions, which protect the privacy of personally identifiable information in education records and generally require consent for the disclosure of such information to third parties. Other privacy laws should also be considered.
Services and Supports
(a) Develop and implement MDP interventions for child SSI recipients and their families that include a coordinated set of services and supports designed to improve the education and employment outcomes of child SSI recipients and their families. The model should also include innovative methods of providing these services and supports, including coordinating and using resources available through existing programs or funding streams.
As part of its MDP, the applicant should propose an array of services and supports that it considers to have the best potential for improving education and employment outcomes (described in the Performance Measures section of this notice) for project participants. In selecting the services and supports to be provided, the applicant should consider the best available information on promising strategies and practices, including, where available, evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed strategies and practices.
(1) As a subset of the proposed services and supports, all projects must provide or arrange for the following--
(i) Case management: Each project must provide case management services for the duration of the project to ensure that services for the participating children and their families are appropriately planned and coordinated and to assist project participants in navigating through the services, supports, and benefits available from the larger service delivery system. Case management services must include at a minimum:
(A) identifying, locating, and arranging for needed services and supports for the children and their families;
(B) coordinating services provided directly by the project with other services that are available in the larger service delivery system; and
(C) transition planning to assist the participating children in setting post-school goals and to facilitate the transition of the participants to an appropriate post-school setting, including postsecondary education, training, and employment.6 Planning must be conducted in coordination with the local educational agency and, as appropriate, with similar local partners, such as the vocational rehabilitation agency, the State Medicaid Agency or other public insurance program, and workforce investment agencies;
(ii) Benefits counseling and financial capability services, including on-going training for the child participants and their families on SSA work incentives, eligibility requirements of various programs, earnings rules, asset accumulation, and financial literacy and planning. These services must be provided by a certified Community Work Incentives Coordinator;7
(iii) Career and Work-based learning experiences: At least one paid work experience in an integrated setting must be provided for children participating in the project before leaving high school. In addition, other work experiences must be provided, such as volunteering or participating in internships, community services, and on-the-job training experiences, including experiences designed to improve work place basic skills (sometimes called “soft skills”);
(iv) Parent training and information: At a minimum, the project must provide information and training to the family/parents of participating children with respect to:
(A) the parents’ role in supporting and advocating for their children’s education and employment goals, including the importance of high expectations for their children’s participation in education and competitive employment;
(B) resources for improving the economic self-sufficiency of the family, including through--
(I) the acquisition of basic education, literacy, and job readiness skills, and
(II) job training and employment services.
(2) The projects also must provide, or arrange for, such other services and supports that are needed, in combination with the required services, to improve education and employment outcomes of participating children and their families. Examples of other services that were suggested by the Federal agencies collaborating on PROMISE for consideration include:
Youth development activities: Examples include training in job seeking skills, life skills, independent living skills, self-advocacy, self-determination, and conflict resolution; exposure to personal leadership development and mentoring opportunities; and exposure to post-school supports through structured arrangements in postsecondary education settings and adult service agencies.
Career development/preparatory activities: Examples include career assessments to help identify career preferences, interests, and skills; career counseling and exploration, including structured exposure to postsecondary education and other life-long learning opportunities, exposure to career opportunities that ultimately lead to a living wage, and information about educational requirements, entry requirements, and income and benefits potential.
Extended and experiential learning opportunities in integrated settings.
Job search and job placement assistance, job development, and post-placement employment supports.
Activities designed to engage employers in providing work experiences and in employing participants of the project.
Health and behavioral management and wellness services, including transition to adult services.
Literacy training.
Training in the use of technology, assistive technology services and devices, including the use of assistive technology for education, training, and employment purposes.
Independent living activities such as assistance in locating and obtaining housing, health providers, and personal attendant services; transportation training and subsidies; child care services; and other community supports.
Participant Outreach and Recruitment
(a) Plan for and conduct activities to ensure that a minimum of 2,000 child SSI recipients and their families enroll in the MDP within two years of the start of the project. Such activities may include mailings, phone calls, informational meetings at State or local agencies or schools, home visits, and other efforts targeted to this population. To assist each funded project in identifying children, SSA will provide the lead coordinating entity with a list of such children and the available contact information.
As part of the plan for outreach and recruitment, the project must provide, with the national evaluator’s assistance, a recruitment packet that includes--
(1) A description of the full scope of the project
and the goals and objectives of the project with respect to participant outcomes and evaluation activities, including the use of random assignment to determine who will receive MDP interventions, and an explanation of what will be expected of the control group members (e.g., surveys at 18 and 60 months after the initiation of the project).
(2) An MDP enrollment form, developed by the
national evaluator that will include sufficient information to classify the data into subgroups for further analysis.
(3) A written consent form to participate in the project for the child and family using a form that will be developed jointly by the project and the national evaluator. As part of the consent process, the project requirements must be fully explained to the child and family, and the child, if appropriate, and family must sign the consent form. The consent form has two primary purposes. It must seek to obtain the parent’s or child’s written consent to participate in the program, explaining all relevant information in understandable language and in the parent’s native language or other mode of communication.8 Consent also must be obtained for the disclosure of personally identifiable information from relevant, privacy- protected records.
All outreach and recruitment materials and forms must be developed and provided in accessible formats for individuals with disabilities, using jargon-free easily-comprehended language, and provided in the family’s primary language or other mode of communication, unless it is clearly not feasible to do so. The national evaluator will assist in the development of these materials and forms.
Technical Assistance and Training
(a) Provide or arrange for technical assistance, professional development, and training for State and local staff who will carry out project and evaluation activities to ensure that the interventions are implemented in accordance with the State model and the needs of the national evaluation. At a minimum, the project must provide for the following:
Development of all necessary information and materials about the MDP interventions and project assessments, including the roles and responsibilities of all partners and staff at the State and local levels;
Twice-a-year meetings, located either at the location of the lead coordinating entity or at a central location in the State in which local site staff are required to participate and for which their participation is supported with project funds. The types of professional development and training to carry out the MDP interventions will be determined by the lead coordinating entity, its partners, and ED. The professional development will be provided by personnel from those entities or other experts. One or more sessions at the bi-annual meetings will be led by the national evaluator in order to train appropriate State and local staff on the evaluation requirements, including random assignment and data collection consistent with any applicable Federal or State laws or regulations that protect the privacy or confidentiality of any relevant data. The first bi-annual meeting must occur early in the first year of the project; and
Other ongoing technical assistance that the lead coordinating entity and its partners, including the national evaluator, determine is necessary for fidelity of implementation of the MDP interventions, and the evaluation and project assessment activities.
Evaluation and Project Assessment Activities
Each project must be designed to show progress in the key outcome measures to be evaluated under the PROMISE initiative (described in the Performance Measures section of this notice), as well as the other outcomes that a project proposes to measure. To meet the requirements of this priority, each project, at a minimum, must participate in the following activities.
Rigorous Program Evaluation
(a) SSA, in collaboration with ED, will conduct a rigorous evaluation of the PROMISE program using randomized controlled trials to obtain evidence of the effectiveness of the MDP interventions carried out under the PROMISE program. Projects and their designated partners at the State and local levels must:
Agree to allow random assignment to determine which half of the at least 2,000 children and their families recruited for the project will receive the MDP interventions (treatment group) and which half of the children and families will receive the services they ordinarily receive (control group);
Ensure that State or local site staff, wherever MDP enrollment forms are being collected, will assist in the random assignment process. This assistance will require staff to provide information from each child’s enrollment form (e.g., name, social security number, gender, disability, age) to the evaluator through a secure web-based random assignment system or a secure phone system. Both the web and phone systems will be developed by the national evaluator. After staff provide the data items that are necessary to conduct the random assignment, the results of the random assignment will be immediately available;
Ensure that State or local staff communicate the results of the random assignment to the child SSI recipients and their families;
Provide the MDP interventions only to the children and their families assigned to the treatment group; and
Agree to require State and local staff involved in the random assignment process to receive training from the national evaluator at the technical assistance and training meetings (described in paragraph (d)(2) of the Technical Assistance and Training section of this notice,) arranged by the State.
Formative Evaluation
(a) Develop and implement a plan for conducting a formative evaluation of the project’s activities/model, consistent with the proposed logic model and data collection plan, to assess the project’s performance and progress in achieving its goals and inform decision making.
Performance Measures
Each project must be designed to track its progress on the key outcomes to be evaluated under the PROMISE program as well as the other outcomes that a project proposes to measure.
(a) In collaboration with the national evaluator, the performance of the PROMISE program will be assessed on the basis of established key outcome measures for participating child SSI recipients and their families, as reflected in the goals of the program provided in the priority:
Increase educational attainment (high school completion, graduation (diploma or equivalent) and enrollment and persistence in postsecondary education, training, or the military;
Increase the number of individuals earning credentials after high school (e.g., postsecondary degree, technical certification, occupational licensure, or other industry-recognized credential);
Improve employment outcomes (e.g., competitive employment, average earnings, number of hours worked per week, job retention);
Changes in the use of public benefits provided to the individual or family (e.g., cash benefits and other benefits with directly measurable economic value);
Changes in total gross income of all the members of a household who are 15 years old and older (included in the total are amounts reported separately for wage or salary income; net self-employment income; interest, dividends, or net rental or royalty income or income from estates and trusts; Social Security or Railroad Retirement income; Supplemental Security Income; public assistance or welfare payments; retirement, survivor, or disability pensions; and all other income); and
Post-program reduction in SSI payments (e.g., differences between amounts of payments to children and their families who participated in the MDP interventions and the amounts paid to the other group randomly assigned to receive typical services).
(b) In addition to the key program outcome measures described in paragraph (c), each project must develop project measures that assess the project’s performance in achieving its goals consistent with the purpose of the priority and the project’s logic model.
(1) The set of project measures should include interim measures that assess the progress toward achieving the project’s outcomes, including the attainment of milestones and benchmarks consistent with the logic model. For example, the project may consider measures related to school attendance, project attrition, work experiences, enrollment in education or workforce development programs, or the use of partner-provided services for which the child participants and their families are eligible.
(2) The project must report progress and performance
on its measures at least quarterly and use this information to inform decision-making consistent with any applicable Federal or State laws or regulations that protect the privacy or confidentiality of any personally identifiable information in such systems.
Data Collection
(a) Develop and implement a plan for collecting data and for cooperating with the national evaluator in its efforts to obtain data and other information on the MDP. The plan must be designed to ensure that the project will:
Assist in collecting baseline (pre-program) data using the MDP enrollment form provided by the national evaluator.
Require project partners and staff at the State and local levels to cooperate with the national evaluator’s efforts to obtain descriptive information on project implementation such as through surveys, focus groups, or other methods.
Have the capacity to track and manage project information, such as referrals and service participation, and document the services and supports received by the child participants and their families.
Ensure the State administrative data collected by various State agency PROMISE partners are shared with the national evaluator, subject to obtaining required consent under FERPA and IDEA and any other applicable Federal or State laws or regulations that protect the privacy or confidentiality of personally identifiable information or records so as to permit the disclosure of this administrative data to the national evaluator. These State data may include information related to service provision, interim and long-term outcomes, or progress and performance identified in the priority or by the project. Examples of State administrative data include education records (e.g., transcripts, State assessment data, attendance records, high school completion data, postsecondary enrollment information) maintained by a State educational agency through its statewide longitudinal data system, employment and earnings information obtained through the State Unemployment Insurance system, service data collected by the State Vocational Rehabilitation system, and health records through the State Medicaid office.
Collect data to evaluate the performance of the PROMISE MDPs on the key outcome measures described in the Priority, and develop and implement a process to identify and collect the data needed to support project measures that assess the project’s progress and performance in achieving its goals consistent with the purpose of the priority and the project’s logic model, including making data available from its statewide longitudinal data systems.
The evaluation will require unique program identifiers that can be matched to various data systems.
Other Project Activities. To meet the requirements of this priority, each project, at a minimum, must conduct the following activities:
(a) Maintain ongoing telephone and email communication with the OSEP Project Officer and other PROMISE projects funded under this priority;
(b) Maintain detailed documentation sufficient for model replication purposes, should the model be successful, including the sources of support for services to participants (other than direct project funds) such as services provided through existing State and local programs;
(c) Communicate and collaborate on an ongoing basis with other federally funded projects to share information on successful strategies and implementation challenges regarding the coordination of services and supports for child SSI recipients and their families in achieving improved outcomes. ED will encourage ED-funded projects to cooperate with, and provide technical assistance to, PROMISE MDPs when appropriate. Examples of federally funded technical assistance centers and projects to consider in sharing information include the National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities (www.ndpc-sd.org), National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center (www.nsttac.org), State Implementation and Scaling-up of Evidence-based Practices Center (www.sisep.fpg.unc.edu), Postsecondary Education Programs Network (www.pepnet.org), IDEA Partnership (www.ideapartnership.org), National and Regional Parent TA Centers (www.parentcenternetwork.org), Parent Training and Information Centers, Community Parent Resource Centers, Independent Living Research and Utilization Project (www.ilru.org), National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth (www.ncwd-youth.info), Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers, The National Technical Assistance Center for Children's Mental Health (http://gucchdtacenter.georgetown.edu), The Solutions Desk on Helping Youth Transition (www.syvsd.ou.edu), Healthy & Ready to Work National Resource Center (www.syntiro.org/hrtw), TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health (www.tapartnership.org), and the National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention (www.promoteprevent.org).
(d) The project must maintain a Web site that includes relevant information about the MDP in a format that meets government or industry recognized standards for accessibility.
(e) Maintain contact with the national evaluator.
Fourth and Fifth Years of the Project:
In deciding whether to continue funding the project for the fourth and fifth years, the Secretary will consider the requirements of 34 CFR 75.253(a), and in addition--
(a) The recommendation of a review team consisting of experts selected by the Secretary. This review will be conducted during a one-day intensive meeting in Washington, DC, that will be held during the last half of the second year of the project period. The project must budget for travel expenses associated with this one-day intensive review;
(b) The timeliness and effectiveness with which all requirements of the negotiated cooperative agreement have been or are being met by the project including successful enrollment of at least 1,000 child SSI recipients and their families in the treatment group and 1,000 child SSI recipients and their families in the control group; and
(c) The quality, relevance, and usefulness of the project’s activities and products; the degree to which the project’s activities and products are aligned with the project’s objectives; and the likelihood that current performance and progress will result in the project achieving its proposed outcomes.
Waivers:
Waivers may apply to States, agencies, programs, children, or families. ED recognizes that proposed innovations may be enhanced by waivers of Federal laws or regulations; however, the waiver request should not be included in the application. Applicants may develop a waiver request, and if selected for funding, applicants may submit the waiver request for consideration. Whether waivers will be allowed will be at the sole discretion of the relevant Federal or State agency, consistent with applicable Federal laws and regulations. For example, waivers of SSA program rules will be approved or denied by SSA. Waiver requests not currently allowed by existing law will require Congressional authorization.
Invitational Priority:
Under this competition we are particularly interested in applications that address the following priority. For FY 2013 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, this priority is an invitational priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we do not give an application that meets this invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over other applications.
This priority is Outcome-Based Payments.
The Secretary is especially interested in applicants that propose to incorporate into their PROMISE MDP an Outcome-based Payment (OBP) model that ties payments to providers based on the achievement of outcomes or established milestones.
The OBP model has been used in the health-care arena to offer financial rewards to providers who achieve, improve, or exceed their performance on specified quality, cost, and other benchmarks. Under an OBP arrangement, providers are rewarded for meeting pre-established targets for delivery of services thus creating an incentive to meet performance objectives. This arrangement is a fundamental change from the fee-for-service payment model. However, for OBP arrangements to be effective, all the factors that affect performance must be considered including: motivation, skills, an understanding of the goals, and the ability to measure progress. For example, one type of OBP model is performance-based contracting. Performance-based contracts use appropriate techniques, which may include but are not limited to, consequences and incentives to ensure that agreed upon value is received. Listed below are key characteristics of performance-based contracts:
Emphasize results related to output, quality, and outcomes rather than how the work is performed;
Specify deliverables, performance standards, and an outcomes orientation and clearly defined objectives and timeframes;
Use quality assurance plans, measurable performance standards, and outcomes;
Provide performance incentives and consequences for nonperformance; and
Tie payment to deliverables, performance measures and outcomes.
In inviting OBP models, ED is interested in demonstrating how this payment model can help achieve positive outcomes for children and their families participating in the project, consistent with those identified in this priority. ED’s objectives in establishing this OBP invitational priority are to:
Test a model that limits at least part of the risk
of government funding for unachieved outcomes by clearly defining performance-based consequences (rewards or sanctions) for service providers.
Learn whether the OBP concept is feasible in this
arena given the complexity of needs and number of agencies involved in serving child SSI recipients and their families.
Determine whether paying only for specific outcomes
achieved at predetermined milestones within the grant period creates an incentive structure that promotes the achievement of PROMISE’s goals.
ED acknowledges that incorporating an OBP model
into an applicant’s proposed PROMISE project may be challenging, particularly for recruiting providers, measuring outcomes, and specifying contractual arrangements. Applicants that address this invitational priority should include a plan for implementing the OBP model during the project. The applicant must clarify the payment arrangement between the applicant and the provider, to be triggered by the verified achievement of the proposed outcome(s) and any milestones within the grant period. The plan must describe a validation methodology and a payment plan that is derived from quantifiable data, and measures against outcome targets for the target population relative to a well-defined comparison population. This plan must include a timeline describing each payment point that the project partners have agreed to and the corresponding outcome targets.
For more information, see the following Web sites:
www.massmed.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home6&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=30254
www.ofm.wa.gov/contracts/resources/performance_base/
DEFINITIONS:
Background:
The following definitions are provided to ensure that applicants have a clear understanding of how we are using these terms in the proposed priority. We may apply one or more of these definitions in any year in which this program is in effect. These definitions are based on definitions that the Department uses or relies on in other contexts.
Competitive Employment means work in the competitive labor market that is performed on a full-time or part-time basis, in an integrated setting, and for which an individual is compensated at or above the minimum wage, but not less than the customary wage and level of benefits paid by the employer for the same or similar work performed by individuals who are not disabled. Competitive employment may include self-employment. The source for this definition: http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/410/~/definition-of-earned-income-for-ssi-purposes.
Extended and Experiential Learning Opportunities:
Extended learning opportunities (ELOs) provide safe, structured learning environments for students outside the traditional school day. ELOs include afterschool and summer learning programs as well as before-school, evening, and weekend programs. ELOs come in many forms and can include tutoring, volunteering, academic support, community service, organized sports, homework help, and art and music programs. The source for this definition: www.ccsso.org/Documents/2009/The_Quality_Imperative_a_2009.pdf.
Experiential Learning is learning through experience. The individual is encouraged to directly involve him or herself in the experience, and then reflect on the experiences using analytic skills, in order to gain a better understanding of the new knowledge and retain the information. The source for this definition: www.infed.org/biblio/b-explrn.htm.
Fidelity of Implementation means the delivery of the intervention in the way in which it was designed to be delivered: accurately and consistently. The source for this definition: www.nrcld.org/rti_manual/pages/RTIManualSection4.
Families: The definition of family member covers a wide range of relationships, including spouse; parents; parents-in-law; children; brothers; sisters; grandparents; grandchildren; step parents; step children; foster parents; foster children; guardianship relationships; same sex and opposite sex domestic partners; and spouses or domestic partners of the aforementioned, as applicable. The source for this definition: www.opm.gov/oca/leave/html/FamilyDefs.asp.
Integrated Setting, as used in the context of employment outcomes, means a setting typically found in the community in which individuals with disabilities interact with non-disabled individuals, other than non-disabled individuals who are providing services to such individuals, to the same extent that non-disabled individuals in comparable positions interact with other persons. The source for this definition: State Rehabilitation Services Program, 34 CFR 361.5(b)(33)(ii).
Logic model means a well-specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the proposed practice, strategy, or intervention (i.e., the active “ingredients” that are hypothesized to be critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the relationships among the key components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally.
Parent: The term parent means:
(a) a natural, adoptive, or foster parent of a child (unless a foster parent is prohibited by State law from serving as a parent);
(b) a guardian (but not the State if the child is a ward of the State); and
(c) an individual acting in the place of a natural or adoptive parent (including a grandparent, stepparent, or other relative) with whom the child lives, or an individual who is legally responsible for the child's welfare.
(d) except as used in sections 615(b)(2) and
639(a)(5), an individual assigned under either of those sections to be a surrogate parent.
The source for this definition: IDEA, 20 U.S.C. 1401(23).
Personally Identifiable Information includes, but is
not limited to, the following--
(a) The student's name;
(b) The name of the student's parent or other family members;
(c) The address of the student or student's family;
(d) A personal identifier, such as the student's social security number, student number, or biometric record;
(e) Other indirect identifiers, such as the student's date of birth, place of birth, and mother's maiden name;
(f) Other information that, alone or in combination, is linked or linkable to a specific student that would allow a reasonable person in the school community, who does not have personal knowledge of the relevant circumstances, to identify the student with reasonable certainty; or
(g) Information requested by a person who the educational agency or institution reasonably believes knows the identity of the student to whom the education record relates.
The source for this definition: 34 CFR §99.3 of the FERPA regulations; see also 34 CFR §300.32 of the IDEA regulations.
Transition Services means a coordinated set of
activities for a child with a disability that:
Is designed to be within a results-oriented process, that is focused on improving the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate the child's movement from school to post-school activities, including postsecondary education, vocational education, integrated employment (including supported employment); continuing and adult education, adult services, independent living, or community participation;
Is based on the individual child's needs, taking into account the child's strengths, preferences, and interests; and
Includes instruction, related services, community experiences, the development of employment and other post-school adult living objectives, and, if appropriate, acquisition of daily living skills and functional vocational evaluation.
The source for this definition: IDEA, 20 U.S.C. 1401(34).
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), ED generally offers interested parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities. Section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), however, allows the Secretary to exempt from rulemaking requirements and regulations governing the first grant competition under a new or substantially revised program authority. This is the first grant competition for this initiative, as authorized under the Fiscal Year 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act, and therefore qualifies for this exemption. Due to the extensive public input received in the development of this priority, and in order to ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has decided to forego formal public comment on the proposed absolute priority under section 437(d)(1)of GEPA. The Secretary has gathered input on the proposed grant requirements through a public input notice.
Program Authority: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (P.L. 112-74).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts XXXXX
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative agreements.
Estimated Available Funds: [Insert here the total amount for this competition (e.g., $40,000,000).]
Estimated Range of Awards: $4,500,000 - $10,000,000.
Estimated Average Award Size:
Estimated Number of Awards: 3 to 6.
Maximum Award: We will reject any application that proposes a budget exceeding $10,000,000 for a single budget period of 12 months. The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services may change the maximum amount through a notice published in the Federal Register.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months with an optional additional 24 months based on performance, commencing within 1 year of the announcement of the awards. Projects may use this year for planning and recruitment prior to the start of service delivery. Applications must include plans for both the 36-month award and the 24-month extension.
III. Eligibility Information
Eligible Applicants: Eligible applicants are the
50 States and the District of Columbia. A consortium of States may also apply. An applicant must meet the following requirements to be eligible to compete for funding under this program:
Single State applicant. A single State with
adequate child SSI recipients, as described in paragraph (a) of the Participant Outreach and Recruitment section, may apply. The State applicant must:
Designate a lead coordinating entity, which must
be a State agency; and
the application must be signed by the State’s
Governor and the administrative head of the lead coordinating entity.
Consortium of States applicant. A consortium of
States may also apply in order to meet the eligibility requirements, as described in paragraph (a) of the Participant Outreach and Recruitment section.
Each of the consortium States must designate a
lead coordinating entity, which must be a State agency; and
The application must be signed by the Governor
of each State and the administrative head of each lead coordinating entity.
(c) The lead coordinating entity must partner with other State agencies and is encouraged to partner with local agencies and organizations that play or have the potential to play a substantial role in the development and implementation of policies and practices affecting child SSI recipients and their families (see related project and application requirements).
(d) The State or consortium of States must have a sufficient number of children between the ages of 14 and 16 who receive SSI to recruit the minimum sample size of 2,000 child SSI recipients into the MDP (within two years of the start of the project) and provide MDP interventions to half of those recruited. This sample size is necessary to assess the effectiveness of each MDP. Each MDP will be evaluated separately because ED and its Federal PROMISE partners expect grantees to vary in their approaches to implementing PROMISE (see related Evaluation and Project Assessment Activities).
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost sharing or matching.
3. Other: General Requirements--(a) The projects funded under this competition must make positive efforts to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities (see section 606 of IDEA).
(b) Applicants and the grant recipients funded under this competition must involve individuals with disabilities or parents of individuals with disabilities ages birth through 26 in planning, implementing, and evaluating the projects (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of IDEA).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: You can obtain an application package via the Internet, from the Education Publications Center (ED Pubs), or from the program office.
To obtain a copy via the Internet, use the following address: www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/grantapps/index.html.
To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write, fax, or call the following: ED Pubs, U.S. Department of Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304. Telephone, toll free:
1-877-433-7827. FAX: (703) 605-6794. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call, toll free: 1-877-576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at its email address: [email protected].
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to identify this competition as follows: CFDA Number 84.TBD.
To obtain a copy from the program office, contact the person listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII of this notice.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) by contacting the person or team listed under Accessible Format in section VIII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
Notice of Intent to Apply: ED will be able to develop
a more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if it has a better understanding of the number of entities that intend to apply for funding under this competition. Therefore, the Secretary strongly encourages each potential applicant to notify ED by sending a short email message indicating the applicant’s intent to submit an application for funding. The email need not include information regarding the content of the proposed application only the applicant’s intent to submit it. This email notification should be sent to Corinne Weidenthal at [email protected].
Applicants that fail to provide this email
notification may still apply for funding.
Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of
the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. You must limit Part III to the equivalent of no more than 100 pages, using the following standards:
• A “page” is 8.5" x 11", on one side only, with 1" margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts, table, figures, and graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial. An application submitted in any other font (including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the page limit does apply to all of the application narrative section (Part III).
We will reject your application if you exceed the page limit; or if you apply other standards and exceed the equivalent of the page limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
Date of Pre-Application Webinar:
Interested parties are invited to participate in a pre-application webinar and to receive information and technical assistance through individual consultation with OSEP staff. The pre-application webinar will be held on xxxxxx, 2013. Interested parties may participate in this webinar with OSEP staff from the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services between xxx a.m. and xxx p.m., Washington, DC time. OSEP staff also will be available from xxx a.m. to xxx p.m., Washington, DC time, on the same day, by telephone, to provide information and technical assistance through individual consultation. For further information or to make arrangements to participate in the webinar or for an individual consultation, contact Corinne Weidenthal as follows: Corinne Weidenthal, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Room 4115, Washington, DC 20202–2600. Telephone: (202) 245–6529 or by email: [email protected].
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: xxxx, 2013.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: [INSERT DATE 90 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For information (including dates and times) about how to submit your application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, please refer to section IV. 7. Other Submission Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact the person listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the application process, the individual's application remains subject to all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: [INSERT DATE 150 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification Number, Central Contractor Registry, and System for Award Management: To do business with the Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR)--and, after July 24, 2012, with the System for Award Management (SAM), the Government’s primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active CCR or SAM registration with current information while your application is under review by the Department and, if you are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number can be created within one business day.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service. If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a new TIN, please allow 2-5 weeks for your TIN to become active.
The CCR or SAM registration process may take five or more business days to complete. If you are currently registered with the CCR, you may not need to make any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update your registration annually. This may take three or more business days to complete. Information about SAM is available at SAM.gov.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov, you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp.
7. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted electronically unless you qualify for an exception to this requirement in accordance with the instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under the PROMISE competition, CFDA number 84.TBD, must be submitted electronically using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the PROMISE competition at www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable application package for this competition by the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA number’s alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.TBD, not 84.TBDx).
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find information about submitting an application electronically through the site, as well as the hours of operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to upload an application will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the Education Submission Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are included in the application package for this competition to ensure that you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department’s G5 system home page at www.G5.gov.
• You will not receive additional point value because you submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents electronically, including all information you typically provide on the following forms: the Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications.
• You must upload any narrative sections and all other attachments to your application as files in a PDF (Portable Document) read-only, non-modifiable format. Do not upload an interactive or fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only, non-modifiable PDF or submit a password-protected file, we will not review that material. Additional, detailed information on how to attach files is in the application instructions.
• Your electronic application must comply with any page-limit requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit your application, you will receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send a second notification to you by email. This second notification indicates that the Department has received your application and has assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified identifying number unique to your application).
• We may request that you provide us original signatures on forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your application on the application deadline date because of technical problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII of this notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application through the Grants.gov system because––
• You do not have access to the Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to the Grants.gov system;
and
• No later than two weeks before the application deadline date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception prevent you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Corinne Weidenthal, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 4115, Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2600. FAX: (202) 245-7617.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail the original and two copies of your application, on or before the application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.TBD)
LBJ Basement Level 1
400 Maryland Avenue, SW.
Washington, DC 20202-4260
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.TBD)
550 12th Street, SW.
Room 7041, Potomac Center Plaza
Washington, DC 20202-4260
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not receive this notification within 15 business days from the application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Process and Evaluation Criteria
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition are from 34 CFR 75.210 and additional selection criteria appropriate for PROMISE. They are:
(a) Quality of project design (35 points).
(1)
The extent to which the MDP identifies and plans to address gaps and
weaknesses in current State service systems for child SSI recipients
and their families.
(2) The
extent to which the MDP’s interventions are likely to meet
the needs of child SSI recipients and their families, and achieve
desired outcomes.
(3) The extent to which the applicant documents that proposed services and supports are based on the best available evidence including, if available, research that has demonstrated statistically significant positive effects using the strongest possible study designs such as those that meet the standards of the What Works Clearinghouse9.
(4) The extent to which the budget is adequate to support the proposed MDP, including whether costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed project.
(5) The extent to which the MDP has clearly articulated a model of partnership, coordination, and service delivery that includes:
(i) an explicit and comprehensive strategy, with actions that are expected to result in achieving the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed project; and
(ii) measurable and attainable goals and their benchmarks that are supported by quantitative projections of the projected accomplishments for each activity, the number of activities to be accomplished, and a chronological order of approach with target dates.
(6) Quality of the logic model and project implementation plan, and timeline, including the extent to which there is a conceptual framework underlying the demonstration activities and the quality of that framework.
(b) Quality of participant recruitment plan (25 points)
(1) The extent to which the MDP has clearly articulated a realistic outreach and recruitment plan that is likely to lead to at least 2000 child SSI recipients and their families enrolling in the MDP.
(c) Quality of management plan and personnel (35 points).
(1) The adequacy of the management plan that is designed to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget.
(2) The adequacy of partnerships within the State or consortium that are designed to achieve project objectives, including:
(i) an overall management plan for the partnerships, including mechanisms for coordinating across agencies and organizations. The plan should also describe how the partnership will be organized to carry out the project, including clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each partner;
(ii) the extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners, including at least three of the required partners, to maximize the impact of the MDP;
(iii) the relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project. Commitment of the partners should be demonstrated in the form of memorandums of understanding (MOUs), substantive non-form letters of intent, or other documents that show strategic relationships are preferably already in place, that the partners have prior experience collaborating to serve low-income children with disabilities, that each partner understands its roles and responsibilities, and that the leadership of each partner entity supports the proposed activities; and
(iv) a system for holding partners accountable for performance in accordance with the MOU, letters of intent, or other commitments among the partners.
(3) The capacity of the project to execute necessary data collection protocols and requirements in a high-quality manner, including:
(i) implementing a process to collect the data needed to track the outcome measures required in this notice, project-specific measures, and other necessary information over time and across partner agencies and organizations;
(ii) adequately documenting project activities, referrals, services and supports received by each child SSI recipient and his or her family, and any resulting State systems change; and
(iii) cooperating with the national evaluator on all matters necessary to undertake rigorous evaluation and measurement of the project.
(4) The quality of key personnel, including:
(i) A qualified and sufficient staffing pattern to accomplish the goals of the project, including techniques to ensure that an adequate supply of qualified staff are enlisted in a timely manner;
(ii) The extent to which there is evidence that key project staff, by virtue of their training or professional experience, have the requisite knowledge to design, implement, and manage projects of the size and scope of the proposed project; and
(iii) The extent to which the identified key personnel have the requisite authority to commit their agency and its resources to the implementation of the project.
C. Significance (20 points)
(1) The extent to which the proposed project will result in systems change and improvement.
(2) The potential contribution of the proposed project to the development and advancement of knowledge, and practices in the field.
(3) The extent to which the project is designed to raise the expectations held by, and about, participating child SSI recipients regarding their education and employment outcomes.
(4) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely to be attained by the proposed project.
D. Capacity for Continuous Feedback and Improvement (10 points)
(1) The adequacy of plans and procedures for ensuring continuous feedback and improvement in the implementation of the proposed project.
(2) The capacity for incorporating child and family feedback, including:
(i) The extent to which the proposed project seeks, encourages, and includes parental involvement and feedback; and
(ii) The extent to which the proposed project seeks, encourages, and includes feedback from participating child SSI recipients and encourages their self-determination.
2. Review and Selection Process: The Department will screen applications submitted in accordance with the requirements in this notice, and will determine which applications have met eligibility requirements and other requirements in this notice. Additional information about the review process will be published on the program’s Web site.
We remind potential applicants that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the applicant’s use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary also requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Additional Review and Selection Process Factors: In the past, the Department has had difficulty finding
4. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR 74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary may impose special conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system that does not meet the standards in 34 CFR parts 74 or 80, as applicable; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and national policy requirements in the application package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your approved application as part of your binding commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department has established a set of performance measures, including long-term measures, that are designed to yield information on various aspects of the effectiveness and quality of the Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities program. These measures focus on the extent to which projects provide high-quality products and services, the relevance of project products and services to educational and early intervention policy and practice, and the use of products and services to improve educational and early intervention policy and practice.
Grantees will be required to report information on their project’s performance in annual reports to the Department (34 CFR 75.590).
5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.253, the extent to which a grantee has made “substantial progress toward meeting the objectives in its approved application.” This consideration includes the review of a grantee’s progress in meeting the targets and projected outcomes in its approved application, and whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is consistent with its approved application and budget. In making a continuation grant, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
For Further Information Contact: Corinne Weidenthal, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., room 4115, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2600. Telephone: (202) 245-6529.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) by contacting the Grants and Contracts Services Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363. If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department.
Dated:
__________________________________
Michael K. Yudin,
Acting Assistant Secretary
for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
1 Applicants are invited to form consortia consistent with the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR 75.127 to 75.129. A consortium is comprised of more than one State and could include States from the same geographic region, States with similar demographic characteristics, States with similar populations, States with similar geographic characteristics, or other characteristics as determined by the States. The Secretary views the formation of consortia as an effective and efficient strategy to address the requirements of this priority. See the Eligibility Information section for further information.
2 “Using the adult program rules, eligibility is based on the inability to perform substantial gainful activity.” Retrieved from: Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 69. No 4. 2009 (www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v69n4/index.html).
3 Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs include a number of employment support provisions commonly referred to as “work incentives.” Additional information about SSI work incentives is available at www.socialsecurity.gov/redbook/eng/ssi-only-employment-supports.htm#2.
4 A forthcoming review of the rigor and results of research on transition over the last two decades finds that few conclusions about what works can be drawn with confidence (Cobb et al., forthcoming).
5 Applicants must ensure the confidentiality of individual data, consistent with the requirements of FERPA, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g, the confidentiality of information provisions in section 617(c) of the IDEA, and any other applicable Federal or State laws or regulations protecting the privacy or confidentiality of personally identifiable information or records. FERPA generally prohibits school districts and schools that receive federal funds from the U.S. Department of Education from disclosing student information that alone, or in combination with other information, can identify that student, without the prior written consent of a parent or the student (if that student is 18 years of age or older and attends a postsecondary institution). See 20 U.S.C. § 1232g and 34 CFR §99.30. However, certain disclosures may occur without parental consent or the consent of an eligible student 18 years of age or older or who is attending an institution of postsecondary education under one of FERPA’s specific exceptions to the prior consent requirement. See 34 CFR §99.31. In general and consistent with FERPA, IDEA’s confidentiality of information provisions require prior written consent for disclosures of personally identifiable information contained in education records, unless a specific exception applies (20 U.S.C. 1417(c) and 34 CFR §300.622). Questions about FERPA can be forwarded to the Family Policy Compliance Office (www.ed.gov/fpco) at (202) 260-3887 or [email protected].
6 Under the IDEA, if the public agency convenes an IEP Team meeting to consider the child’s postsecondary goals and the transition services needed to assist the child in reaching those goals, to the extent appropriate, with the consent of the parents or a child who has reached the age of majority, the public agency must invite a representative of any participating agency that is likely to be responsible for providing or paying for transition services to that meeting (34 CFR §300.321(b)(3)).
7 Community Work Incentives Coordinator is the term for an individual under WIPA (Work Incentives Planning and Assistance) who provides benefit counseling and other services to assist individuals who are receiving SSI or Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and are working or planning to work. SSA certifies Community Work Incentives Coordinators after they have completed training.
8 See the IDEA definition of consent in 34 CFR §300.9.
9 The What Works Clearinghouse uses objective and transparent standards and procedures to make its assessment of the scientific merit of studies of the effectiveness of education interventions, and then summarizes the results of its systematic reviews in a set of products. For further information: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| Author | laurie collins |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2021-01-31 |