Customer Satisfaction Survey: Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines

DOI Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

WEG survey instrument rev

Customer Satisfaction Survey: Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines

OMB: 1090-0011

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

OMB Control No. 1090-0011

Expiration Date: June 30, 2015


Top of Form

Customer Satisfaction Survey

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines


We would like your thoughts and opinions about the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines (Guidelines). When you are finished making entries, hit the "Done" button at the bottom of the questionnaire.


You can view the Guidelines at:    http://www.fws.gov/windenergy

If you have any questions, contact Christy Johnson-Hughes at [email protected] or 703-358-1922.

Thank you for your participation.



Shape1

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT: We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Your response is voluntary. We estimate that it will take you about 10 minutes to complete the survey. You may send comments on the estimated burden or any other aspect of this information collection to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Mailstop 2042-PDM, Arlington, VA 22203.



SURVEY QUESTIONS


1. In the past year, did you use the Guidelines in the planning, construction, and/or operational phases of a wind energy facility?


  Shape2 Yes

  Shape3 No



2. Which tiers of the Guidelines did you use? (check all that apply)
 
  Shape4 I have never actually used the tiers (skip to Question 7)                 
     Shape5 Tier 1

     Shape6 Tier 2
    
Shape7 Tier 3
    
Shape8 Tier 4
    
Shape9 Tier 5

3. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service previously estimated that for utility-scale wind energy projects, the average time necessary to provide information for each tier is as follows:


Tier 1 – 83 hours

Tier 2 – 375 hours

Tier 3 – 2,880 hours

Tier 4 – 2,550 hours

Tier 5 – 2,400 hours


In your experience using the Guidelines, how do these estimates compare with your actual efforts? (Note that these estimates do not include time spent on any activities required to comply with Federal laws and regulations such as the Bald and Golden Eagle Act or the Endangered Species Act, rather, only those activities that do not lead to a permit and are carried out voluntarily.)

Shape10



4. How did the Communications Protocol on page 5 of the Guidelines influence your interactions with USFWS?


Shape11




5. Did the USFWS provide any technical assistance to you on your wind energy project?


  Shape12 Yes

  Shape13 No


6. If you answered yes to the question above, please describe any decisions that were influenced by the technical assistance provided by the USFWS.  


Shape14


7. What portions of the Guidelines do you find especially useful?
  (check all that apply)
  
Shape15 Executive Summary

  Shape16 Chapter 1: General Overview

     Shape17 Chapter 2: Tier 1 – Preliminary Site Evaluation
    
Shape18 Chapter 3: Tier 2 – Site Characterization
    
Shape19 Chapter 4: Tier 3 – Field Studies to Document Site Wildlife and Habitat and Predict Project Impacts

     Shape20 Chapter 5: Tier 4 – Post-construction Studies to Estimate Impacts
    
Shape21 Chapter 6: Tier 5 – Other Post-construction Studies
    
Shape22 Chapter 7: Best Management Practices

     Shape23 Chapter 8: Mitigation

     Shape24 Chapter 9: Advancing Use, Cooperation, and Effective Implementation

     Shape25 Appendix A: Glossary

     Shape26 Appendix B: Literature Cited

     Shape27 Appendix C: Sources of Information Pertaining to Methods to Assess Impacts to Wildlife




8. How satisfied are you with the Guidelines?

    CONTENT – do the Guidelines include the types of information you want?  
    
         Shape28 Very satisfied     Shape29 Satisfied     Shape30 Dissatisfied     Shape31 Very dissatisfied     Shape32 No opinion

    LEVEL of DETAIL – do the Guidelines include the right amount of information?  
    
         Shape33 Very satisfied     Shape34 Satisfied     Shape35 Dissatisfied     Shape36 Very dissatisfied     Shape37 No opinion

    ILLUSTRATIONS - do the pictures and figures add value to the Guidelines?  
    
         Shape38 Very satisfied     Shape39 Satisfied     Shape40 Dissatisfied     Shape41 Very dissatisfied     Shape42 No opinion

    USABILITY – are the Guidelines easy to read and understand?  
    
         Shape43 Very satisfied     Shape44 Satisfied     Shape45 Dissatisfied     Shape46 Very dissatisfied     Shape47 No opinion

    ORGANIZATION - is it easy to find the information you seek?  
    
         Shape48 Very satisfied     Shape49 Satisfied     Shape50 Dissatisfied     Shape51 Very dissatisfied     Shape52 No opinion

    USEFULNESS – do the Guidelines meet your needs?  
    
         Shape53 Very satisfied     Shape54 Satisfied     Shape55 Dissatisfied     Shape56 Very dissatisfied     Shape57 No opinion

    OVERALL SATISFACTION  
    
         Shape58 Very satisfied     Shape59 Satisfied     Shape60 Dissatisfied     Shape61 Very dissatisfied     Shape62 No opinion


9. Please provide comments or suggestions on how we can improve the Guidelines.

Shape63








File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorRachel London
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy