Form 1 BTCG Survey

OMB Control #: 0925-0668

Expiration Date: 1/31/2016

Burden Disclosure: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: NIH, Project Clearance Branch, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7974, Bethesda, MD 20892-7974, ATTN: PRA# 0925-0668. Do not return the completed form to this address.

Overall Evaluation Form

SECTION I (Please circle your answer.) (4=Strongly Agree 3=Agree 2=Disagree 1=Strongly Disagree)

1. Attending this Workshop increased my knowledge/understanding of NIH/NIAID

mission, career options, peer review process 4 3 2 1

2. The Workshop offered information that was relevant to my research career 4 3 2 1

3. I received new information that was not available to me prior to the Workshop 4 3 2 1

4. The Workshop materials were valuable 4 3 2 1

5. The number of breakout sessions was appropriate 4 3 2 1

6. The topics addressed during the Workshop were appropriate 4 3 2 1

7. I would recommend this Workshop to my colleagues 4 3 2 1

S ECTION II (Please circle your answer) (4=Excellent 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor)

8. How relevant was each of the following Workshop presentations to increasing your

knowledge base in future research and career options

a. NIH/NIAID Scientific Mission 4 3 2 1

b. Keys to Success 4 3 2 1

c. Experiences from the Front Line – Post Doc Panel 4 3 2 1

d. Funding Sources 4 3 2 1

e. Mentoring Presentation 4 3 2 1

f. Overview of Career Choices 4 3 2 1

g. Speaker Event with NIAID 4 3 2 1

h. NIH Grant System & Peer Review 4 3 2 1

i. Mock Study Section 4 3 2 1

j. Strategies for Success: Perspectives from Grantees and Reviewers 4 3 2 1

k. Role of Program Staff 4 3 2 1

l. Budget proposal pre-Post Award 4 3 2 1

m. Breakout Groups 4 3 2 1

(Please indicate which breakout group you were in) _____________________________________________

9. Please rate the Workshop arrangements and facilities. (4=Excellent 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor)

(Please circle "NA " if you did not use the service.)

a. Convenience of site/date/time (NA) 4 3 2 1

b. On-site registration process (NA) 4 3 2 1

c. Meeting facility (NA) 4 3 2

e. Hotel accommodations (i.e., lodging room) (NA) 4 3 2 1

10. Overall, the Workshop was (4=Excellent 3=Good 2=Fair 1=Poor) 4 3 2 1

S ECTION III

11. What were the strengths of this Workshop?

1 2. What suggestions do you have for improving this Workshop?

1 3. Which portion (s) of the workshop did you find most beneficial to your individual needs?

1 4. Additional Comments:

Name (optional):

( Please Print)

Check all boxes that apply:

□ Predoctorate □ Postdoctorate

• Diversity Supplement □ nF32 grantee

• PSA (Kll) grantee
  
  

Division of Intramural Research

□ IRTA □ Clinical Associate

□ Staff Fellow □ Visiting Fellow

□ Other (specify)___________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your participation!