Survey Invitation | ||||||
This is the standard survey invitation. Default text is included. If you would like to modify this text please check with your analyst/client manager. | ||||||
Welcome and Thank You Text | ||||||
The text you see here will appear at the top and bottom of your survey. Default text is included and you may modify this text as needed. | ||||||
Model Questions | ||||||
As discussed during the kick-off call, the model questions are part of the ForeSee methodology. For consistency within the model, these questions are standardized and have been tested and validated. Standardization of model questions allows benchmarking across companies/industries, and these questions are used in calculating scores and impacts. | ||||||
Focus on the future behaviors; I’ve started with some that I believe are a good fit but we can certainly make adjustments. These are desired customer outcomes that are impacted by customer satisfaction. | ||||||
Custom Questions | ||||||
When reviewing the custom questions tab, keep in mind these questions are used for segmentation analysis of the model data. It is suggested that you add, delete or change custom questions over time, as your needs or business objectives change. | ||||||
Focus Area #1: Achieving Actionable Data - Know what changes are being made based on the intelligence - Change Custom Questions so that stakeholders see a clear “must do” |
||||||
Focus Area #2: Aligning Data to Business Strategies - Update your Custom Questions as business cycles change - Integrate Executive Level questions to evaluate initiatives |
||||||
Focus Area #3: Strategic and Tactical Value - Influence Board Room Decisions - Change Operational Approaches - Mature Your Research |
||||||
Making Changes | ||||||
Simply make the change that you desire and highlight that change with a different color text. Red works well because it stands out. If the change is "complicated" a brief explanation about what you would like to accomplish will help us understand your request and figure out the best way to implement. -Or- Just give us a call; talking through changes over the phone makes it quick and easy. |
The text you see here will appear at the top and bottom of your survey, examples below. | ||||
Default text is included and you may modify this text as needed. | ||||
Welcome and Thank You Text | ||||
Welcome Text | ||||
Thank you for choosing the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) form for your scheduling needs. We hope your experience was positive. At this time, we would like to hear any feedback you may have regarding the interview scheduled through the USPTO AIR form. Your responses will help us improve both Applicant's and Examiner's interview experiences. The survey will take about 3 to 5 minutes. Your responses to this survey are anonymous and results will be viewed and reported in aggregate format only. |
||||
Thank You Text | ||||
Thank you for taking our survey - and for helping us serve you better. | ||||
Example Desktop | ||||
Model Name | USPTO Applicant Survey | |||||||
Model ID | Underlined & Italicized: Re-order | |||||||
Partitioned | No | Pink: Addition | ||||||
Date | 4/19/2017 | Blue: Reword | ||||||
Label | Element Questions | Label | Satisfaction Questions | Label | Future Behaviors | |||
Accessibility | Satisfaction | Contact via Channel Again (1=Very Unlikely, 10=Very Likely) |
||||||
Accessibility - Convenience | Thinking about scheduling with USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR), please rate the following: The convenience of scheduling with AIR as compared to other methods (1=Not Convenient at all, 10=Very Convenient, Don't Know) |
Satisfaction - Overall | What was your overall satisfaction with this interview experience? (1=Very Dissatisfied, 10=Very Satisfied) |
Contact Via Channel Again | How likely are you to schedule interviews using USPTO AIR in the future? | |||
Accessibility - Wait Time | How long I had to wait to confirm the interview with an examiner (1=Unexpected Wait Time, 10=Expected Wait Time at all, Don't Know) |
Satisfaction - Expectations | How well did your interview experience meet your expectations? (1=Fell Short, 10=Exceeded) |
|||||
Examiner (1=Poor, 10=Excellent, Don't Know) |
Satisfaction - Ideal | How well did your experience compare to an ideal interview experience? (1=Not Very Close, 10=Very Close) |
Communicate Experience (1=Very Unlikely, 10=Very Likely) |
|||||
Please rate the examiner who conducted the interview in the following areas: |
Communicate Experience | How likely are you to communicate with others about your USPTO AIR Interview experience? | ||||||
Examiner - Knowledge | Level of knowledge regarding the inventive concept and prior art | |||||||
Responses (1=Poor, 10=Excellent, Don't Know) |
||||||||
Responses - Thoroughness | Please rate the responses provided to your requests or questions in the following areas: Thoroughness of explanations regarding examiner's position during the interview (1=Insufficient , 10=Very Thorough, Don't Know) |
|||||||
Responses- Resolved | The extent to which my issues or requests were resolved (1=Not Resolved at all, 10=Completely Resolved, Don't Know) |
Model Name | USPTO Applicant Survey | (Interviewee) | ||||||
Model ID | Underlined & Italicized: Re-order | |||||||
Partitioned | No | Pink: Addition | ||||||
Date | 4/19/2017 | Blue: Reword | ||||||
QID | Skip From | Question Text | Answer Choices | Skip To | Required Y/N |
Type | Special Instructions | CQ Label |
What was/were your reason(s) for requesting this interview? | Clarify reasons for rejection(s) | Y | Checkbox, one-up vertical | Skip Logic Group* | Primary Reason | |||
Present proposed claim amendments | ||||||||
Discuss claims of prior art | ||||||||
Provide a demonstration | ||||||||
Other, please specify: | A | |||||||
A | Please specify the other reason for your interview. | N | Text field, <100 char | Skip Logic Group* | Primary Reason - Other | |||
Was the examiner of record prepared at the scheduled time and date? | Yes | Y | Radio button, one-up vertical | Examiner - Prepared | ||||
No | ||||||||
Besides the examiner on record, was a Supervisory Patent Examiner (SPE) or another examiner present at the interview? | Yes | A | Y | Radio button, one-up vertical | Skip Logic Group* | SPE - Present | ||
No | ||||||||
Don't know | ||||||||
A | Was the SPE or other examiner present in the interview prepared at the scheduled time and date? | Yes | Y | Radio button, one-up vertical | SPE - Prepared | |||
No | ||||||||
Don't know | ||||||||
Did you reach resolution on pending issues during this interview? | Yes | Radio button, one-up vertical | Resolution | |||||
No | Y | |||||||
Did this interview improve your understanding of the examiner's positions regarding this application? | Yes | Y | Radio button, one-up vertical | Improve Understanding | ||||
No | ||||||||
Did the examiner discuss possible ways to overcome the rejections of record? | Yes | Y | Radio button, one-up vertical | Objections - Overcoming | ||||
No | ||||||||
Did the interview provide adequate time to address all issues? | Yes | Y | Radio button, one-up vertical | Adequate time | ||||
No | ||||||||
Were the examiner's positions presented with decorum, courtesy, and professionalism? | Yes | Y | Radio button, one-up vertical | Skip Logic Group* | Examiner - Professionalism | |||
No | A | |||||||
A | Please explain: | N | Text area, no char limit | Skip Logic Group* | Professionalism - Problems OE | |||
Please provide any additional comments that might help us improve your experience: | N | Text area, no char limit | Additional Improvements |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |