30-Day Notice

1018-0100 30-day notice published.pdf

Migratory Birds and Wetlands Conservation Grant Programs

30-Day Notice

OMB: 1018-0100

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
4301

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices
maintenance costs). The comments that
are submitted will be summarized and
included in the CBP request for OMB
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record. In this
document, CBP is soliciting comments
concerning the following information
collection:
Title: Lien Notice.
OMB Number: 1651–0012.
Form Number: 3485.
Abstract: Section 564, Tariff Act of 19,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1564) provides
that the claimant of a lien for freight can
notify CBP in writing of the existence of
a lien, and CBP shall not permit
delivery of the merchandise from a
public store or a bonded warehouse
until the lien is satisfied or discharged.
The claimant shall file the notification
of a lien on CBP Form 3485, Lien
Notice. This form is usually prepared
and submitted to CBP by carriers,
cartmen and similar persons or firms.
The data collected on this form is used
by CBP to ensure that liens have been
satisfied or discharged before delivery of
the freight from public stores or bonded

Dated: January 21, 2015.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2015–01476 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Revocation of Customs
Broker’s License
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Customs broker’s license
revocation.
AGENCY:

This document provides
notice of the revocation of a customs
broker’s license.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document provides notice that,
pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (codified at 19 U.S.
Code 1641), and section 111.30(d) of
title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (19 CFR 111.30(d)), the
following customs broker’s license is
revoked by operation of law without
prejudice for failure to file a triennial
status report.
SUMMARY:

Company name

License No.

Port of issuance

Brian D. Stacy ..............................................................................................................................................

21354

Seattle

Dated: January 22, 2015.
Brenda Smith,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2015–01439 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–HQ–MB–2015–N019;
FXMB37660900000–14X–FF09M12000]

Information Collection Request Sent to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; Migratory Birds
and Wetlands Conservation Grant
Programs
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:

We (U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. We summarize the

SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

warehouses, and to ensure that proceeds
from public auction sales are distributed
to the lienholder. CBP Form 3485 is
provided for by 19 CFR 141.112, and is
accessible at http://forms.cbp.gov/pdf/
CBP_Form_3485.pdf.
Current Actions: This submission is
being made to extend the expiration
date with no change to the burden
hours. There are no changes to the
information collected or to Form 3485.
Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Businesses.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
112,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 15
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 28,000.

ICR below and describe the nature of the
collection and the estimated burden and
cost. This information collection is
scheduled to expire on January 31,
2015. We may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. However, under OMB
regulations, we may continue to
conduct or sponsor this information
collection while it is pending at OMB.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before February 26, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and
suggestions on this information
collection to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior at OMB–
OIRA at (202) 395–5806 (fax) or OIRA_
[email protected] (email).
Please provide a copy of your comments
to the Information Collection Clearance
Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
MS BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041–3803 (mail), or
[email protected] (email). Please
include ‘‘1018–0100’’ in the subject line
of your comments.
Number of
respondents

Activity

NAWCA Small Grants—Applications ...............................................................

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:01 Jan 26, 2015

Jkt 235001

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Hope Grey at hope_
[email protected] (email) or 703–358–2482
(telephone). You may review the ICR
online at http://www.reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to review Department of
the Interior collections under review by
OMB.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Information Collection Request
OMB Control Number: 1018–0100.
Title: Migratory Birds and Wetlands
Conservation Grant Programs.
Service Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Description of Respondents: Domestic
and foreign individuals, businesses, and
other for-profit organizations;
educational organizations; not-for-profit
institutions; and Federal, State, tribal
and local governments
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Number of
responses

71

E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM

71

27JAN1

Completion
time per
response
(hours)
40

Total annual
burden hours
2,840

4302

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices

Number of
respondents

Activity

Completion
time per
response
(hours)

Total annual
burden hours

NAWCA Small Grants—Reports .....................................................................
NAWCA U.S. Standard Grants—Applications .................................................
NAWCA Canadian and Mexican Standard Grants—Applications ...................
NAWCA Standard Grants—Reports ................................................................
NMBCA Grant Applications .............................................................................
NMBCA Reports ..............................................................................................

99
69
27
177
84
71

99
69
27
177
84
71

33
203
80
30
60
40

3,267
14,007
2,160
5,310
5,040
2,840

Totals ........................................................................................................

598

598

........................

35,464

Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden
Cost: None.
Abstract: The Division of Bird Habitat
Conservation administers grant
programs associated with the North
American Wetlands Conservation Act
(NAWCA), Public Law 101–233, and the
Neotropical Migratory Bird
Conservation Act (NMBCA), Public Law
106–247.

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Number of
responses

North American Wetlands
Conservation Act Grants
NAWCA provides matching grants to
organizations and individuals who have
developed partnerships to carry out
wetlands conservation projects in the
United States, Canada, and Mexico for
the benefit of wetlands-associated
migratory birds and other wildlife.
There is a Standard and a Small Grants
Program. Both are competitive grants
programs and require that grant requests
be matched by partner contributions at
no less than a 1-to-1 ratio. Funds from
U.S. Federal sources may contribute to
a project, but are not eligible as a match.
The Standard Grants Program
supports projects in Canada, the United
States, and Mexico that involve longterm protection, restoration, and
enhancement of wetlands and
associated uplands habitats. In Mexico,
partners may also conduct projects
involving technical training,
environmental education and outreach,
organizational infrastructure
development, and sustainable-use
studies.
The Small Grants Program operates
only in the United States. It supports the
same types of projects and adheres to
the same selection criteria and
administrative guidelines as the U.S.
Standard Grants Program. However,
project activities are usually smaller in
scope and involve fewer project dollars.
Grant requests may not exceed $75,000,
and funding priority is given to grantees
or partners new to the NAWCA Grants
Program.
We publish notices of funding
availability on Grants.gov (http://
www.grants.gov), as well as in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:01 Jan 26, 2015

Jkt 235001

(https://www.cfda.gov). To compete for
grant funds, partnerships submit
applications that describe in substantial
detail project locations, project
resources, future benefits, and other
characteristics that meet the standards
established by the North American
Wetlands Conservation Council and the
requirements of NAWCA. Materials that
describe the program and assist
applicants in formulating project
proposals are available on our Web site
at http://www.fws.gov/birdhabitat/
Grants/NAWCA. Persons who do not
have access to the Internet may obtain
instructional materials by mail. We have
not made any major changes in the
scope and general nature of the
instructions since OMB first approved
the information collection in 1999.
Neotropical Migratory Bird
Conservation Act
NMBCA establishes a matching grant
program to fund projects that promote
the long-term conservation of
neotropical migratory birds and their
habitats in the United States, Canada,
Latin America, and the Caribbean.
Principal conservation actions
supported are:
• Protection and management of
populations.
• Maintenance, management,
protection, and restoration of habitat.
• Research and monitoring.
• Law enforcement.
• Community outreach and
education.
We publish notices of funding
availability on Grants.gov as well as in
the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance. To compete for grant funds,
partnerships submit applications that
describe in substantial detail project
locations, project resources, future
benefits, and other characteristics that
meet the standards established by the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
requirements of NMBCA.
Materials that describe the program
and assist applicants in formulating
project proposals for consideration are
available on our Web site at http://
www.fws.gov/birdhabitat/Grants/

PO 00000

Frm 00060

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

NMBCA. Persons who do not have
access to the Internet may obtain
instructional materials by mail. We have
not made any major changes in the
scope and general nature of the
instructions since OMB first approved
the information collection in 2002.
Comments Received and Our Responses
Comments: On October 22, 2014, we
published in the Federal Register (79
FR 63159) a notice of our intent to
request that OMB renew approval for
this information collection. In that
notice, we solicited comments for 60
days, ending on December 22, 2014. We
received one comment. The commenter
objected to the grant programs, but did
not address the information collection
requirements. We have not made any
changes to the information collection.
Request for Public Comments
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.

E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM

27JAN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices
Dated: January 21, 2015.
Tina A. Campbell,
Chief, Division of Policy and Directives
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

a notice of intent in the Federal Register
(75 FR 17763) on April 7, 2010. For
more about the initial process and the
history of this refuge, see that notice.

[FR Doc. 2015–01341 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am]

Background

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–R–2012–N207;
FXRS1265070000S3–134–FF07R06000]

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska;
Revised Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Final Environmental Impact
Statement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:

We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a revised comprehensive
conservation plan (plan/CCP) and final
environmental impact statement (EIS)
for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(refuge, NWR) for a 30-day public
review. In this revised plan and final
EIS, we describe how we propose to
manage the refuge for the next 15 years.
DATES: The review period will end
February 26, 2015. We are not soliciting
comments on the plan during this
review period.
ADDRESSES: You may submit questions
or requests for more information by any
one of the following methods:
• Email: [email protected].
Include ‘‘Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge Revised CCP and Final EIS’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• Fax: Attention: Arctic CCP,
Planning Team Leader, Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge, (907) 456–0428.
• U.S. Mail: Attention: Stephanie
Brady, Arctic CCP, Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge, 101 12th Ave., Rm.
236, Fairbanks, AK 99701.
• In-Person Drop Off: You may drop
off questions during regular business
hours at the above addresses.
You will find the plan and EIS, as
well as information about the planning
process and a summary of the revised
plan, on the planning Web site: http://
arctic.fws.gov/ccp.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Brady, (907) 306–7448.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

Introduction
With this notice, we continue the
comprehensive conservation planning
process for Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge, which we began by publishing

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:01 Jan 26, 2015

Jkt 235001

The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act (ANILCA) requires us
to develop a CCP for each national
wildlife refuge in Alaska. The purpose
of developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a strategy for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing
toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS),
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction for conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. In general, we review
and update CCPs in Alaska every 15 to
20 years.
ANILCA lists specific purposes for
each refuge in Alaska. These purposes
provide the foundation for developing
and prioritizing the management goals
and objectives for each Alaskan refuge.
The planning process is a way for us
and the public to evaluate management
goals and objectives that will ensure the
best possible approach to wildlife,
plant, and habitat conservation while
providing for wildlife-dependent
recreation opportunities that are
compatible with each refuge’s
establishing purposes and the mission
of the NWRS.
Additional Information
The revised plan may be found at
http://arctic.fws.gov/ccp.htm. The
document incorporates an EIS, prepared
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (43
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Alternatives Considered
The revised plan and final EIS
includes detailed information about the
refuge, planning process, issues, and
management alternatives considered.
The final EIS includes discussions of six
alternatives for refuge management. All
six alternatives address three significant
issues: Wilderness recommendations,
Wild and Scenic River
recommendations, and Kongakut River
visitor use management. The Service’s
preferred alternative is described in the
revised Plan and final EIS.

PO 00000

Frm 00061

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

4303

Alternative A: Current Management
(No Action)
This alternative reflects the current
management direction of Arctic NWR. It
provides the baseline against which to
compare other alternatives. Under
Alternative A, the refuge would
continue to be managed according to the
direction included in the 1988 plan.
Current goals and objectives would not
be changed.
• Wilderness—No new areas would
be recommended for Wilderness
designation.
• Wild and Scenic Rivers—No new
rivers would be recommended for
inclusion in the Wild and Scenic Rivers
System.
• Kongakut River Visitor Use
Management—Managers would
continue to manage visitors using the
following practices: Group size limits
for guided groups (7 hikers, 10 floaters);
and No group size limits for non-guided
groups, although we recommend using
commercial limits; Information on lowimpact camping and other best practices
would continue to be available on the
Refuge Web site. Commercial service
providers would continue to have
special use permits with occasional
compliance checks by the Service.
Monitoring of physical and social
conditions and visitor impacts would
continue to occur occasionally. Air
operator permit holders would be
required to land on non-vegetated
surfaces and asked to follow all Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA)
advisories during flight operations. The
Service would prepare a Public Use
Management Plan (as required by the
1988 plan).
Alternative B
• Wilderness—Recommend the
Brooks Range Wilderness Study Area to
Congress for Wilderness designation.
• Wild and Scenic Rivers—
Recommend the Hulahula, Kongakut,
and Marsh Fork Canning Rivers to
Congress for inclusion into the National
Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
• Kongakut River Visitor Use
Management—Under this alternative,
and immediately upon plan approval,
we would proceed with two concurrent
step-down plans: A Visitor Use
Management Plan (VUMP) and a
Wilderness Stewardship Plan (WSP). In
addition to the practices identified
under Alternative A, we would
implement interim measures. The refuge
would expand monitoring of degraded
sites, work with guides to reduce visitor
volume, work with air operators to
disperse flights over high-use areas,
publish a schedule of when guides will

E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM

27JAN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2015-01-27
File Created2015-01-27

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy