OMB Control No 1090-0011
Expiration Date: August 31, 2018
Department of the Interior
Pre-Award & Debriefing Satisfaction Survey
Your firm submitted an offer for Solicitation No. from procurement office .
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: We estimate the survey will take you 10 minutes to complete, including time to read instructions, gather information, and complete and submit the survey. Your answers will help us assess our performance and identify our strengths and weaknesses. Your response is voluntary and results will be anonymous. The results from the survey will not be published or made publicly available. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control number.
Please submit your response within the next thirty days.
Please rate your level of satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being “Very Satisfied” and 1 being “Very Dissatisfied”
|
Very Satisfied |
|
|
|
|
Very Dissatisfied |
|
Requirements Development Process - How satisfied were you: |
|||||||
1. With the agency’s vendor engagement methods (e.g., RFIs, draft RFP, pre-award conferences) in fostering early communication and exchange before receipt of proposals? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
2. That the exchange offered by any industry day(s) offered valuable information that improved your understanding of the agency’s requirements? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
3. With the agency’s understanding of your firm’s marketplace? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
4. With the clarity of the final requirements? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
Solicitation Phase - How satisfied were you: |
|||||||
5. That the agency kept vendors informed about any delays in the solicitation process (considering both the initial release and any subsequent delays)? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
6. That the solicitation included clear proposal submission instructions that sufficiently guided offerors or respondents in preparing proposals or responses to requests for information? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
7. That the government chose an appropriate contract type? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
8. That the government chose an appropriate source selection methodology? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
N/A |
9. That the agency answered questions regarding the solicitation in such a way that it helped you to prepare the proposal? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
10. With the opportunity to propose unique and innovative solutions (i.e., the solicitation promoted innovation)? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
11. With the clarity of the solicitation’s evaluation criteria? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
12. With the amount of time the agency gave to submit a proposal? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
13. That the solicitation’s evaluation criteria allowed for the best selection among competing proposals? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
Award Execution and Debriefings- How satisfied were you: |
||||||
14. With the agency’s resolution of issues/concerns related to the contracting process? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
15. With the robustness of the agency’s debriefing (i.e., it allowed you to understand how to improve on similar efforts in the future)? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
16. How satisfied were you with your overall experience on this acquisition? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
17. Please provide any additional comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Are you a small business? |
|
Yes |
|
|
No |
|
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | WPierantoni |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-25 |