Download:
pdf |
pdfCore Development Work
Parole Agency Head Discussion Guide
Thank you for taking time to review the survey materials and speak with me today. During our call,
I would like to hear your thoughts about the content and focus of the survey – especially as they
relate to the definitions and instructions used in the survey. The APS has been standardized because
it is a national survey collection; so some of the content and terminology might not match your
agency’s definitions and practices. It is really helpful to hear about how agencies define and track
their own populations and the extent to which they match those used on the survey.
There are a few specific sections of the survey that I would like to discuss with you. We can go
through the questionnaire page by page, and I’ll raise the issues that I have. If you would like to talk
about any issues that I don’t raise, please let me know.
The first question that I have on my list is Question 2. Should we begin with that question
or is there anything on the cover page or on the first question that you would like to talk
about?
Q2. …entered parole by –
b. Mandatory release from prison
d. Term of supervised release from prison
Does your agency use these terms? How are the two groups different?
Q3. …discharged from supervision for the following reasons –
a. Completions
Would your agency be able to sub‐divide the number of completions into the two categories
of early terminations (early positive discharge) and expirations? How would your agency
define early terminations and expirations?
o CAPSA definition of “Early terminations” or “early positive discharge”‐ A discharge prior
to the scheduled expiration of a sentence granted in response to the satisfaction of
conditions or earned time credits.
o Definition of “Expirations”‐ A discharge according to the scheduled expiration of a
sentence granted in response to the satisfaction of conditions of supervision (possibly
with some financial conditions remaining).
f. Other [consider eliminating from survey]
What other types of discharges does your agency track? What would you include in each of
the three categories: other completions, unsatisfactory, and other?
Next, let’s look at Question 4.
Q4. On December 31st, what was your agency’s adult parole population?
What types of populations would be included in your agency’s yearend count?
Would you include juveniles sentenced in an adult court?
Could your agency break‐out the yearend count by the following categories?
o Active vs. inactive (Does “active” include absconders, low‐risk, those in residential
placements that are/are not still under their jurisdiction?)
o Custody vs. jurisdiction counts
o Felon vs. misdemeanant populations
If your agency was able to provide data for the yearend count on the number of
POPULATION TYPE, would you be able to provide the data for the rest of the survey for just
these POPULATION TYPE parolees?
Before we move on to the next page, are there any other issues that you would like to talk
about on Question 1 through 4?
Q5. …count of individuals or cases?
How does your agency define “cases”? Does it include instances where the person was
under supervision for two or more distinct sentences? Under supervision for two or more
offenses as part of the same sentence? Something else?
Your agency provides data at the case level? Can you explain why you report cases and not
individuals? Could your agency provide data at the individual level?
Could your agency provide an estimate of the number of people with multiple cases? Could
your agency provide an estimate of the average number of cases per individual?
Unless you have comments on Questions 6 and 7, I’ll move on to Question 8.
Q8. …maximum sentence of –
How useful are the categories – a year or less and more than a year – in describing your
parolee population? What other categories might be more informative? Why?
If you’re ready, I’d like to look at Question 11 next.
Q11. …most serious offense –
Does your agency use a hierarchy to define which offenses are more serious than others? Can we
obtain a copy of the hierarchy?
Q12. …parolees supervised by your agency had a status of –
a. Active
c. Inactive
How does your agency define an “active” parolee? How does your agency define an
“inactive” parolee? What types of parolees are included or excluded?
Would your agency be able to provide data on the number of individuals in the yearend
count who are on “active” supervision status? Would your agency be able to provide data
on the number of individuals in the yearend count who are on “inactive” supervision status?
b. Only financial conditions remaining
Would these parolees be included in the yearend total?
Would these parolees be included in the number discharged by completion?
d. Absconders
Would absconders be included in the numbers reported as discharged for being an
absconder? If not, would they still be included in the yearend population?
g. Supervised out of jurisdiction
What types of parolees would your agency include in this category?
Would this category include interstate compact cases that are reported in Question 6?
Next, let’s look at Question 15.
Q15. …parolees who had their location tracked through a Global Positioning System (GPS)
Can you tell me more about how your agency uses GPS to track parolees?
What other types of electronic monitoring does your agency use? What types of parolees are
tracked in these ways?
For central reporters: Administrative records
Would your agency be able provide administrative records describing your parolee
population?
What information does your agency maintain in your administrative records?
What format is the information in?
What restrictions are there on information‐sharing (de‐identified data only)?
Agency Head comments: That was the last issue that I wanted to raise.
Is there anything else that you’ve noted in the questionnaire that might affect how your
agency would categorize or report on any population that you supervise?
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2015-03-17 |
File Created | 2015-03-17 |