Questions for RCO submitters and those receiving invitations to submit Phase 1 proposals
Question: To which track did you submit a Research Concept Outline (RCO)?
Response Options:
A1: OPEN KNOWLEDGE NETWORK
B1: AI AND FUTURE JOBS
B2: NATIONAL TALENT ECOSYSTEM
Question: At what type of institution is the PI in your RCO?
Response Options:
Educational institution
Business/Industry
Nonprofit organization (including private foundation)
State or local government (other than educational institution)
Federal government
Other (Specify):
Question: How did you hear about the C-Accel program?
Responses (Check all the apply):
Mailing list for NSF funding announcements
Presentations by NSF staff
Referred by NSF program officer
Referred by colleague
News media
Social media posts (e.g. Twitter)
In the next series of questions, we’d like to know more about the formation of the team you described in your RCO. This “team” includes all the collaborators and partners described in your RCO.
Question: Your RCO proposal contained team members from which institution types? Include the PI’s institution.
Response Options (check all that apply):
An educational institution
Business/Industry
A Nonprofit organization (including private foundation)
State or local government (other than educational institution)
Federal government
Question: Prior to the announcement of the DCL (March 15, 2019), was the team proposed in the DCL a team that already existed?
Response Options:
Yes
No
Question (if the team includes an educational institution): How many distinct academic departments, schools, or colleges (psychology, computer science, etc) are represented in your team?
Response Options:
One distinct department, school, or college
Two distinct departments, schools, or colleges
Three distinct departments, schools, or colleges
Four or more distinct departments, schools, or colleges
Question (Invitees only): During the preparation of your Phase 1 proposal, did you make any changes to the composition of your team in response to feedback you received from NSF?
Response Options:
Yes
No
Question (If Yes): What changes did you make?
Response Options (check all): that apply):
Added team members from additional institutions
Added team members from additional scientific fields
Added team members from different industry sectors
Redefined roles of current team members
Removed team members
The NSF C-Accel program has used webinars to help the community understand and prepare for the RCO and other phases of the pilot program. NSF also provided recordings and transcripts of the webinars as well as frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the C-Accel website.
Question: Did you attend any of the C-Accel webinars?
Response Options:
Yes
No
Question: Did you view recordings or read transcripts from the C-Accel webinars?
Response Options:
Yes
No
Question: Did you read the FAQs on the C-Accel website?
Response Options:
Yes
No
Question (if yes to webinar or transcript or read FAQs): What kind(s) of information were you seeking from the webinar?
Response Options (check all that apply):
Requirements for team composition
Requirements for tracks (A1, B1, B2)
The RCO submission process
Phase I proposal process
Other (Specify):
In the DCL, several sources were included to provide context and background for the C-Accel program and the tracks selected for the pilot (A1, B1, B2).
Question: Which of the following, if any, were most important to your preparation for an RCO submission?
Responses (check all that apply – order randomized):
NSF’s 10 Big Ideas
Harnessing the Data Revolution
Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier
FY 2020 Administration Research and Development Budget Priorities
Cross-Agency Priority (CAP) Goals and the President’s Management Agenda (PMA)
U.S. 5-Year STEM Education Strategic Plan
The Open Knowledge Network workshop report
Information Technology and the U.S. Workforce: Where Are We and Where Do We Go from Here (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine)
Addressing America’s Reskilling Challenge (White House Council of Economic Advisors)
The Quant Crunch: How the Demand for Data Science Skills is Disrupting the Job Market (The Business-Higher Education Forum)
Building America's Skilled Technical Workforce (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine)
Question: What was your most recent submission to an NSF program?
Responses:
The C-Accel RCO
Another NSF program (Research, Conferences, Equipment, Travel, Facility/Center, etc)
Question (if C-Accel RCO): Was the C-Accel RCO your first submission to an NSF program?
Responses:
Yes
No
Question (if Another NSF program or not your first submission): For your most recent submission to NSF was there a target or recommended date, a fixed deadline, or no deadline for submission?
Responses:
Target date, after which submissions were still reviewed
Fixed deadline, after which submissions were NOT reviewed
No deadline
The C-Accel RCO submission had a target date, after which RCO’s were still reviewed. Based on your RCO experience and previous NSF experience…
Question: If NSF provided a formatted template for the RCO, would you use it?
Responses:
Yes
No
Question: Would you recommend a deadline that is:
Responses:
Target date, after which submissions are still reviewed
Fixed deadline, after which submissions are NOT reviewed
Other (Specify):
Question: How much time between the DCL announcement and the target date would you recommend?
Responses:
30 days
30-60 days
More than 60 days
Other (Specify):
(invitees only) The current Phase I submission had a fixed deadline date, after which Phase I proposals were NOT reviewed. Based on your Phase I submission experience and previous NSF experience…
Question: Would you recommend a proposal format that is a
Responses:
Separate RCO and Phase 1 proposal
Single combined proposal
Other (Specify):
Question: How much time between the RCO target date and the Phase 1 proposal date would you recommend?
Responses:
30 days
30-60 days
More than 60 days
Other (Specify):
Question: Are you inclined to submit an RCO to future topic areas in the C-Accel program?
Responses:
Yes
No
Question: If there were anything you could change about the submission process to improve the experience, or in your view improve the quality of proposals submitted, what would it be?
Response: Open Text (1/4 to 1/2 page)
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Williams, Matthew R |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-15 |