3170-XXXX Debt Collection Quantitative Disclosure Testing SS Part A -final

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION
INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST

SUPPORTING STATEMENT PART A
DEBT COLLECTION QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURE TESTING
(OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 3170-XXXX)

OMB TERMS OF CLEARANCE: Not applicable. This is a new collection. There are no
terms of clearance at this time.

ABSTRACT:
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and other federal consumer
financial laws authorize the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) to engage
in consumer protection rule writing. This PRA clearance request seeks approval from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) to conduct a web survey of 8,000 individuals as part of the
Bureau’s research on debt collection disclosures.

The survey will explore consumer comprehension and decision making in response to debt
collection disclosure forms. The survey will oversample respondents who have had experience
with debt collection in the past.

JUSTIFICATION
1. Circumstances Necessitating the Data Collection

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub.L. 111–203) and other
federal consumer financial laws authorize the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or
Page 1 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

Bureau) to engage in consumer protection rule writing. The Bureau relies on empirical evidence
and rigorous research to improve its understanding of consumer financial markets for regulatory
purposes.
On November 12th, 2013, the CFPB issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking
concerning debt collection (78 FR 67847). This information collection request is to collect data
in support of CFPB rule-writing concerning debt collection. The main law that governs debt
collection and protects consumers is the 1977 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). 15
U.S.C. § 1692 In 2010, the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Pub.L. 111–203) revised the FDCPA, making the Bureau the first agency with the power to
issue substantive rules under the statute. The Bureau may also address concerns related to debt
collection using its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to issue regulations concerning unfair,
deceptive, or abusive acts or practices and to establish disclosures to assist consumers in
understanding the costs, benefits, and risks associated with consumer financial products and
services.

The FDCPA establishes the rights, liabilities, and responsibilities of participants in the debt
collection system, including third-party debt collectors, debt buyers, and consumers. Among
other things, the FDCPA was enacted to “eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt
collectors, [and] to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt
collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged.”

To achieve these purposes, the FDCPA: (1) prohibits debt collectors from engaging in abusive,
deceptive, or unfair practices; (2) imposes restrictions on debt collectors’ communications with
consumers and on their communications with others to locate consumers; and (3) mandates a
debt dispute process under which collectors provide consumers with basic information about
their alleged debts, consumers have the right to dispute their alleged debts, and collectors must
verify disputed debts before continuing to collect on them.

The FDCPA requires that debt collectors make certain disclosures as part of the collection
process. Most notably, Section 809 of the FDCPA requires debt collectors to provide “validation
Page 2 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

notices” (sometimes called “g-notices”) to consumers at the start of the collection process. These
notices contain information about the debt collection process, such as the consumer’s right to
dispute the debt, as well as information about the debt being collected, such as the name of the
debt’s owner and the amount owed.

Certain other disclosures are also required by the FDCPA. For instance, Section 807(11) requires
what is commonly called the “mini-Miranda” warning. In the collector’s initial communication,
it requires that collectors state that they are calling to collect a debt and that any information
obtained during the course of the call may be used to collect that debt. For all communications, it
also requires that debt collectors disclose that the communication is from a debt collector.

As part of a potential upcoming rulemaking implementing the FDCPA, the CFPB is considering
whether additional information should be added to the validation notice to help consumers
recognize whether they owe the debts. The CFPB also is considering whether additional
information about consumer rights under the FDCPA should be disclosed to consumers at the
time the validation notice is given. The CFPB further is considering whether consumers should
receive disclosures in validation notices or subsequent communications regarding time-barred
debts (i.e., debts that are older than the applicable state statute of limitations) or obsolete debts
(i.e., debts that fall outside the generally 7-year reporting window included in the Fair Credit
Reporting Act) or if other disclosures should be provided.

2. Use of the Information
The CFPB will use information gathered as part of this research study to help assess whether it
can improve the clarity of forms used during debt collection to facilitate consumer decision
making. Insights from this survey may provide information about how consumers respond to
disclosures that can be leveraged to inform the development of future consumer disclosures.

The CFPB plans to conduct a web-based survey that would test a number of outstanding
questions related to disclosures the Bureau is developing in conjunction with its debt collection
rulemaking, especially with regard to “time-barred” and “obsolete” debt. This survey will test
Page 3 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

outstanding issues regarding the disclosures on a large sample of consumers possessing a broad
range of demographic characteristics, oversampling consumers who indicate that they have
experience with debts in collection.

The CFPB has retained a contractor to conduct the proposed research; the contractor will
subcontract with a survey research firm to assist with administration of the web survey. The
study will be conducted in English and will use the subcontractor’s proprietary online panel. The
survey will not involve ongoing data collection; it is a one-time web survey. Participation will be
voluntary.

The CFPB plans to share aggregated findings from the survey with the public as appropriate, for
example, in a future study on debt collection or in connection with any potential rulemakings
related to debt collection.

3. Use of Information Technology
The survey will be a web-based data collection effort. Respondents will be recruited from GfK’s
KnowledgePanel, an online panel. Panelists will receive an email containing a personalized
URL (e.g., www.researchsurvey/123456) for the web survey that includes a unique, nonsequential identifier for secure login. Upon clicking on the URL that our contractor will host, the
respondent will be directed to the survey. They will be asked to read a validation notice and then
answer questions based on a hypothetical situation. The web instrument will automatically guide
the respondent through the survey questions. Respondents may save their responses and
suspend/resume the survey where they left off. At any time, respondents will be able to refer to
the validation notice.

Collecting data electronically will help to reduce errors and improve data reliability by:
•

Providing paradata, helping us understand how people interact with the survey (i.e. how
often they refer to the validation notice and for how long, and whether they return to
previous questions during the survey);

•

Providing uniform question sequencing;
Page 4 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

•

Automatically skipping questions, where appropriate, based on prior answers to
questions;

•

Randomizing disclosure forms to participants; and

•

Rejecting invalid responses or data entries.

Additionally, the subcontractor may collect data on the length of the survey and unit and item
non-response rates. This type of information can be used to improve the data collection process.

4. Efforts to Identify Duplication
The proposed consumer survey will not duplicate empirical research that the CFPB has identified
to date. The debt collection disclosure form alternatives that will be tested through the survey are
currently being developed, informed by previous qualitative research performed under OMB
Control # 3170-0055, Generic Information Collection Plan to Conduct Cognitive Research and
Pilot Testing under and information collection titled “Debt Collection Disclosure Testing
Quantitative Study, Pretesting of Survey Questions.” No empirical studies to date have
quantitatively tested consumers’ comprehension and decision making around these debt
collection disclosure form alternatives. Moreover, the quantitative testing will not be duplicative
of the qualitative form testing study. The qualitative study uses much smaller sample sizes to
identify any large trends in consumers’ reactions to specific aspects of the forms (e.g., the forms’
formatting and layout). The quantitative form testing study will test consumers’ comprehension
and decision making using updated versions of the forms with a much larger and representative
sample.

The CFPB will continue to monitor empirical research and related work by Federal Regulatory
agencies and other researchers to ensure that the CFPB’s research techniques reflect the most
current knowledge and best practices.

Page 5 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

5. Efforts to Minimize Burdens on Small Entities
Not applicable. The data collection will not burden small entities because the survey will only
collect information from individuals.

6. Consequences of Less Frequent Collection and Obstacles to Burden Reduction
Each surveyed individual will only participate once.

If the survey was not implemented, the CFPB would be limited in its ability to provide an
analysis of how the debt collection disclosure form alternatives facilitate consumers’
comprehension and decision making.

By implementing the survey, the CFPB will be able to test for differential patterns in form
comprehension and decision making across different types of disclosures. If the survey was not
implemented, the CFPB would not be able to assess these critical questions.

7. Circumstances Requiring Special Information Collection
There are no special circumstances. The collection of information is conducted in a manner
consistent with the guidelines in 5 C.F.R. 1320.5(d)(2).

8. Consultation Outside the Agency

In accordance with 5 C.F.R. 1320.8(d)(1), the Bureau published a Federal Register notice (FRN)
allowing the public 60 days to comment on this proposed new, collection of information.
Further, and in accordance with 5 C.F.R. 1320.5(a)(1)(iv), the Bureau has published a notice in
the Federal Register allowing the public 30 days to comment to OMB on the submission of this
information collection request. Further, as noted above the questions in this survey were pretested in pilot testing conducted under OMB Control #3170-0055.

Page 6 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

The CFPB received 9 responsive comments during the 60-day notice period. Commenters
included industry groups, consumer advocates, academics, and private citizens. Commenters
were generally supportive of research into debt collection disclosures.
We also thoughtfully considered the areas of improvement that the commenters proposed, and
we address those comments below.

Disclosure Notices
Several commenters expressed concern that the PRA submission materials did not include the
disclosure notices and text to which survey respondents will be asked to respond. After careful
consideration, the Bureau has concluded that the information contained in the Bureau’s proposed
Information Collection is sufficient to allow meaningful comment on the disclosure testing
research project, including the research methodology and survey instrument. The Bureau aims in
this research project to better understand consumer comprehension and decision making in
response to debt collection disclosure forms. The information collection for which the Bureau is
seeking OMB approval at this time is for the testing project itself, not the specific content of the
draft disclosure forms.

The Bureau believes that the specifics of particular test forms are not

needed to comment on the general research methodology and survey instrument.
The Bureau has previously released examples of possible consumer disclosures as part of the
Outline of Proposals Under Consideration for the Small Business Review Panel for Debt
Collector and Debt Buyer Rulemaking. The Bureau has received and continues to receive
feedback from stakeholders on these examples and related topics, and these disclosures continue
to be under consideration and development. Any disclosures that become part of a rulemaking
will be released at a later date and will be subject to public notice and comment.

Use of Hypothetical Scenario in Survey Questions
Commenters also expressed concern about the applicability of hypothetical questions to real
world decisions. In connection with this study, the Bureau has, among other things, performed

Page 7 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

qualitative testing of disclosure forms and pretesting of survey questions. The Bureau has also
explored different research methodology options with expert contractors and visiting scholars.
Most consumers have limited experience with debt collection, so asking about a hypothetical
scenario can help the Bureau learn about consumer decision-making around debt collection while
attracting a large enough respondent pool to test disclosures between groups with statistical
confidence. In addition, for this research study, the Bureau is striving for internal validity, not
external validity. In other words, the Bureau is interested in relative differences between groups
in disclosure comprehension, depending on the disclosure that each group receives; the Bureau
does not intend to rely on this research project to understand incidence rates in the population.
Given the research design the Bureau plans to employ, the hypothetical nature of the questions
should have similar effects (if any) on participants in all experimental groups, and therefore
would be a common factor across groups. Comparing relative responses across groups, as
opposed to measuring the incidence rate of comprehension for a particular group, should render
any effect of the hypothetical nature of the questions irrelevant for the Bureau’s purposes.
In fact, using “vignettes” (also called factorial or decision scenarios) to ask survey questions is a
common methodology in the social sciences. Evidence suggests that what people express on
web surveys is associated with their actual behavior in the real world, 12 and external validation
of the vignette method suggests responses are somewhat consistent among different demographic
groups. 3 For example, evidence suggests that how people respond in surveys using the vignette
method of questioning is related to how they behave in field studies, although there are biases,
including in the reporting of more prosocial behavioral norms compared to behavior in the real
world. 4 There may also be biases in survey responses based on automatic processes which affect

1

Couper, Mick, Singer, Eleanor, Conrad, Frederick, and Groves, Robert. 2010. “Experimental Studies of Disclosure
Risk, Disclosure Harm, Topic Sensitivity, and Survey Participation.” Journal of Official Statistics, 26(2): 287–300

2

Hensher, David A. 2009. “Hypothetical Bias, Choice Experiments and Willingness to Pay.” Transportation
Research Part B, 44: 735-752.

3

Teti, Andrea, Gross, Christiane, Knoll, Nina, and Bluher, Stefan. 2016. “Feasibility of the Factorial Survey Method
in Aging Research: Consistency Effects Among Older Respondents.” Research on Aging, 38(7): 715–741.

4

Eifler, Stefanie. 2010. “Validity of a Factorial Survey Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Behavior.” Methodology,
6(3):139–146

Page 8 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

consumer behavior but of which the consumer is not consciously aware. 5 However, these biases
are not limited to hypothetical questions, but rather are common in surveys in general.
The Bureau initially tested personalizing the vignette, asking respondents to imagine that this
debt is their own) but found that a depersonalized scenario was more effective due to the
sensitivity of debt collection. By depersonalizing the scenario (that is, by introducing Person A),
the Bureau may still encounter some bias due to the hypothetical nature of the questions.
Nevertheless, this technique also lowers the cognitive burden of response, allowing the
respondent to move toward an empathetic stance and provide feedback on what the respondent
thinks is the appropriate course of action for responding to the debt.
There are strategies to mitigate the impact of hypothetical bias that the CFPB employs in this
research study. One way is through increased study salience, or policy consequentiality, such
that “the participant cares about the results of the research, and believes that his or her answers
will influence decisions to be made as a result of the research”. 6 With increased salience comes
increased empathy and increased likelihood of reducing hypothetical bias. Indeed, the issue of
topic salience and response quality is one that is well documented in the survey methodological
literature. 7 Using best practices for increasing respondent salience for the study will combat
some hypothetical bias and respondent apathy. 8 Another way to minimize hypothetical bias is to
probe respondents for the certainty of their answers 9 by asking them how likely they think their

5

Verneau, Fabio, La Barbera, Francesco, and Del Guidice, Teresa. 2017. “The Role of Implicit Associations in the
Hypothetical Bias.” The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(2): 312-328.

6

Fifer, Simon, Rose, John, and Greaves, Stephen. 2014. “Hypothetical Bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is it a
Problem? And if so, How do We Deal With it?” Transportation Research Part A, 61: 164-177.

7

Calahan, C. A., & Schumm, W. R. 1995. “An Exploratory Analysis of Family Social Science Mail Survey Response
Rates.” Pshycological Reports, 76(3), 1379–1388.

8

Nicolaas, Smith, P., Pickering, K., & Branson, C. 2015. “Increasing Response Rates in Postal Surveys While
Controlling Costs: An Experimental Investigation.” Social Research Practice, (1), 3–16.

9

Blumenschein, Karen, Blomquist, Glenn C., Johannesson, Magnus, Horn, Nancy, and Freeman, Patricia. 2007.
“Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” The Economic Journal, 118(525):
114-137.

Page 9 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

response is what they would actually do. 10 The Bureau has embedded questions in the survey
that ask about the “likelihood” of various decisions as a proxy for confidence of response. The
Bureau can measure a respondent’s self-reported likelihood of taking certain actions in the “real
world”.

Other Survey Question Comments
Several commenters suggest that the Bureau track whether survey participants refer back to the
notices during the online survey. Other commenters suggested that the Bureau look at
differences in disclosure comprehension between subgroups. In addition, commenters urged the
Bureau to ensure that the survey has enough statistical power to see differences between groups,
and to perform robustness checks related to the study’s overweighting of people with debt
collection experience. The CFPB plans to do each of these things by collecting survey paradata
(which tracks respondents’ process flow throughout the survey) and individual difference
measures, which we plan to use in the analysis of this study. We will also receive demographic
information on respondents from Gfk as well.
In addition, several commenters expressed concern about changes to the survey that the Bureau
may make after the “soft launch” and before the “full launch.” The Bureau expects that any
changes identified during the soft launch will not have PRA implications. The Bureau has
already conducted cognitive interviews, to make sure the questions make sense to respondents.
During the pilot, the Bureau will review the results to make sure responses seem reasonable.
Because of the Bureau’s pretesting work, however, the Bureau believes that there is a small
probability of identifying concerns that would significantly change the questions of interest
during the pilot.
The Bureau considered other commenter suggestions about whether to add or omit certain
questions, but decided either that the Bureau found value in the current questions, or that the new
questions were outside the scope of this study. One commenter disagreed with the Bureau’s plan
to ask respondents about their subjective beliefs in the survey instrument. The Bureau believes
10

Hensher, David A. 2009. “Hypothetical Bias, Choice Experiments and Willingness to Pay.” Transportation
Research Part B, 44: 735-752.

Page 10 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

that these questions are important controls to better understand how respondents are interpreting
the disclosure forms. Another commenter suggested using financial literacy questions as
controls; however, given that other research has indicated that many people have trouble
answering traditional financial literacy questions, the Bureau decided to exclude such questions.
Nevertheless, the Bureau does plan to include in the survey a measure of financial well-being,
developed by the Bureau, to understand if responses vary as a function of this factor. While one
commenter did not think the Bureau asked enough questions to ascertain whether respondents
comprehend the disclosure, and another thought that the comprehension questions should be
open-ended, the Bureau believes that the current number and scope of comprehension questions
is sufficient to understand differences between forms. The Bureau also believes that its analysis
plan will provide the Bureau with the answers it seeks with regard to consumer comprehension.

9. Payments or Gifts to Respondents

Survey recipients will receive a cash payment, currently expected to be five dollars, as an
inducement to complete and return the survey questionnaire. Recipients who fail to respond to
the initial survey solicitation may receive an additional cash inducement of a similar amount.
Meta-analyses of mail surveys find that incentives given initially with the questionnaire yield
significantly higher response rates than do incentives contingent on return of the survey or no
incentives; furthermore, monetary incentives produce a stronger effect that non-monetary
incentives. 11,12 Many recurring federally-funded surveys use monetary incentives, including the
Survey of Consumer Finances, the Survey of Income and Program Participation, and the
National Survey of Drug Use and Health, and self-administered surveys such as the Survey of
Doctorate Recipients, the National Survey of Recent College Graduates, and the National Survey
of Mortgage Borrowers. 13 Incentives have consistently been found to improve response rates

11

Allan H. Church, “Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis,” Public
Opinion Quarterly 57, no. 1 (1993): 62-79.
12
Phil Edwards, Ian Roberts, Mike Clarke, Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Sarah Pratap, Reinhard Wentz, and Irene Kwan,
“Increasing Response Rates to Postal Questionnaires: Systematic Review,” British Medical Journal324
(2002):1183-1189.
13
Fan Zhang, “Incentive Experiments: NSF Experiences,” NSF Working Paper, 2010.

Page 11 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

across a variety of survey topics and modes. 14,15 Incentives have been found to be cost-effective
in different modes, often reducing the effort required to contact and interview sample persons or
reduce the number of follow-up mailings. 16,17,18
The Public will also have an opportunity to comment on the proposed disclosures when the
Bureau publishes its notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the rule that this research will support

10. Assurances of Confidentiality

The CFPB will not provide an explicit pledge of confidentially. The CFPB shall treat the
information in accordance with applicable federal law, and the Bureau’s own privacy rules, and
all applicable laws and regulations that apply to federal agencies for the protection of privacy,
security and integrity of information.

The CFPB provides notice to individuals to explain how their information will be used through
Privacy Act Statements. Privacy Act Statements are made available prior to the collection of
information and explain whether the information is mandatory or voluntary; the authority for the
information collection; whether there are any opportunities to consent to sharing and submission
of information; how the information will be secured, and what System of Records applies.

In the survey’s introduction, respondents will be informed about the study’s purpose, the
authority under which the data are being collected, that cooperation is voluntary, and that direct
identifying information will not be provided to the CFPB or to any other party.

14

Eleanor Singer (2002), “The Use of Incentives to Reduce Nonresponse in Household Surveys.” In R.M. Groves,
D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little (eds), Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley, pp. 163-177.
15
Eleanor Singer, and Cong Ye (2013), “The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys.” The Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science, 645 (1):112–141.
16
Martha Berlin et al. (1992), “An Experiment in Monetary Incentives.” Proceedings of the Survey Research
Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 393-398.
17
Eleanor Singer, John Van Hoewyk, and M. Patricia Maher (2000), “Experiments with Incentives in Telephone
Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (2): 171-188.
18
Gwen L. Alexander et al. (2008), “Effect of Incentives and Mailing Features on Recruitment for an Online Health
Program.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34 (5): 382-388.

Page 12 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

Regarding respondents’ personally identifiable information (“PII”), the subcontracted survey
research firm uses user- and role-based access by separating identifying and non-identifying data
into different database systems, each of which has its own defined security roles. Access to
survey data is limited to the relevant research staff but explicitly denied to anybody who may
deal with panelists’ PII. Only the subcontractor’s IT, Panel Management staff, and selected
vendors with a need to know have access to panelists’ PII. The CFPB will not have access to
panelists’ PII.

The contractor will deliver to the CFPB the data as received from the subcontracted survey
research firm, so that CFPB can analyze the data. The CFPB will only receive and keep response
data stripped of direct identifying PII. Moreover, in order to limit the amount of potentially
identifying information that the CFPB receives through demographic variables, the CFPB will
seek to receive demographic variables included in the data that shall be provided by the
contractor/subcontractor in ranges (e.g., age 18-34) rather than specific values (e.g., age 21)
where appropriate.

Conducting this survey implicates privacy concerns because a breach of confidentiality, or reidentification, could result in an individual suffering harm. To reduce the risk of breaches of
privacy, the CFPB designs recruitment materials so as not to disclose sensitive information about
those it seeks to recruit, and uses appropriate security controls to protect information used in
research. There is also risk related to misuse of information collected for research. Misuse might
involve secondary types of research that are incompatible with the purposes of the initial
collection, or a use of the information that individuals do not understand or to which they have
not provided consent.

To reduce the risk of misuse, the CFPB minimizes access to PII based on need-to-know; any
contractor staff assigned to the project also sign confidentiality agreements. Any responses
transmitted to the Bureau from this survey will be de-identified and / or aggregated before the
Bureau receives them. When appropriate, survey results will be presented in aggregated form to
protect the privacy of firms or consumers, and any publicly released version of data will use
disclosure protection techniques (e.g., rounding, imputation, exclusion of some variables,
Page 13 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

aggregation of categorical responses) to minimize the risk of releasing personally identifiable or
otherwise sensitive information (12 C.F.R. 1070.40 et seq.). The Bureau treats the information
collected from participating persons in a manner consistent with the Bureau’s privacy
regulations, and all data and analyses are subject to legal and privacy review prior to their
release. For the assurances of confidentiality provided to respondents by KnowledgePanel,
please see: http://www.knpanel.com/participate/privacy2.html.
The Bureau also evaluates the potential privacy risk and harm to individuals of specific research
relative to that authorized purpose, and vets research proposals to ensure that they serve an
authorized purpose. Surveys will be consistent with the Privacy Act and the E-Government Act.
The requisite SORNs and PIAs will document the collection, use, disclosure, and retention of
PII; and the technical, administrative, and physical controls used to minimize privacy risks. This
collection is covered by the CFPB.022 Market and Consumer Research Records, 77 FR 67802
System of Records Notice, and the Consumer Experience Research PIA.

11. Justification for Sensitive Questions
Questions about an individual’s finances, for example, whether a person has experience with
debt collection, are commonly considered sensitive. Nonetheless, the CFPB must ask these kinds
of questions in order to understand consumer behavior and recognize financial trends and
emergent risks relevant to consumers. Because these types of questions are central to the CFPB
mission, we believe that we are justified in asking these types of sensitive questions.

In addition, some people may believe that questions about race or other socioeconomic factors
may be considered sensitive. However, the CFPB is mandated to enforce fair lending laws and
focus on risks to vulnerable populations, including service members, students, older Americans,
and lower-income consumers. In addition, these types of questions are routinely asked by the
online panel we are using for this study. For these reasons, we feel justified in asking these
types of sensitive questions. For information collections involving questions of race/ethnicity, we
will ensure that the OMB standards for Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity
(Federal Register, October 30, 1997, Volume 62, Number 210, pages 58781-59790) are
followed.
Page 14 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

Respondent participation is voluntary; subjects will be made aware of this fact. All respondents
are free to opt-out of a data collection at any time and for any reason.

12. Estimated Burden of Information Collection
Information
No. of
Frequency
Annual
Average Annual
Collection
Respondents
Responses Response Burden
Requirement
Time
Hours
Screening /
Recruitment

17,750

1

17,750

0.05

888

Web Survey

8,000

1

8,000

0.33

2,667

Totals:

17,750*

25,750

3,555

*Respondents to the Web Survey are a subset of those who responded to the screener.

The screening and recruitment responses are estimated to require an average response time of .05
hours, as the number of screening questions will be limited. The estimate for average burden per
response to the web survey is based on the contractors’ study proposal and test plan.

13. Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents or Recordkeepers
There are no capital/start-up or ongoing operation/maintenance costs associated with this
information collection.

14. Estimated Cost to the Federal Government
There will be no annualized capital/start-up costs for the government to receive the survey
information. The testing is funded with non-appropriated funds. The contract to carry out the
study will cost $371,505.67.

Page 15 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

15. Program Changes or Adjustments
This is a new, one-time information collection request. Therefore, all the burden is considered to
be new burden and will be accounted for as a “program change” for the purposes of OMB’s PRA
inventory. The burden will be removed from OMB PRA inventory after the survey is completed.

16. Plans for Tabulation, Statistical Analysis, and Publication
The contractor’s report will provide tabulations at the aggregate level. Once the data is
tabulated, it will be presented to the CFPB along with an executive summary and detailed
findings about consumer comprehension and decision-making related to our debt collection form
alternatives for participants in the study.

The CFPB will also receive the underlying data from the contractor, to conduct our own
additional analysis, if appropriate. As discussed above, the CFPB may share aggregate findings
from the survey with the public as appropriate, for example, in connection with the release of a
further study of debt collection, or in connection with any potential rulemaking related to debt
collection. CFPB will only release unweighted analyses as part of any publications related to this
study.

17. Display of Expiration Date

The CFPB plans to display the OMB number and expiration date for OMB approval in the
survey instruments. Additionally, the OMB control number and expiration date will be displayed
on the Federal government’s electronic PRA docket at www.reginfo.gov.

Page 16 of 17

30-day Federal Register Notice Version

18.

Exceptions to the Certification Requirement

The Bureau certifies that this collection of information is consistent with the requirements of 5
C.F.R. 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 C.F.R .1320.8(b)(3) and is not seeking an
exemption to these certification requirements.
###

Page 17 of 17