U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Customer Service Survey

ICR 201707-0710-001

OMB: 0710-0012

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2017-07-21
Supporting Statement B
2017-07-21
Supporting Statement A
2017-07-21
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
5558 Modified
ICR Details
0710-0012 201707-0710-001
Active 201401-0710-001
DOD/COE
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Customer Service Survey
Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 04/05/2018
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 07/21/2017
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for three years.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
04/30/2021 36 Months From Approved
2,000 0 0
333 0 0
7,640 0 0

To survey applicants who are required to obtain permits or request jurisdictional determinations from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to do work in waters of the United States, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Opinions on the quality of the services they received may be used to make program evaluations/revisions for improvements.

EO: EO 12862 Name/Subject of EO: Setting Customer Service Standards
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  80 FR 45645 07/31/2015
82 FR 33876 07/21/2017
No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Regulatory Customer Service Survey

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 333 0 0 -167 0 500
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 7,640 0 0 -3,365 0 11,005
No
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
This is a request for reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired. The reduction in burden hours is primarily due to the decrease in the number of questions asked. In addition, adjustments to the previous application were made in two areas: 1) Previous submissions included more hard copy mailing costs and administration of the form (did not provide estimated cost of respondents’ time to complete a survey). 2) The majority of the decrease is due to a previous higher estimate of returns (15,000 estimated). Automation changes since the last submittal have made the online form easier to use and requires less time to complete. Total number of responses has also decreased from previous estimates. The new estimates are based on actual surveys submitted plus an estimated increase in response rates with automation or streamlining changes. Thus the decrease from 15,000 in 2011 to the 2,000 responses total provided with this submittal. The estimated time to complete the form has also been reduced. Unneeded fields (question that were often not answered) were removed and the form was streamlined from 14 to 8 questions. The number of responses has decreased since previous submittals due to a decrease in permit decisions. Furthermore, we have a more refined estimate in the number of submittals from previous submittals since responses are all electronic and we can quantify the number of submittals.

$1,107
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
    Yes
    Yes
No
No
No
Uncollected
Mayra Dalence 571 372-0417 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
07/21/2017


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy