Form CC Town Hall Surve CC Town Hall Surve CC Town Hall Survey Listening Sessions 2019

Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

CCTownHallSurvey_Listening Sessions 2019

Event Evaluation: IMLS Community Catalyst Listening Sessions

OMB: 3137-0081

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

IMLS Community Catalyst Listening Session Evaluation


Your responses will help IMLS to better plan meetings, workshops and educational sessions for the museum, archives, and library fields. We appreciate your time in completing this survey.


1. What one term best describes your current professional specialty?


  • Archiving

  • Consulting

  • Early Childhood/K-12/Post-Secondary Education

  • Communications/Public Relations

  • Exhibits or Educational Programs Design/Development

  • Grants Administration or Fundraising

  • Library Services

  • Collections Management/Curation

  • Operations/Finance/Technology

  • Grant-making

  • Social services or youth development provider

  • Community development/community organizing

  • Other (please specify)


2. What one term best describes your institution type?


  • Public Library or Archives

  • Private Library or Archives

  • University/College Library or Archives

  • Private Museum

  • Public Museum

  • University/College Museum

  • Professional Association

  • College/University Academic Department

  • School (K-12)

  • Policy-focused Organization

  • Foundation

  • Social Services

  • Youth Development

  • Community Development

  • For-profit Organization

  • Government Agency

  • Cultural Heritage Organization

  • Other (please specify)



3. Please tell us about your experience overall at the IMLS Community Catalyst Listening Session. (the “Listening Session”).


4. My expectations were met by the Listening Session.

Strongly Agree / Agree / Neutral / Disagree / Strongly Disagree

  • Comments:


5. How satisfied were you with the Listening Session overall?

Very satisfied / Some what satisfied / Neutral / Somewhat unsatisfied / Very unsatisfied

  • Comments:


6. How likely are you to return to a future Listening Session or workshop of this type?

Very likely / Somewhat likely / Neutral / Somewhat unlikely / Very unlikely

  • Comments:


7. What changes would we have to make for you to give it a higher rating?

  • Comments:


8. At the Listening Session I... (check all that apply)


  • Learned a new practice, tool, or resource for my work.

  • Improved my understanding of how other fields, other fields such as community development, can help museums and libraries be successful in community work.

  • Learned from projects or studies that apply to my field.

  • Met other professionals with whom I could exchange ideas.

  • Initiated collaborations to carry forward afterwards to benefit my community

  • Comments:


9. The Listening Session helped me to... Strongly Agree / Agree / Neutral / Disagree /Strongly Disagree / N/A


  • Network with museum and library professionals.

  • Learn from other organizations' projects and practices including funders and community developers

  • Understand the trends and best practices in collective impact work as relates to museums and libraries

  • Share my work and my organization’s community programs with others.

  • Connect with potential partners or collaborators.

  • Comments:


10. The Listening Session format enabled me to provide sufficient feedback on the draft tools and approaches. Strongly Agree / Agree / Neutral / Disagree /Strongly Disagree / N/A

  • Comments:





11. Please rate the Facilitators: Excellent / Good / Neutral / Fair / Poor

  • Comments:



12. Please rate the Asset Mapping exercise that you participated in: Excellent / Good / Neutral / Fair / Poor / Did not attend

    • Comments:


13. Please rate the Journey Mapping exercise that you participated in: Excellent / Good / Neutral / Fair / Poor / Did not attend

    • Comments:


14. Please rate the Theory of Change exercise that you participated in on Friday morning, September 9: Excellent / Good / Neutral / Fair / Poor / Did not attend

    • Comments:


15. Please rate the Logic Model exercise that you participated in: Excellent / Good / Neutral / Fair / Poor / Did not attend

    • Comments:



16. Please rate the Listening Session logistics and facilities:

Strongly Agree / Agree / Neutral / Disagree /Strongly Disagree / N/A


  • The online registration process was user friendly.

  • Communications prior to the workshop were adequate and provided useful information.

  • The meeting rooms were satisfactory.

  • The lodging rooms were satisfactory.

  • Comments:


17. Are there any additional comments you would like to share about the Listening Session?



18. May we contact you about your responses to the survey?

Email Address (optional)

Yes (please provide your email address) / No

Submit

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorKatie Murray
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-15

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy