Core Principles & Other Requirements for DCMs

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
(2019) 30-day Notice 3038-0052.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2019-06-26	Available
(2019) 60-day Notice 3038-0052.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2019-06-25	Available
(2019) Part 38 PRA - Supporting Statement 3038-0052.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2019-06-25	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
29100	Part 38 - Designated Contract Markets		Modified
219525	System Safeguards Testing Requirements		Modified
209110	Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds Held by Futures Commission Merchants and Derivatives Clearing Organizations		Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3038-0052	ICR Reference No: 201906-3038-007
Status: Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201804-3038-006
Agency/Subagency: CFTC	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Core Principles & Other Requirements for DCMs
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 08/28/2019
	Date Received in OIRA: 06/26/2019
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	08/31/2022	36 Months From Approved	05/31/2021
Responses	98	0	105
Time Burden (Hours)	6,853	0	7,358
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: In January 2018, the Commission adopted regulation 9.11(b)(3)(ii) requiring a designated contract market (DCM) or swap execution facility (SEF) (collectively, “exchange”) to include two additional elements in the disciplinary or access denial notice action provided to the National Futures Association. First, an exchange must include the type of product (as applicable) involved in the adverse action. Requiring an exchange to provide this information in the disciplinary or access denial notice will provide the Commission, market participants, the public, and other exchanges with greater transparency concerning where market abuses originate and whether the abuses are concentrated among certain product types. Second, an exchange must indicate in its notice of disciplinary or access denial actions whether the violation underlying the notice resulted in financial harm to any customers. The Commission believes that the inclusion of customer harm is essential because it cannot effectively perform its regulatory and oversight functions without knowledge of those instances in which brokers violate their fiduciary duty to customers by taking advantage of customer orders and engaging in fraudulent activity. The Commission concluded that the additional burden for an exchange to add the two additional elements in the contents of the disciplinary or access denial notice is de minimis and will not change the burden hours for the collection. In addition, The Commission has recently amended its regulation 1.52 to revise the scope and potential frequency of a third-party expert’s evaluation of SROs’ financial surveillance programs. The evaluation report requirement is a portion of the existing information collection of requirements for SROs under Commission regulation 1.52, including Designated Contract Markets and the National Futures Association. The Commission is eliminating the requirement that the examinations expert must review the SRO’s ongoing application of its supervisory program during periodic reviews and the analysis of the supervisory program’s design to detect material weaknesses in internal controls during both periodic reviews and the initial review prior to the program’s initial use. The Commission also is revising the frequency of when an SRO must engage an examinations expert. The changes to the examinations expert reviews impact the resulting expert reports information collection burden. The information collection is necessary to enhance the ability of the Commission and the designated self-regulatory organization to identify problematic financial matters in time to avoid market disruptions when an FCM may fail, particularly with respect to the tie-up of customer funds that may result.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 7 USC 6, 6a, 6c, 6d, 6f, 6g, 6i, 6j Name of Law: CEA
   US Code: 7 USC 6k, 6l, 6m, 6n 6o 6p 6r 6s Name of Law: CEA
   US Code: 7 USC 7, 7a-s, 7b, 7b-1, 7b-3 Name of Law: CEA
   US Code: 7 USC 8, 9, 10a, 12, 12a, 12c, 15 Name of Law: CEA
   US Code: 7 USC 13a, 13a-1, 15, 16, 16a, 19 Name of Law: CEA
   US Code: 7 USC 21, 23, 24 Name of Law: CEA
   US Code: 7 USC 1a, 2 Name of Law: CEA
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	84 FR 13008	04/03/2019
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	84 FR 30096	06/26/2019
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 3

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Part 38 - Designated Contract Markets
Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds Held by Futures Commission Merchants and Derivatives Clearing Organizations
System Safeguards Testing Requirements

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	98	105	0	-7	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	6,853	7,358	0	-505	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Changing Regulations

Short Statement: The Commission amended certain portions of Regulation 1.52 to reduce the scope of the third-party examinations expert’s review and permit a longer period of minimum engagement of the examinations expert by certain DCMs. These amendments reduce slightly the current burden hour estimate from 50 hours per respondent on an annual basis to 49 hours. Changes in the Final rules adopted herein only pertain to IC: Enhancing Protections Afforded Customers and Customer Funds Held by Futures Commission Merchants and Derivatives Clearing Organizations and relate only to amendments to Regulation 1.52. Additionally, unrelated to the 2018 NPRM, the number of registered DCMs has decreased from 15 to 14, which will also decrease the total aggregate burden hours across all registered DCMs from 7,357.5 burden hours to 6,853 burden hours

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Does this ICR request any personally identifiable information (see OMB Circular No. A-130 for an explanation of this term)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.     No

Does this ICR include a form that requires a Privacy Act Statement (see 5 U.S.C. §552a(e)(3))? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.     No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Yes

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 06/26/2019

---