Form N-3 - Supporting Statement (Dec. 2018)

Form N-3 - Supporting Statement (Dec. 2018).pdf

Form N-3 under the Securities Act of 1933 and under the Investment Company Act of 1940, registration of separate accounts organized as management investment companies.

OMB: 3235-0316

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 3235-0316
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
For the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
FORM N-3
A.

JUSTIFICATION
1.

Necessity for the Information Collection

Form N-3 (17 CFR 239.17a and 274.11b) is the form used by separate accounts offering
variable annuity contracts which are organized as management investment companies to register
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) (“Investment Company
Act”) and/or to register their securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.)
(“Securities Act”). Section 5 of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77e) requires the filing of a
registration statement prior to the offer of securities to the public and that the statement be
effective before any securities are sold, and section 8 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C.
80a-8) requires a separate account to register as an investment company. Section 5(b) of the
Securities Act makes it unlawful to carry or cause to be carried a security for purposes of sale or
for delivery after the sale “unless accompanied or preceded” by a prospectus that meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the Act (which, in turn, generally requires a prospectus relating
to a security to contain the information contained in the registration statement). For separate
accounts organized as management investment companies that offer variable annuity contracts,
Form N-3 provides the information required to appear in prospectus meeting the requirements of
section 10(a) of the Securities Act (as well as the information required to appear in the statement
of additional information (“SAI”)).
On October 30, 2018, the Commission issued a release proposing rule and form
amendments designed to enhance disclosures for variable annuities and variable life insurance
contracts (together, “variable contracts”). The proposed rules use a layered disclosure approach

that would permit a person to satisfy its prospectus delivery obligations under the Securities Act
for a variable contract by sending or giving a summary prospectus that presents key information
about a variable contract’s terms, benefits, and risks, with access to more detailed information
available online and electronically or in paper format on request. 1 The Commission also
proposed amendments to the registration forms for variable contracts, including Form N-3, to
update and enhance the disclosures to investors in these contracts, and to implement the
proposed summary prospectus framework. The Commission proposed to amend certain
disclosure requirements that Form N-3 currently includes, as well as to require certain new
disclosures regarding, among other things: an overview of the contract, key information about
the contract, principal risks, optional benefits available under the contract, loans, and the
investment options available under the contract. The Commission also proposed to eliminate or
reduce certain disclosures currently required by the form, such as disclosure of condensed
financial information for each class of accumulation units of the registrant for the last five fiscal
years, as opposed to the last ten fiscal years as is currently required.
2.

Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

The purpose of Form N-3 is to meet the filing and disclosure requirements of the
Securities Act and the Investment Company Act and to enable filers to provide investors with
information necessary to evaluate an investment in the security. This information collection
differs significantly from many other federal information collections, which are primarily for the
use and benefit of the collecting agency. The information required to be filed with the

1

Updated Disclosure Requirements and Summary Prospectus for Variable Annuity and Variable
Life Insurance Contracts, Investment Company Act Release No. 33286 (Oct. 30, 2016), available
at https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2018/33-10569.pdf.
2

Commission permits verification of compliance with securities law requirements and assures the
public availability and dissemination of the information.
3.

Consideration Given to Information Technology

The Commission’s electronic filing system (Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and
Retrieval or “EDGAR”) is designed to automate the filing, processing, and dissemination of full
disclosure filings. The system permits publicly held companies to transmit filings to the
Commission electronically. This automation has increased the speed, accuracy, and availability
of information, generating benefits to investors and financial markets. Form N-3 is required to
be filed with the Commission electronically on EDGAR (see 17 CFR 232.101(a)(1)(i) and (iv)).
The public may access filings on EDGAR through the Commission’s internet website
(http://www.sec.gov) or by using an EDGAR terminal located in the Commission’s public
reference rooms. Prospectuses and SAIs may be sent to investors by electronic means so long as
certain requirements are met. 2
4.

Duplication

The Commission periodically evaluates rule-based reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for duplication, and reevaluates them whenever it proposes a rule or a change in a
rule. The requirements of Form N-3 are not generally duplicated elsewhere.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

The Commission reviews all rules periodically, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), to identify methods to minimize recordkeeping or reporting
requirements affecting small businesses. The current and proposed disclosure requirements for
2

See Use of Electronic Media for Delivery Purposes, Securities Act Release No. 7233, Exchange
Act Release No. 36345, Investment Company Act Release No. 21399 (Oct. 6, 1995) [60 FR
53458 (Oct. 13, 1995)].
3

Form N-3 do not distinguish between small entities and larger entities. The burden on smaller
entities may be greater than for larger entities. This burden includes the cost of producing,
printing, and filing, and disseminating prospectuses and SAIs. The Commission believes,
however, that imposing different requirements on smaller investment companies would not be
consistent with investor protection and the purposes of the registration statements.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting Collection

The purpose of Form N-3 is to meet the filing and disclosure requirements of the
Securities Act and the Investment Company Act and to enable filers to provide investors with
information necessary to evaluate an investment in the security. Less frequent filing would be
inconsistent with the filing and disclosure requirements of the Securities Act and the Investment
Company Act. In addition, if the form were to be filed less frequently, investors may not be
provided with the information necessary to evaluate an investment in the security.
7.

Inconsistencies with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

Not Applicable.
8.

Consultation Outside the Agency

Before determining whether to adopt the proposed amendments to Form N-3, the
Commission will receive and evaluate public comments on the proposal and its collection of
information requirements. Moreover, the Commission and staff of the Division of Investment
Management participate in an ongoing dialogue with representatives of the investment company
industry through public conferences, meetings, and informal exchanges. These various forums
provide the Commission and staff with a means of ascertaining and acting upon paperwork
burdens that may confront the industry.

4

9.

Payment or Gift

Not Applicable.
10.

Confidentiality

Not Applicable.
11.

Sensitive Questions

No information of a sensitive nature, including social security numbers, will be required
under this collection of information. The information collection collects basic Personally
Identifiable Information (PII) that may include names, job titles and work addresses. However,
the agency has determined that the information collection does not constitute a system of record
for purposes of the Privacy Act. Information is not retrieved by a personal identifier. In
accordance with Section 208 of the E-Government Act of 2002, the agency has conducted a
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) of the EDGAR system, in connection with this collection of
information. The EDGAR PIA, published on 1/29/2016, is provided as a supplemental
document and is also available at https://www.sec.gov/privacy.
12.

Burden of Information Collection

The following estimates of average burden hours and costs are made solely for purposes
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and are not derived from a
comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the cost of Commission rules and
forms.
Form N-3 generally imposes two types of reporting burdens on investment companies:
(1) the burden of preparing and filing the initial registration statement; and (2) the burden of
preparing and filing post-effective amendments to a previously effective registration statement.
Providing the information required by Form N-3 is mandatory, and responses will not be kept
5

confidential.
In our most recently approved Paperwork Reduction Act submission for Form N-3,
Commission staff estimated that the total internal compliance burden to comply with Form N-3’s
collection of information requirement was 2,518 hours annually, with an estimated cost of
$164,144 each year. 3 Based on a review of Form N-3 filings made with the Commission,
Commission staff estimates that there will be no initial filings and that eight post-effective
amendments would be made on Form N-3 per year. 4 Commission staff further estimates these
filings would be made by five registrants and would cover an average of three investment
options per registration statement or post-effective amendment filing. 5
The proposed amendments would include certain disclosure changes and new
disclosures, but also would simplify certain current disclosure requirements in Form N-3. Based
on this, we estimate that, on a net basis, the proposed amendments to Form N-3 would increase
the burden of preparing an initial registration statement on Form N-3 by 5 hours per investment
option per filing. Amortizing this burden over a three-year period results in an estimated average

3

These estimates are based on the last time Form N-3’s information collection was approved,
pursuant to a submission for PRA renewal in 2018.

4

Commission staff reviewed initial filings and post-effective amendments for Form N-3 filed with
the Commission from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. There were no initial filings of
Form N-3 during that time period. There were eleven, seven, and six post-effective amendments
filed during 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. Averaging those post-effective amendments
over three years results in an average of eight post-effective amendments per year. This estimate
is based on the following calculation: (11 + 7 + 6) / 3 years = 8 per year.

5

Based on a review of filings with the Commission, we are increasing our estimate of the current
number of investment options per filing from two to three investment options. There are
currently five registration statements filed with the Commission on Form N-3 that cover 14
investment options. For purposes of this Paperwork Reduction Act analysis, we assume each
registration statement would cover an average of three investment options. 14 investment options
/ 5 registration statements = 2.8 investment options per registration statement.
6

annual burden of 1.7 hours per year, at an estimated internal time cost equivalent of $571. 6
However, because Commission staff estimates there would be no initial filings using Form N-3,
we estimate that the proposed amendments would result in no change to the total annual hour
burden for initial filings on Form N-3.
We further estimate a one-time burden of an additional 20 hours per registration
statement to update disclosures that are not related to the variable contract’s investment options
the first time the registration statement is amended by post-effective amendment following
adoption of the proposed amendments. Subsequently, we estimate an ongoing burden of an
additional 5 hours per registration statement per year to prepare and file a post-effective
amendment to update these disclosures. Amortizing these burdens over a three-year period
results in an estimated average annual burden of an additional 10 hours per registration statement
to prepare and file the post-effective amendment, at an estimated internal time cost equivalent of
$3,360. 7

6

The estimate of 1.7 hours is based upon the following calculation: (5 + 0 + 0) / 3 years = 1.67.
We are assuming 0 hours in years 2 and 3 because, after year 1, the registrant would prepare and
file post-effective amendments to the registration statement, and the hour burden of this is
captured in the paragraph accompanying infra note 7.
The internal time cost equivalent of $571 is calculated by multiplying the hour burden (1.7 hours)
by the estimated hourly wage of $336. The estimated wage figure is based on published rates for
Compliance Attorneys ($352) and Senior Programmers ($319). These hourly figures are from
SIFMA’s Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013, modified to
account for an 1,800-hour work year; multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size,
employee benefits and overheard; and adjusted to account for the effects of inflation. The
estimated wage rate was further based on the estimate that Compliance Attorneys and Senior
Programmers would divide time equally, resulting in a weighted wage rate of $336 (($352 +
$319) / 2 = 335.5).

7

The estimate of 15 hours is based upon the following calculation: (20 hours in year 1 + (5 hours
in year 2) + (5 hours in year 3) / 3 years = 10 hours. The internal time cost equivalent of $3,360
is calculated by multiplying the hour burden (10 hours) by the estimated hourly wage of $336.
See supra note 6.
7

In addition, we estimate a further burden of 6 hours per investment option to update
registration statement disclosures that are related to the variable contract’s investment options,
the first time the registration statement is amended by post-effective amendment following
adoption of the proposed amendments. Subsequently, we estimate an ongoing burden of an
additional 1.5 hours per investment option per year to prepare and file a post-effective
amendment to update these disclosures. Amortizing these burdens over a three-year period
results in an estimated average annual burden of an additional 3 hours per investment option to
prepare and file a post-effective amendment, at an estimated internal time cost equivalent of
$3,360. 8
Therefore, we estimate that the proposed amendments to Form N-3 would cause
registrants to incur an additional annual burden of 152 hours, at an internal time cost equivalent
of $51,072. 9 In the aggregate, we estimate the total annual hour burden to update registration

8

The estimate of 3 hours is based upon the following calculation: (6 hours in year 1 + (1.5 hours
in year 2) + (1.5 hours in year 3) / 3 years = 3 hours. The internal time cost equivalent of $1,008
is calculated by multiplying the hour burden (3 hours) by the estimated hourly wage of $336. See
supra note 6.
In our most recently approved Paperwork Reduction Act submission, we estimated that a
registrant with multiple investment options would experience a burden of complying with the
requirements of Form N-3 that is proportional to the number of investment options that the
registrant offers. Thus, we assumed that 8 post-effective amendment filings per year that cover
14 investment options would represent 14 responses. However, since many of the disclosure
requirements of Form N-3 do not depend on the number of investment options offered by the
registrant, we have revised that estimate to reflect an incremental burden per investment option,
as opposed to a burden that is proportional to the number of investment options that the registrant
offers. Thus, we now assume that 8 post-effective amendment filings per year, each covering
three investment options, would represent 8 responses.

9

The estimate of 152 hours is based upon the following calculation: (10 hours per post-effective
amendment x 8 post-effective amendments) + (3 hours per investment option per post-effective
amendment x 3 investment options per registration statement x 8 post-effective amendments).
The estimate of $51,072 is based upon the following calculation: 152 hours x $336/hour =
$51,072.
8

statements as a result of the proposed amendments would be 1,491 hours, at an internal time cost
equivalent of $500,976. 10
The estimates associated with Form N-3’s burden hours are as follows:
Table 1: Summary of Annual Responses, Burden Hours, and Burden Hour Costs
Estimates for the Information Collection in Proposed Form N-3
Form N-3
Initial Registration
Statements
Post-Effective
Amendments
TOTAL:

13.

No. of Responses
(annual)

0

Total Burden Hours
(annual)
0

Total Burden Hour
Costs (annual)
$0

8

1,491

$500,976

8

1,491

$500,976

Cost to Respondents

Cost burden is the cost of goods and services purchased to prepare and update filings on
Form N-3, such as for the services of independent auditors and outside counsel. The external
cost burden does not include the cost of the internal hour burden discussed in Item 12. Estimates
are based on the Commission’s experience with the filing of registration forms. In our most
recently approved Paperwork Reduction Act submission for Form N-3, Commission staff
estimated the cost burden for preparing and filing a post-effective amendment to a previouslyeffective registration statement is $10,259 per investment option, with a total annual approved
external cost burden of $164,144. 11 Consistent with the change in our methodology for
estimating burdens attributable to investment options, we are revising those estimates.
10

This estimate is based on the following calculation: 0 initial registration statements + (8
post-effective amendments x (179.86 hours current burden + 10 hours under proposed
amendments)) + (8 post-effective amendments x 3 hours per investment option x 3 investment
options) = approximately 1,491 hours. The estimate of $500,976 is based upon the following
calculation: 1,491 hours x $336/hour = $500,976.

11

This estimate is based on the following calculation: 0 initial registration statements + ($10,259
per investment option per post-effective amendment x 8 post-effective amendments per year x 2
investment options per post-effective amendment) = $164,144.
9

We estimate that the cost burden for preparing and filing a post-effective amendment to a
previously-effective registration statement would be $10,259 per registration statement to update
disclosures that are not related to the contract’s investment options, and an additional $3,420 per
investment option to update disclosures that are related to the contract’s investment options. 12
Therefore, we estimate the total external cost burden as a result of the proposed amendments
would be $164,152, which would represent an increase due to the change in our methodology for
estimating burdens attributable to investment options. 13
The estimates associated with Form N-3’s external costs are as follows:
Table 2: Summary of Annual Responses and Total External Cost Estimates for the
Information Collection in Proposed Form N-3
Form N-3
Initial Registration
Statements
Post-Effective
Amendments
TOTAL:

No. of Responses
(annual)

0

Total External Costs
(annual)

$0

8

$164,152

8

$164,152

12

See supra note 8. Based on staff experience, we estimate that the external cost burden to update
disclosures associated with each investment option would be approximately 1/3 of the cost
burden to update disclosures associated with the registration statement. $10,259 / 3 = $3,420.
We request comment on this assumption and this estimate.

13

This estimate is based on the following calculation: 0 initial registration statements + ($10,259
per registration statement per post-effective amendment x 8 post-effective amendments per year)
+ ($3,420 per investment option x 3 investment options x 8 post-effective amendments) =
$164,152.
10

14.

Cost to the Federal Government

The annual cost of reviewing and processing registration statements, post-effective
amendments, proxy statements, shareholder reports, and other filings of investment companies
amounted to approximately $22.2 million in fiscal year 2017, based on the Commission’s
computation of the value of staff time devoted to this activity and related overhead. A portion of
those costs relate to processing and reviewing Form N-3 filings submitted to the Commission.
15.

Change in Burden

Currently, the approved total annual hour burden for preparing and filing registration
statements on Form N-3 is 2,518 internal burden hours. We estimate that the new internal
burden would be approximately 1,491 hours annually, reflecting a decrease of 1,027 internal
burden hours associated with the proposed amendments. This decrease in the total annual hour
burden is due to the change in our methodology regarding burdens attributable to investment
options, notwithstanding the increase in the estimated number of investment options associated
with Form N-3 registrants, as well as the increased burden hours per filing as a result of the
proposed amendments. 14
The current estimate for the external annual cost burdens associated with preparing and
filing initial and post-effective registration statements on Form N-3 is $164,144. We estimate
that the new external annual cost burden would be approximately $164,152, reflecting an
increase of $8 associated with the proposed amendments. This increase in the total external cost
estimate is due to the change in our methodology regarding burdens attributable to investment
14

As discussed above, we have changed our methodology for determining burdens attributable to
investment options, which now reflect an incremental burden per investment option as opposed to
being proportional to the number of investment options that the registrant offers. Thus, we now
assume that 8 post-effective amendment filings per year, covering 14 investment options, would
represent 8 responses, as opposed to 14. See supra note 8.
11

options, notwithstanding the increase in the estimated number of investment options associated
with Form N-3 registrants, as well as the increased burden hours per filing as a result of the
proposed amendments. 15
16.

Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes

Not Applicable.
17.

Approval to Omit OMB Expiration Date

We request authorization to omit the expiration date on the electronic version of the form
for design and IT project scheduling reasons. The OMB control number will be displayed.
18.
Submission

Exceptions to Certification Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act

Not Applicable.
B.

COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS
Not Applicable.

15

See supra note 8.
12


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleOMB CONTROL NUMBER: 3235-0316
AuthorChang, Daniel K.
File Modified2020-03-02
File Created2020-03-02

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy