0261 - Customer Satisfaction Survey for Census of Ag - Public Affairs - 3-3-2021

Fast Track Generic Clearance for Qualitative Feedback on Customer Satisfaction Surveys

0261 - Customer Satisfaction Survey for Census of Ag - Public Affairs - 3-3-2021

OMB: 0535-0261

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Request for Approval under the “Generic Clearance for the Collection of Routine Customer Feedback” (OMB Control Number: 0535-0261)

_____________________________________________________________________________

TITLE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION: Focus Group Interviews for the USDA NASS Census of Agriculture.

Sample categories of questions for in-depth interview with eight of USDA NASS Census of Agriculture stakeholder groups.



  1. Communications stakeholders currently receive from NASS

  • Variety of communications?

    • Categories: direct, print, digital, social, AV, events, environmental / experiential

    • Content types: Thought leadership, community building, etc.

  • Quality of communications?

    • Usefulness, appropriateness, production value

  • Frequency of communications?

    • Meets my needs, not enough, too much

  • Shareability?

    • Audiences: members, peers, media, other stakeholders

    • Formats: highly sharable, somewhat shareable, not very shareable

    • One-off’s / evergreen versus living assets (serial content)

  • Audiences

    • Who are we missing? (Ethnicity, gender, veteran, age cohorts, level of farming / ranching experience, geography, crop / livestock choices)

    • Why is that missing audience special and important?

    • What communications needs do they have that aren’t being met?

  • Ability to contribute content?

    • Open and straightforward, limited but available, not open or straightforward

  • Necessary but missing communications?

    • Formats, content, frequency,



  1. NASS as a voice of the agriculture ecosystem: Advocating for and educating about Ag …

  • At all levels: what’s going well, what isn’t, what should they do more / less

  • In the right places: what’s going well, what isn’t, what should they do more / less

  • At the right times: what’s going well, what isn’t, what should they do more / less

  • With audiences: what’s going well, what isn’t, what should they do more / less

  • With content: what’s going well, what isn’t, what should they do more / less

  • With calls to action: what’s going well, what isn’t, what should they do more / less











  1. Their own organization’s communications behaviors

  • Audiences and proportions: members, community / state / national / industry leadership, media

  • Purposes and proportions: education, activation, community-building / partnerships, capacity-building

  • Formats and proportions: direct, print, digital, social, AV, events, environmental / experiential

  • How they measure the success of their own communications



  1. Biggest changes in communications behaviors inside the Ag ecosystem (producers, processors, supplier industry, regulators, legislators, consumers, affinity groups)

  • What’s changed the most, and how?

  • What changes do you like / dislike, and why?

  • What changes should have happened, but haven’t yet?



  1. The 2022 Census of Agriculture

  • What communications worked best during past Censuses? What didn’t, and why?

  • What’s different about the comms environment for this edition of the Census?

    • Peoples’ attitude towards the surveys?

    • Peoples’ attitude towards the federal government?

    • Peoples’ attitude towards the USDA?

    • Peoples’ attitude about other parts of the agriculture industry?

  • Would it make a difference if the Census story was told by agriculture itself?

  • Who else should farmers/ranchers be hearing from when it comes to the Census?



Page 3 of 3

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorBayard Brewin
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-11-14

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy