1014-0003 30-Day FRN

22754

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 102 / Thursday, May 29, 2025 / Notices

11, 2025). The Service prepared this
ROD considering this change and
related E.O.s, including E.O. 14154,
‘‘Unleashing American Energy,’’ as
discussed in the ROD.
Rationale for Decision
We have made the determination that
DSL’s application, including the HCP,
meet the statutory permit issuance
criteria set forth in section 10(a)(2)(B)
(16 U.S.C. 1539(a)(2)(B)). Our
assessment of the application was
conducted in accordance with the
requirements of section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the ESA and its implementing
regulations. Based on our review of the
alternatives and their environmental
consequences as described in the final
EIS, we selected the proposed action
because issuance of the ITP and
implementation of the HCP best fulfill
the Service’s statutory mission and
responsibilities while meeting our
purpose and need. This decision is
described further in the ROD.
Authority
We provide this notice pursuant to
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
Department of the Interior guidance
(318 DM 3).
Bridget Fahey,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2025–09636 Filed 5–28–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement
[Docket ID BSEE–2024–0006; EEEE500000
256E1700D2 ET1SF0000.EAQ000; OMB
Control Number 1014–0003]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Oil and Gas Production
Safety Systems
Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, the Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement (BSEE, we)
proposes to renew an information
collection.

ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1

SUMMARY:

Interested persons are invited to
submit comments. To be considered,
your comments must be received on or
before June 30, 2025.

DATES:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:50 May 28, 2025

Jkt 265001

Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
30-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function. Please provide a copy of your
comments to Kelly Odom, Acting BSEE
ICCO, 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling,
VA 20166; or by email to kelly.odom@
bsee.gov. Please reference OMB Control
Number 1014–0003 in the subject line of
your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Odom by email at kelly.odom@
bsee.gov, or by telephone at (703) 787–
17775. Individuals in the United States
who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing,
or have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. You may
also view the ICR at http://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the PRA and 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1), we provide the general
public and other Federal agencies with
an opportunity to comment on new,
proposed, revised, and continuing
collections of information. This helps us
assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand our
information collection requirements and
provide the requested data in the
desired format.
A Federal Register notice with a 60day public comment period soliciting
comments on this collection of
information was published on August
30, 2024, (89 FR 70664). No comments
were received.
As part of our continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burdens, we are again soliciting
comments from the public and other
Federal agencies on the proposed ICR
that is described below. We are
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following:
(1) Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether or not the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
ADDRESSES:

PO 00000

Frm 00076

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) How might the agency minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of response.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: The regulations at 30 CFR
part 250, subpart H concern oil and gas
production safety systems and are the
subject of this collection. The authority
and responsibility for issuing these
regulations are among those delegated to
BSEE. This request also covers any
related notices to lessees and operators
(NTLs) that BSEE issues to clarify,
supplement, or provide additional
guidance on some aspects of our
regulations.
BSEE uses the information collected
under subpart H to:
• review safety system designs prior
to installation to ensure that minimum
safety standards will be met;
• evaluate equipment and/or
procedures used during production
operations;
• review records of erosion control to
ensure that erosion control programs are
effective;
• review plans to ensure safety of
operations when more than one activity
is being conducted simultaneously on a
production facility;
• review records of safety devices to
ensure proper maintenance during the
useful life of that equipment; and
• verify proper performance of safety
and pollution prevention equipment.
Title of Collection: 30 CFR part 250,
subpart H, ‘‘Oil and Gas Production
Safety Systems.’’
OMB Control Number: 1014–0003.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Potential respondents include Federal
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil, gas,

E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM

29MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 102 / Thursday, May 29, 2025 / Notices
and sulfur lessees and/or operators and
holders of pipeline rights-of-way.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: Currently there are
approximately 60 oil and gas drilling
and production operators on the OCS.
Not all the potential respondents will
submit information in any given year,
and some may submit multiple times.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 7,454.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: Varies from .5 hour to 41
hours, depending on activity.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 91,250.
Respondent’s Obligation: Responses
are mandatory.
Frequency of Collection: Submissions
are generally on occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: $11,455,906.
An agency may not conduct, or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Kirk Malstrom,
Chief, Regulations and Standards Branch.
[FR Doc. 2025–09583 Filed 5–28–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1394]

Certain Liquid Coolers for Electronic
Components in Computers,
Components Thereof, Devices for
Controlling Same, and Products
Containing Same; Notice of a
Commission Determination To Review
in Part a Final Initial Determination
Finding a Violation of Section 337;
Request for Written Submissions on
the Issues Under Review and on
Remedy, the Public Interest, and
Bonding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
determined to review in part a final
initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the
presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’), Chief Judge Cheney. The
Commission requests written
submissions from the parties on the
issues under review and submissions
from the parties, interested government

ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:50 May 28, 2025

Jkt 265001

agencies, and other interested persons
on the issues of remedy, the public
interest, and bonding, under the
schedule set forth below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edward S. Jou, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3316. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
The
Commission instituted this investigation
on March 21, 2024, based on a
complaint filed on behalf of Cooler
Master Co., Ltd. of Taiwan; CMI USA,
Inc. of Claremont, California; and CMC
Great USA, Inc. of San Jose, California
(collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). 89 FR
20247–48 (Mar. 21, 2024). The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain liquid coolers for
electronic components in computers,
components thereof, devices for
controlling same, and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 1–3 and 14 of
U.S. Patent No. 10,509,446 (‘‘the ’446
patent’’); claims 1–4 of U.S. Patent No.
11,061,450 (‘‘the ’450 patent’’); and the
claim of U.S. Patent No. D856,941 (‘‘the
’941 design patent’’). Id. The complaint
further alleges that a domestic industry
exists. Id. The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
SilverStone Technology Co., Ltd. of
Taiwan; SilverStone Technology, Inc. of
Chino, California; Enermax Technology
Corp. of Taiwan; Enermax USA of
Chino, California; Shenzhen Apaltek
Co., Ltd. of China; and Guangdong
Apaltek Liquid Cooling Technology Co.,
Ltd. of China (collectively,
‘‘Respondents’’). Id. The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations is not
participating in the investigation. Id.
The ’941 design patent was
terminated from the investigation by
withdrawal of the complaint. Order No.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

PO 00000

Frm 00077

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

22755

7 (Sept. 6, 2024), unreviewed by
Comm’n Notice (Sept. 30, 2024).
A claim construction hearing was
held on July 22, 2024, and a claim
construction order issued on November
20, 2024. Order No. 10 (Nov. 20, 2024).
An evidentiary hearing was held on
December 2–5, 2024.
On March 21, 2025, the ALJ issued
the subject ID. Respondents filed a
petition for review of the ID on April 4,
2025. Complainants filed their response
on April 14, 2025.
Having reviewed the record of the
investigation, including the final ID, the
parties’ submissions to the ALJ, and the
petition for review and response thereto,
the Commission has determined to
review the ID in part. Specifically, the
Commission has determined to review
the ID’s analysis of the limitation
‘‘defining a heat exchange chamber’’ in
the asserted claims of the ’446 patent
and the ’450 patent in the context of
invalidity, infringement, and the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement. The Commission has also
determined to review the ID’s findings
on the economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement. The Commission
has determined not to review the ID’s
findings on other issues.
In connection with its review, the
Commission requests responses to the
following questions. The parties are
requested to brief their positions with
reference to the applicable law and the
existing evidentiary record.
(1) Did the ID apply the plain and
ordinary meaning of the claim
limitation ‘‘defining a heat exchange
chamber’’ in the context of the ’446
patent and ’450 patent with respect to
invalidity, infringement, and the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement? If you disagree with the
ID’s interpretation of this limitation,
please explain what meaning should
have been applied and identify where
you raised such arguments before the
ALJ.
(2) Did the ID consistently apply the
scope of the ‘‘defining a heat exchange
chamber’’ limitation to the prior art, the
accused products, and the domestic
industry products? If you contend that
there are inconsistencies in the ID,
please explain how the limitation
should have been consistently applied
and identify where you raised such
arguments before the ALJ.
(3) What is the amount of the
domestic industry investments in
dispute with respect to the remote
controller addressed in the ID at pages
118–20? Are the domestic industry
activities related to the remote
controller limited to certain employees,
a certain timeframe, or certain domestic

E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM

29MYN1