Consolidated State Performance Report (Part I and Part II)

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Att_83C Form 6-13-2011.pdf	Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change	Uploaded 2011-06-13	Available
Att_Technical Modifications_CSPR_10-11.xls	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-06-13	Available
Att_Transmittal Memo 6-10-2011.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-06-13	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
181710	Consolidated State Performance Report I and II	Other-CSPR Part I	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1810-0614	ICR Reference No: 201106-1810-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201008-1810-004
Agency/Subagency: ED/OESE	Agency Tracking No: 4639
Title: Consolidated State Performance Report (Part I and Part II)
Type of Information Collection: No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 06/23/2011
	Date Received in OIRA: 06/14/2011
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	11/30/2013	11/30/2013	11/30/2013
Responses	14,653	0	14,653
Time Burden (Hours)	11,785	0	11,864
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) is the required annual reporting tool for each State, Bureau of Indian Education, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico as authorized under Section 9303 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). The Department uses the information derived from the CSPR to : (1) monitor and report its progress in meeting Strategic Plan goals; (2) assess and report individual program performance, including GPRA performance measures; (3) monitor States' implementation of NCLB and the extent to which States are meeting programs and accountability goals;(4)to identify areas for technical assistance to States and overall program improvement; and (5) to inform other reporting and program evaluation requirements specific to individual programs and including the Secretary's Annual State Report to Congress on No Child Left Behind. Specific to this submission, which requests the addition of new items to meet statutory and regulatory reporting requirement, Title I monitoring teams and other ED officials will use these data to ensure that SEAs, LEAs, and schools implement science assessment requirements and school improvement activities in accordance with ESEA statute and regulations.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 20 USC 6301 Name of Law: Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: PL: Pub.L. 107 - 110 1003 Name of Law: School Improvement
US Code: 20 USC 6303 Name of Law: ESEA as amended by 2001 NCLB

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 37766	06/30/2010
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 55780	09/14/2010
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Consolidated State Performance Report I and II

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	14,653	14,653	0	0	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	11,785	11,864	0	-79	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Changing Forms

Short Statement: The change in burden is due to the elimination of questions from the CSPR. The program office determined that they did not need the questions enough to justify the burden on states. The removal of the data elements resulted in a reduction of burden by 79 hours. There is no change in the number of respondents.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $40,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 06/14/2011

---