60 Day Federal Register Notice

34314

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 104 / Tuesday, May 31, 2016 / Notices

sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Attendee phone audio access code 684–
586–345, and then enter your audio
phone pin (shown after joining the
webinar). Participants are encouraged to
use their telephone, as this is the best
practice to avoid technical issues and
excessive feedback. (See http://
www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/
PFMC_Audio_Diagram_
GoToMeeting.pdf). System
Requirements for PC-based attendees:
Required: Windows® 7, Vista, or XP; for
Mac®-based attendees: Required: Mac
OS® X 10.5 or newer; and for mobile
attendees: iPhone®, iPad®, AndroidTM
phone or Android tablet (See the
GoToMeeting Webinar Apps). You may
send an email to kris.kleinschmidt@
noaa.gov or contact him at (503) 820–
2280, extension 425 for technical
assistance. A public listening station
will also be provided at the Pacific
Council office.
Council address: Pacific Council,
7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 101,
Portland, OR 97220–1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mike Burner, Pacific Council;
telephone: (503) 820–2414.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
SRWCW will discuss progress on the
development of new indicators and
predictors of Sacramento River winter
Chinook ocean abundance, review
methods for evaluating the relative risks
and benefits of alternative harvest
control rules, prepare a report for the
Council’s June 2016 meeting, and
discuss future meeting plans.
Although nonemergency issues not
contained in the meeting agenda may be
discussed, those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Action will be restricted to
those issues specifically listed in this
document and any issues arising after
publication of this document that
require emergency action under section
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the intent to take final action to address
the emergency.
Special Accommodations
The meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Mr.
Kris Kleinschmidt at (503) 820–2280,
extension 425 at least 5 days prior to the
meeting date.
Dated: May 25, 2016.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–12715 Filed 5–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:07 May 27, 2016

Jkt 238001

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Notice of Intent To Renew
Collection 3038–0017, Market Surveys
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’),
Federal agencies are required to publish
notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information and to allow 60 days for
public comment. This notice solicits
comments on market investigations.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘Market Surveys,’’
Collection Number 3038–0017, by any
of the following methods:
• The Agency’s Web site, at http://
comments.cftc.gov/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
through the Web site.
• Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC
20581.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
Mail above.
Please submit your comments using
only one method.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
through the Portal.
Please submit your comments using
only one method.
All comments must be submitted in
English, or if not, accompanied by an
English translation. Comments will be
posted as received to http://
www.cftc.gov.
SUMMARY:

Gary
J Martinaitis, Associate Deputy Director,
Division of Market Oversight,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, (202) 418–5209; email:
[email protected], and refer to OMB
Control No. 3038–0017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA, Federal agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of Information’’ is defined
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

PO 00000

Frm 00006

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3
and includes agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies
to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, the CFTC is publishing
notice of the proposed collection of
information listed below.
Title: Market Surveys (OMB Control
No. 3038–0017). This is a request for
extension of a currently approved
information collection.
Abstract: Under Commission Rule
21.02, upon call by the Commission,
information must be furnished related to
futures or options positions held or
introduced by futures commission
merchants, members of contract
markets, introducing brokers, foreign
brokers, and for options positions, by
each reporting market. This rule is
designed to assist the Commission in
prevention of market manipulation and
is promulgated pursuant to the
Commission’s rulemaking authority
contained in section 8a of the
Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 12a
(2010).
With respect to the collection of
information, the CFTC invites
comments on:
• Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have a practical use;
• The accuracy of the Commission’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Ways to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. If you wish the Commission to
consider information that you believe is
exempt from disclosure under the
Freedom of Information Act, a petition
for confidential treatment of the exempt
information may be submitted according

E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM

31MYN1

34315

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 104 / Tuesday, May 31, 2016 / Notices
to the procedures established in § 145.9
of the Commission’s regulations.1
The Commission reserves the right,
but shall have no obligation, to review,
pre-screen, filter, redact, refuse or
remove any or all of your submission
from http://www.cftc.gov that it may

deem to be inappropriate for
publication, such as obscene language.
All submissions that have been redacted
or removed that contain comments on
the merits of the Information Collection
Request will be retained in the public
comment file and will be considered as

required under the Administrative
Procedure Act and other applicable
laws, and may be accessible under the
Freedom of Information Act.
Burden Statement: The respondent
burden for this collection is estimated to
be as follows.

ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN
17 CFR section

Annual number of respondents

Frequency of
response

Total annual
responses

Hours per
response

Total hours

21.02 ....................................................................................

400

Annually

400

1.75

700

Respondents/Affected Entities: futures
commission merchants, members of
contract markets, introducing brokers,
foreign brokers, contract markets.
Estimated number of respondents:
400.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 700 hours.
Frequency of collection: Annually.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Dated: May 25, 2016.
Robert N. Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–12707 Filed 5–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Availability of Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Continental United States
Interceptor Site
Missile Defense Agency,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability and notice
of activity in Wetlands as required by
Executive Order 11990 (Protection of
Wetlands).
AGENCY:

The Missile Defense Agency
(MDA) announces the availability of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the potential deployment of a
Continental United States (CONUS)
Interceptor Site (CIS). A CIS Draft EIS
was prepared in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969 and the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of NEPA and assesses the impacts of the
potential deployment of a CIS.
As required by the fiscal year 2013
National Defense Authorization Act, the
MDA has conducted extensive surveys
and assessments for development of a

sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

1 17

Draft EIS in order to evaluate candidate
sites for the potential future deployment
of additional ground-based interceptors
for homeland defense against threats
from nations such as North Korea and
Iran.
All potential sites analyzed in this
Draft EIS contain wetlands that would
be affected. All practicable measures
were taken to arrange a CIS footprint to
minimize and avoid impacts to
wetlands while still maintaining
operational effectiveness. However there
are no practicable deployment
alternatives that would completely
avoid impacts to wetlands. If a
deployment decision were made MDA
would coordinate with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and applicable state
department of environmental protection
to determine appropriate mitigations for
wetland impacts. As required by
Executive Order (EO) 11990 (Protection
of Wetlands), MDA would prepare a
Finding of No Practicable Alternative
(FONPA) for the selected site. The
FONPA would explain why there is no
practicable alternative to impacting
wetlands at the identified site. MDA is
providing a public review, in
accordance with EO 11990, of its
findings in the Draft EIS concerning
wetlands impacts and potential
mitigation measures.
DATES: The public comment period will
be from June 3 to July 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the Draft EIS
should be received by July 18, 2016 by
one of the following methods:
• Mail: U.S. Postal Service to: Black
& Veatch Special Projects Corp. Attn:
MDA CIS EIS, 6800 W 115th Street,
Suite 2200, Overland Park, KS–66211–
2420.
• Email: [email protected].
Public comments on the Draft EIS are
requested pursuant to the NEPA. All
written comments received during the
comment period will become part of the
public record. Providing private address

information with your comment is
voluntary and such personal
information will be kept confidential
unless release is required by law. All
comments received by the public,
including at public meetings, will be
addressed in the Final EIS. A NOA will
be published notifying the public of the
final EIS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Christopher Johnson, MDA Public
Affairs, at 571–231–8212, or by email:
[email protected]. For more
information, including a downloadable
copy of the Draft EIS, visit the MDA
Web site at http://www.mda.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Action and Alternative: The
Department of Defense (DoD) does not
have a proposed action and has not
made a decision to deploy or construct
an additional interceptor site. Current
sites in Alaska and California provide
the necessary protection of the
homeland from a ballistic missile attack
by countries such as North Korea and
Iran. If the DoD were to make a decision
in the future to construct a new site, the
prior completion of the required site
studies and EIS could shorten the
timeline necessary to build such a site.
If deployed, a CIS would be an
extension of the existing Ground-based
Midcourse Defense (GMD) element of
the Ballistic Missile Defense System. To
the extent practicable, the CIS would be
built as a contiguous Missile Defense
Complex, similar to that found at Fort
Greely, Alaska, and would consist of a
deployment of up to a total of 60
Ground-Based Interceptors (GBIs) in up
to three GBI fields. The GBIs would not
be fired from their deployment site
except in the Nation’s defense and no
test firing would be conducted at a CIS.
The overall system architecture and
baseline requirements for a notional CIS
include, but are not limited to, the GBI
fields, Command Launch Equipment,
In-Flight Interceptor Communication

CFR 145.9.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:07 May 27, 2016

Jkt 238001

PO 00000

Frm 00007

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM

31MYN1